bisexula:

bisexula:

love is a

love-state-of-matter-poll

explain ur reasoning in the tags … :)

already emotional over all of your reasonings im excited to see this progress


Tags:

#it’s a solid because of the way it gives object permanence to relationships #you notice if a loved one isn’t around #whereas you wouldn’t notice if someone removed a little bit of the atmosphere or removed a drop from your water bottle #one oxygen molecule is like another: you need *some*‚ but it doesn’t matter which ones #but every solid is different #surveys #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what

Anonymous asked: rot13ed due to mentioning n s f w topics. not sure if you’re comfortable receiving this kind of ask, ignore it if it bothers you. “cbea vf n purnc xabpxbss irefvba bs fbzrguvat ryfr” bxnl Ze. oenva travhf cyrnfr gryy zr jurer v pna svaq gur erny yvsr crbcyr orvat vasyngrq yvxr n onyybba (naq abg orvat unezrq orlbaq zvyq rzoneenffzrag va gur cebprff)? orpnhfr v jbhyq irel zhpu yvxr gb svaq guvf. lbh unir ab vqrn ubj zhpu v jbhyq yvxr gb svaq guvf. (npghnyyl, lbh’ir orra ba gur vagrearg zbfg bs lbhe yvsr. lbh cebonoyl unir n cerggl tbbq vqrn bs ubj zhpu v’q yvxr gb svaq guvf.)

{{Translation of ask:

“porn is a cheap knockoff version of something else” okay Mr. brain genius please tell me where i can find the real life people being inflated like a balloon (and not being harmed beyond mild embarrassment in the process)? because i would very much like to find this. you have no idea how much i would like to find this. (actually, you’ve been on the internet most of your life. you probably have a pretty good idea of how much i’d like to find this.)}}

eightyonekilograms:

oligetcetera-deactivated2023072:

On the contrary, this is a delightfully unique ask! Thanks, even if I can’t give a satisfying answer. But since you did:

Nyevtug, fb svefg, V jnag gb gunax lbh orpnhfr guvf jnf n ernyvgl purpx ntnvafg zl fhccbfvgvbaf. Gur fgngrzrag nf V bevtvanyyl znqr vg qbrfa’g fgnaq hc gb zhpu fpehgval; abg whfg va pnfrf yvxr lbhef ohg va rira gur zbfg znvafgernz gnfgr. Snagnfvrf nera’g ernyvgl be rira n cbbe irefvba bs ernyvgl, naq gurer ner cyragl bs pnfrf jurer gurl’er npgviryl orggre; pregnvayl gur onqarff qbrfa’g sybj bire: vg jbhyq or na hahfhny zbanzbebhf crefba jub qvqa’g fbzrgvzrf snagnfvmr nobhg bgure crbcyr, rira gubhtu purngvat vf jebat; gur oybbqyhfg vaqhytrq va fubbgref be zrtnybznavn va fgengrtl tnzrf jbhyq or qnatrebhf va nabgure pbagrkg ohg svar va vg, naq fb ba. V jba’g fnl vg arire pneevrf bire nf na veba cevapvcyr ohg pregnvayl V jbhyqa’g ybbx ng na vasyngvba srgvfu nfxnapr va gur fnzr jnl V zvtug fbzrbar jvgu rynobengr snagnfvrf bs gbeghevat fgenatref gb qrngu, rira gubhtu npghnyyl vasyngvat fbzrbar jbhyq or onq, nf lbh abgr. V yvxr tevzqnex ECTf naq gurl’er gurve bja tbbq guvat naq abg n cnyr ersyrpgvba bs npghny tevz qnexarff, juvpu vf onq.

Jung V guvax V jbhyq fgvyy fgnaq ol vf gung V guvax cbeabtencul, ng gur irel yrnfg va gur zbqny pnfr, vf n fhcrefgvzhyhf va n jnl V frr xvaq bs rirelguvat geraqvat gbjneqf. Cbeabtencul vf cebonoyl yrff qnatrebhf guna zbfg bgure fhcrefgvzhyv bs guvf fbeg orpnhfr hayrff lbh tb bss gur qrrc raq lbh’er abg fcraqvat sberire ba vg, nygubhtu V guvax gurer’f na vapragvir tenqvrag gbjneqf gung. Jura zl qnq pnzr bire ur jbhyq whfg ynl ba gur pbhpu naq jngpu Snvy Nezl ivqrbf sbe ubhef; boivbhfyl gurer’f n ovttre vffhr gurer jvgu yvxr jbexcynpr rkunhfgvba (qhqr arrqf gb ergver) ohg vg frrzf jbefr.

Be gb chg vg zber pbapergryl naq yvzvgvat guvatf gb zl bja pnfr, V guvax zl bja fgvzhyhf (une) gb dhvg cbea pbyq ghexrl jnf yvxr qvfpbirevat ba erqqvg gurfr yvxr cebterffviryl zber naq zber rssvpvrag qryvirel zrpunavfzf, sebz nzvanxrq bs zl lbhgu juvpu jbhyq pbyyngr cvpf sebz bgure fvgrf ba gb gur ghor fvgrf naq erqqvgc naq erqqvgyvfg sbe qvfpbirel hagvy gurer jnf whfg bar jurer vg znpuvar yrneavatrq jung lbh hcibgrq naq fubjrq lbh zber naq zber bs gung, naq V qrpvqrq, “shpx, V’ir nyjnlf orra onq ng frys-pbageby, V’z ab zngpu sbe guvf.” V qba’g yvxr gur zrqvpnyvmvat ynathntr bs “nqqvpgvba” ohg gurer vf qrsvavgryl n curabzrabybtl bs “uhu V jvfu V unqa’g qbar fb zhpu bs gung, ubj pna V znxr zlfrys srry orggre nobhg vg bu k” juvpu V fgvyy srry nobhg n ybg bs guvatf bxnl zbfgyl fbpvny zrqvn jvgu yvxrf. (Urapr jul V ervapneangr urer fb bsgra. Juvpu V guvax unf npghnyyl jbexrq bhg cerggl jryy – vs V unq orra fgrnqvyl npphzhyngvat sbyybjref urer sbe n qrpnqr V guvax gung yriry bs rkcbfher jbhyq or onq.)

(Naljnl n pbhcyr lrnef yngre naq gur fpnel cbea qryvirel zrpunavfz vf abj gur rknpg zbqry lbhat crbcyr hfr gb qvfpbire nyy zrqvn, yby! Ubcr gung tbrf jryy.)

Xrrcvat hc jvgu guvf fjrnevat bss bs cbea unf orra gbhtu guvf cnfg unys lrne jurer zl cnegare nera’g dhvgr nf zngpurq va yvovqb nf jr hfrq gb or, ohg gubfr guvatf syhpghngr naq gou gur vqrn bs n “fgernx” pna or vgf bja tnzvsvrq zbgvingvba, naq fbzrgvzrf jura V’z gelvat gb tvir zlfrys n crc gnyx gung V’z zber pncnoyr guna V tvir zlfrys perqvg sbe gung’f jung V’yy pvgr, ba zl bja sbe-vagreany-hfr erfhzr.

Naljnl lbh jrer cebonoyl ubcvat sbe fbzr VEY vasyngvba gvcf juvpu V’z abg dhnyvsvrq gb tvir. (V pbhyq nfx PungTCG, ohg fb pbhyq lbh, naq V qrsvavgryl jbhyqa’g jnag gb fnl nalguvat nobhg gur zrqvpny nqivfnovyvgl bs nalguvat vg fhttrfgrq! Shaal bar gb vzntvar hfvat gur tenaqzn rkcybvg ba gubhtu yby.) Ohg znlor zl sbyybjref pna uryc – nal gnxref?

{{Translation of response:

Alright, so first, I want to thank you because this was a reality check against my suppositions. The statement as I originally made it doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny; not just in cases like yours but in even the most mainstream taste. Fantasies aren’t reality or even a poor version of reality, and there are plenty of cases where they’re actively better; certainly the badness doesn’t flow over: it would be an unusual monamorous person who didn’t sometimes fantasize about other people, even though cheating is wrong; the bloodlust indulged in shooters or megalomania in strategy games would be dangerous in another context but fine in it, and so on. I won’t say it never carries over as an iron principle but certainly I wouldn’t look at an inflation fetish askance in the same way I might someone with elaborate fantasies of torturing strangers to death, even though actually inflating someone would be bad, as you note. I like grimdark RPGs and they’re their own good thing and not a pale reflection of actual grim darkness, which is bad.

What I think I would still stand by is that I think pornography, at the very least in the modal case, is a superstimulus in a way I see kind of everything trending towards. Pornography is probably less dangerous than most other superstimuli of this sort because unless you go off the deep end you’re not spending forever on it, although I think there’s an incentive gradient towards that. When my dad came over he would just lay on the couch and watch Fail Army videos for hours; obviously there’s a bigger issue there with like workplace exhaustion (dude needs to retire) but it seems worse.

Or to put it more concretely and limiting things to my own case, I think my own stimulus (har) to quit porn cold turkey was like discovering on reddit these like progressively more and more efficient delivery mechanisms, from aminaked of my youth which would collate pics from other sites on to the tube sites and redditp and redditlist for discovery until there was just one where it machine learninged what you upvoted and showed you more and more of that, and I decided, “fuck, I’ve always been bad at self-control, I’m no match for this.” I don’t like the medicalizing language of “addiction” but there is definitely a phenomenology of “huh I wish I hadn’t done so much of that, how can I make myself feel better about it oh x” which I still feel about a lot of things okay mostly social media with likes. (Hence why I reincarnate here so often. Which I think has actually worked out pretty well – if I had been steadily accumulating followers here for a decade I think that level of exposure would be bad.)

(Anyway a couple years later and the scary porn delivery mechanism is now the exact model young people use to discover all media, lol! Hope that goes well.)

Keeping up with this swearing off of porn has been tough this past half year where my partner aren’t quite as matched in libido as we used to be, but those things fluctuate and tbh the idea of a “streak” can be its own gamified motivation, and sometimes when I’m trying to give myself a pep talk that I’m more capable than I give myself credit for that’s what I’ll cite, on my own for-internal-use resume.

Anyway you were probably hoping for some IRL inflation tips which I’m not qualified to give. (I could ask ChatGPT, but so could you, and I definitely wouldn’t want to say anything about the medical advisability of anything it suggested! Funny one to imagine using the grandma exploit on though lol.) But maybe my followers can help – any takers?}}

I do think the one defensible motivation for regulating porn (beyond the obvious workplace safety and consent issues) is the porn-as-superstimulus hypothesis, but the issue is, as you note, it’s no more a superstimulus than, like, most of the consumer entertainment economy these days, so for consistency’s sake you’d have to crack down on most everything. And maybe that’s a bullet people are willing to bite, but what doesn’t make sense is singling out porn as a unique category of evil.

I will say that the expansion of gambling (esp. sports gambling and mobile gacha) recently has been much more of a mess than I possibly-naively assumed it would be, and I have moved in the direction of being more willing to take a hard line against superstimuli than I was a couple years ago. But with pornography I don’t see any plausible regulation mechanism that doesn’t burn down a bunch of licit creative expression, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

I wrote this in tag register but it turned out *way* too long to fit in the tags, so here we go:

#I’ve been thinking about this kind of thing lately

#how in a lot of ways I’ve so far gotten off lightly

#(…so to speak)

#by‚ like‚ running the brain equivalent of Solaris

#approximately nobody bothers to write malware specifically targeted at me

#occasionally I encounter stuff broad-spectrum enough to hit me

#–I generally have to avoid letting potato chips into the house–

#but there’s so much that just whooshes right by

#(also…a while back a mobile-game company attempted to bribe me to try their freemium casino)

#(I did try it‚ because I could really do with the bribe money and I knew I could refrain from microtransactions)

#(and wow it is *incredibly* fucking disturbing just how optimised for addictiveness that fucking thing is)

#(like‚ I could feel myself having a memetic immune response to it)

#(“playing” that “game” was miserable‚ in the way that a fever is miserable)

#((let’s see who burns first, motherfucker))

#(on day 2 I bailed on the agreement)

#(they’d offered me sixty honest-to-God actual Canadian dollars)

#(–bear in mind that for sufficiently easy work‚ the wage at which I am ambivalent about whether to take a gig is about $1.50 an hour–)

#(and *that was not enough to be worth further exposure to that Hell*)

#((I am torn on whether to read Addiction by Design or whether it would just fill me with despair))

#“we’ll increasingly be defined by what we say no to‚” I recently read in a post from 2010

#( http://www.paulgraham.com/addiction.html )

#((“the last thing I want is for the Internet to follow me out into the world‚” he also said‚ on why he didn’t own a smartphone))

#((which on the one hand sure is a thing I have heard a lot of horror stories about))

#((and on the other hand smartphones are not in fact a package deal))

#((months after I wrote it‚ I still occasionally have people come up to me and thank me for my post on offline-first smartphone setups))

#(((we had a lovely chat about Graphene)))

#anyway‚ as I was saying a few months ago

#as the process of optimisation becomes increasingly automated‚ it becomes possible to efficiently target smaller and smaller niches

#I live in a world in which the main limiting factor on how many works of pornography I can read is how many *exist*

#and in which the process of exploration is inherently aversive because statistically almost all attempts dredge up only bad works

#and all but one attempt‚ ever‚ has dredged up at most okay works

#a machine-learning upvote algorithm simply wouldn’t have enough to work with

#it’s a very different world from the one Oligo lives in

#I’m not adapted to his world

#(I mean nobody really is‚ that’s the point‚ but me less than most)

#kind of scared of the prospect of joining him there

#(I suppose I do have the advantage of an estrogen-dominant hormonal profile)

#((I’m ovulating as I write this and I have been feeling so much pity for people who are *stuck* being fertile *all of the time*‚ holy shit))

#(…but pornography‚ the actual well-done stuff‚ *itself* heightens the libido)

#(like for *days* afterward)

#(I really did not expect how affecting it would be on that front)

#((although I guess maybe I should have; maybe it’s not actually so different from general lingering effects of fiction?))

#((…mind you‚ there were a bunch of complaints when access to novels first became widespread that boiled down to “they’re superstimuli’‘‚ weren’t there))

#(like on the one hand it’s good‚ if I *want* a higher libido‚ to have options less invasive and with fewer side effects than sleep deprivation)

#(but it was also a little unnerving and seems like it might have the potential for a vicious cycle)

#((…although in fairness it turns out that the feeling of looking at a notification email for a new porn chapter is *very different* from the feeling of looking at a bag of potato chips in my cupboard))

#((something to look forward to for later‚ rather than something tempting in the moment))

#((so that seems hopeful))


Tags:

#reply via reblog #tag rambles #sexuality and lack thereof #people who can distinguish between their drive for sleep and drive for sex fascinate me #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #disappointed permanent resident of The Future #nsfw text #drugs cw? #gambling


{{next post in sequence}}

sigmaleph:

latest bout of ‘are people much better than me at this or just way overconfident about it’: how do you even know how long it takes you to fall sleep. like. basically by definition you’re not paying attention by the time it happens, it seems like it should be really hard to have anything like an accurate measure of it. sure you can tell the difference between an hour and a minute but i see people reporting numbers with granularity in the minutes and i have no idea how they could possibly know. unless they had a sleep test i guess, someone else doing the measuring for them, but then why would you ask other people and expect that same granularity? surely the default answer is ‘i don’t know’.

there’s the whole paradoxical insomnia thing, people who report they haven’t slept at all or slept very little but have in fact slept, which i think is evidence for ‘they are just overconfident’. people can say ‘i barely slept’ when they had several hours of sleep, because the borders of sleep and wakefulness are inherently fuzzy from the inside.

Fitness-tracker wristbands? Those alarm-clock apps that decide when (within a given window) to wake you based on how much you’re moving around and therefore how lightly you’re asleep?

(not to say that there isn’t *also* a lot of overconfidence going on, but very basic sleep tests are a lot more practical than they used to be)


Tags:

#I don’t *super* trust Sleep Cycle’s graph of what times I was asleep #I *know* I’ve seen it fail to recognise times that I woke up in the middle of the night #but there’s something to be said for it and I wouldn’t be surprised if‚ like‚ some mattresses work better for it than others #reply via reblog #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #amnesia cw?

sigmaleph:

sometimes people are like “yeah this person was terrible at [art form] here look at the evidence to prove it” and link to something i find completely indistinguishable from highly-celebrated award-winning examples of the same kind of art

i appreciate it. helps me calibrate.

garmbreak1:

is this about hitler

sigmaleph:

no. i have no idea what people think of hitler as a painter.

phaeton-flier:

For whatever reason it’s not usually what people judge him by.

sigmaleph:

4b17efd9639d1fe0244c8f206c490a9937eb6668

brosetv:

I assume this is about Rebecca Black’s FRIDAY which everyone said was horrible, unlike any other pop song of the time that was mass-produced and therefor “good”

sigmaleph:

that is a very specific assumption to make! it was not what I had in mind, no.

mkaiww:

what were you thinking of?

sigmaleph:

various examples of people being described as terrible poets, most recently Samuel Derrick


Tags:

#I enjoy the fact that I actually did know exactly what this post is vaguing about #( https://thingofthings.substack.com/p/weird-people-of-history-samuel-derrick ) #((it’s not a secret: OP linked it in another branch)) #I did think the poem was bad but #(a) I’m not sure how much of that was priming and #(b) I would not be surprised if there are many highly-regarded poems that are (to me) equally bad #also back in the day I listened to ”Friday” without knowing its reputation because someone asked me what colour it was #and I could not finish it #so there’s that #art #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #Nazi cw? #this probably deserves some other warning tag but I am not sure what #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

foxes-in-love:

9024b5b3cce1664c0a208a2887ce1a32579021a2

Tags:

#yeah‚ yeah‚ the frisson‚ we’ve all seen it #(I looked through the notes and *most* people there know what Green is talking about‚ but a significant minority don’t) #(personally I do have the thing) #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #comics #art #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

sigmaleph:

you are offered a choice:

  1. You get to open a video-game style character creation screen and customise your body at will, to anything within range of human variation (no cat ears, sorry). This includes letting you set a new biological age, get rid of any physical health issues, and so on. Your new appearance seems unremarkable to anyone who knows you, all government databases with your picture are adjusted, etc.
  2. You get 150 000 USD every year for the rest of your life without having to do anything for it. You don’t pay taxes on this money, it adjusts with inflation automatically, it appears entirely legitimate to any authorities, etc.

what do you choose, and also, are you trans or cis (if you’re tempted to answer ‘it’s complicated’, round off to trans)?

Choose:

character-creation-vs-150k-poll

My tag ramble was so long that Tumblr cut it off (apparently the current limit is 30 tags), so I’m dumping it into the main post body:

#I’ve been wavering on whether to reblog this for ages

#I felt kind of bad about piling on to Sofi’s notespam like that

#but it being context for the next post has pushed me over into “yes”

#I didn’t realise until after voting that the character creation is one-time-only rather than ongoing access

#which makes the correct answer less *obvious*

#but I stand by my vote of cis | character creation

#(as it happens I *am* considering doing a second puberty through this‚ but they’d both be estrogenic)

#(honestly I’d barely even need the magic ID updating)

#(29-year-old me in 12-year-old me’s body could pass for 29 about as well as I could in 29-year-old body)

#(the two mes look pretty much the same: it’s all a matter of how you act)

#((well‚ 12-year-old me was a little smaller‚ but within the adult range and her face was already more or less stable))

#(((ooh‚ I bet I could tweak it so that I *stay* five-foot-one this time around)))

#(((during my first puberty my body map never updated for my final growth spurt‚ and

#I’m not *dysphoric* about being two inches too tall‚ but it does get a bit disorienting sometimes)))

#anyway my point there is that…a lot of people in the notes are going “money can be exchanged for goods and services”

#but I think in this case that’s actually backwards

#while money and health do both feed into each other

#health can be exchanged for money to a much greater degree than money can be exchanged for health

#money can *maybe* buy you the *appearance* of 9 – 17

#–(depending on how much puberty I can get away with doing again without fucking up my brain)–

#more years of youth‚ but it won’t buy you the lifespan nor the functionality of it

#money can buy you the ability to *breathe* your homeworld’s atmosphere even during pollen season

#and enough of it can buy you the ability to *talk* while breathing it

#but it can’t really buy you the ability to eat and drink while breathing it‚ and that’s a significant handicap in itself

#(not to mention the street harassment you get wearing a prosthetic immune system (to keep your built-in immune system from freaking out))

#likewise‚ money can buy disease *prevention*‚ but not the ability to shrug it off once you’ve caught it

#the ability of money to buy more robust bones is extremely limited

#(have I ever broken a bone? no! but why settle for merely *adequate* bone strength when I can have *optimal* bone strength?)

#((…god‚ why is anyone who is not *actively dying* for want of resources taking the money over the health))

#((I was so very aware‚ that time last year that a ventilation floor grate broke beneath me‚ that if I’d been 80 I would have *died*))

#((but I was 28‚ and I got away without even a broken bone))

#((why would you give that up any more than you have to))

#the list goes on

#meanwhile‚ health can buy you a nice steady low-non-physical-barrier-to-entry job as a farmhand or dockworker

#(not *as* steady as magic income‚ yes‚ and I *do* care a great deal about that‚ but I care about health *more*)

#and I’m not altruistic enough to take more money than I need so that I can give the rest away‚ not given what else is on offer


Tags:

#reply via reblog #tag rambles #surveys #transhumanism #gender #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #adventures in human capitalism #aging cw #death tw #poison cw? #injury cw #illness tw?


{{next post in sequence}}

tanadrin:

An evil wizard holds you at gunpoint and requires you to choose one of the following emotions to lose forever. You will not feel the faintest trace of it ever again. Which do you pick?

evil-wizard-negative-emotion-poll

tanadrin:

Mildly surprised by the results of this poll, given that it’s a dead heat between the three for me. I suppose it shouldn’t be entirely surprising that shame wins, since it is in some ways a very social emotion, and how others perceive us (and our worries about how they perceive us) occupies a lot of our thoughts. But though I would gladly dispense with all three emotions, if I somehow could, a small sense of shame seems the most useful, since it is at least sometimes a useful key to whether others might be put off or annoyed by our actions.

jadagul:

I’m confused by the idea that this is an evil wizard. Losing shame and losing anger both seem clearly net positive to me?

kata4a:

oh wow. fear and shame both seem straightforwardly useful to me in a way that anger does not

apricops:

“What could possibly go wrong with losing my sense of shame,” I say five minutes before shitting myself in public

tanadrin:

There was a woman born with a congenital condition that prevents her feeling fear interviewed on, I think Radiolab a while back; something that struck me about the interview was that feeling no fear didn’t interfere with her life 99% of the time; it certainly didn’t make her more inclined to play in traffic as a kid or anything. Her cognitive ability to predict and avoid harm was perfectly intact. They did indicate (though did not really detail) that there were a handful of occasions in her life where a lack of being able to feel fear led her into riskier situations, but this was more akin to what a naive or trusting person might experience–if anything, someone who feels no fear would be less likely to be, say, an adrenaline junkie who takes risks because they experience a fear response in a particular way.

I think if you were cognitively normal except unable to experience shame, you probably wouldn’t shit your pants more often in public (so to speak); you would retain your ability to predict which situations might cause you to accrue negative social capital and to avoid them. I think a lot of what fear and shame (and all our other emotions do) is help us cache those calculations, or reinforce the desire to avoid behaviors, but we don’t depend on them to act like, in basically sane and rational ways. If you had no trace of shame I do expect your behavior would be at least a little different, unless it was really working hard to restrain some deeply unpopular compulsion, but I don’t think it would actively incentivize acting in weird ways.

discoursedrome:

more than anything else this poll made me feel perplexed about how different I am than others. I picked anger because it seems, like, really obviously the best choice, but it’s the least popular! Shame and fear are both defensive emotions, in the sense that they’re designed to protect you from threats, but anger is largely an offensive emotion; I’m much more concerned about compromising my defensive capabilities than my offensive ones, since society doesn’t feel like the kind of situation where you can just plow through everything with a strong preemptive assault. I think maybe the square-jawed dynastic banker guys can pull that off, which is why they do so much cocaine? But it’s not, like, usual. Having no sense of anger feels much safer than the other two.

I suppose the results are complicated by people’s individual tendencies, though, too. Someone who has way too much of a particular thing would probably be biased to get rid of it, so at least some of this might be that the reclusive tunnel-dwellers of Tumblr have more fear and shame than anger on the balance.

togglessymposium:

Anger is absolutely a useful, load-bearing element of my life. It’s motive, in a way that the others are not; it’s one of the basic things that distinguishes between the world I live in and the world as I want it to be. Reducing that better world to a mere ‘would be nice’ is… extremely disturbing to me.

So I guess I can agree that it’s ‘safer’ to get rid of anger, in that it’s not likely to result in dangerous situations for you or anybody else. But it’s also a life of extreme complacency, in a way that’s directly counter to many of my core values. Without anger, there’s no sense of unfairness; without unfairness, there’s no aspiration to justice. Most notably, I really hate death, to the point of being slightly loony about it- without that, I’m fairly sure my baseline personality would look very different.

Man, reading this thread makes me feel like one of those colourblind people wondering why people are making such a big deal about subtle variations in shades of brownish-gray.

I read through the notes, and almost *every* example that *every* person brings up for *every* emotion on this list parses as fear to me.

I’m reblogging this particular version primarily because of how surprising it is to see someone describe the-painful-awareness-of-the-gap-between-how-the-world-is-and-how-it-ought-to-be as *anger*, when as I experience it…okay, some of it is disgust† and a fair bit of it is simply pain (which is not exactly an emotion per se), but the rest is basically a *central example* of fear to me.

By the time I saw this post it was too late to vote on it, but I’d have gone with anger. I can’t say I’d be *fully* comfortable with “dealing with my inability to (safely, ethically, etc) satisfy my bloodlust†† by cutting it out of my soul”, but I have to admit it *would* be the most practical approach.

(I’m not going with shame because I absolutely do not understand what it would mean to cut out shame but leave fear intact, and I’m not fucking with that. At least there is *a* thing that it would mean to me to cut out anger while leaving the others, even if I’m not drawing that line in the same place as anyone else.)

†shitting myself in public would *also* be disgust, BTW: shitting myself in private does not seem like it would be significantly less unpleasant modulo bathroom access

††I cannot *begin* to wrap my head around what “non-violent anger” would be like as a quale, I suppose next you’re going to tell me eths can be placed at the ends of syllables


Tags:

#this also happens a lot when people are talking about sadness #reply via reblog #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #anger management #surveys #unsanitary cw #violence cw? #this probably deserves some other warning tag but I am not sure what

opossumhead:

How do you pronounce “??” In your head on its own?

question-mark-pronunciation-poll


Tags:

#I don’t know how to verbally describe the sound effect #nor do I know of a good way to find or make a similar-sounding recording #surveys #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #language

sigmaleph:

you guys are reading emails?

I am seeing polls like this one and like. the number of unread emails in my inbox is definitely in the hundreds and getting a more precise upper bound requires trusting gmail not to lie to me because it only loads emails in sets of fifty at a time. I do not, in fact, trust gmail not to lie to me about this, because they often do. doesn’t matter. anyway.

like. 99% of the email i get is

  1. we’re updating our terms of service!
  2. thing you were following updated!
  3. confirmation email from an online purchase!
  4. social media notification!
  5. spam from companies i can’t block because they don’t distinguish their spam emails from their actual useful emails!

and things like that. i don’t read those emails, in the sense of ‘click through so they are no longer marked unread’. i read the subject line, which tells me all i need to know. if it’s a notification on my phone sometimes i remember to quick-archive it because there’s a convenient button for it. then it accumulates as detritus on my inbox until it becomes relevant later on or i do an archiving sweep every few months.

Nothing in my main two email inboxes (one for Brin and one for legal-name stuff) is marked unread, though…*counts*…for my legal-name email around 15 are emails that I have not literally read (4 where the title alone tells me everything I need to know from it, the other 11 mostly newsletters or discussion of upcoming volunteer events), plus another 6 that I’ve read but have not finished acting upon. Brin has 3 inbox emails, all of them AO3 updates.

If an email is *marked* unread *and* in the inbox, that means it’s new enough that I haven’t even glanced at the title yet. Newsletters that I traditionally read over lunch (rather than whenever I get around to it) get moved to their own folders and *then* re-marked unread until I actually read them: I have 31 unread Canadian Accountant newsletters and 1 unread Money Stuff.

Most emails I move to one of several folders (options include, but are not limited to, “Other” and Trash) on a scale of hours after getting them. The ones that require more work to sort, like the ones that are in there right now, I do…well, *most* of them around once or twice a month (with the occasional smaller sweep in-between), but things that involve watching videos often take months or years.

I communicate with my parents over email pretty much every day.


Tags:

#reply via reblog #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #101 Uses for Infrastructureless Computers