{{previous post in sequence}}


(*digs post out of drafts, finishes writing it*)

Can anyone think of a social-justice anthem (generalised anti-bigotry preferred; failing that, feminism-focused) with a line involving the word “home”? Where “home” refers to, like, the post-bigotry utopia the songwriter wants to bring about*, or the community of universal sisterhood, or something like that, rather than the dystopic kyriarchy of one’s presumed birth.

I want a category tag for talking about social justice as a culture (rather than an ideology), and I’d like it to match my other homeland tags.

*However, the specific “home” line should not refer to it as not currently existing.


Tags:

#oh look an original post #I tried Seanan McGuire’s ”Wicked Girls” and every SJ-y Phil Collins song in my collection #none of them had anything suitable #(though if I can’t find a home line I might consider ”our roads may be golden or broken or lost”) #(although you’d need to imagine ”or broken or lost” said in a much more bitter tone) #(the following category tag was added retroactively:) #our roads may be golden or broken or lost #(spoilers)


{{next post in sequence}}

The Rationalist Stereotype Survey

{{previous post in sequence}}


socialjusticemunchkin:

Now with a scoring guide (choose one or none from each sub-category)

Age:

  • 21-25 years +1
  • 16-20 +½
  • 26-30 years +½

Jewishness:

  • Yes +1
  • Kind of + ½

Gender:

  • trans woman (regardless of hormone usage) +1
  • any kind of amab using estrogen +1
  • amab non-binary (no estrogen) +¾
  • other non-cis or dubiously cis (afab trans, agender, magic button trans, etc.) +½
  • cis by default (not magic button trans) +¼

Poly:

  • Yes +1
  • Kind of, or open to the idea +½

Sexuality, part A:

  • gray-asexual or demisexual +1
  • asexual +½
  • asexual and kinky +1
  • kinky +½

Sexuality, part B (replace “sexual” with “romantic” if doing so would give you a higher score):

  • bisexual, pansexual, sapiosexual, any other kind of “gender isn’t really such a big deal”sexual +1
  • any kind of “gender isn’t a massive deal but it’s somewhat of a deal”sexual +½
  • gendersexual, but would take the bisexuality pill +½

Gifted child:

  • very +½ (eg. peerless in one’s childhood environment, or not peerless, but with a highly unusual peer group)
  • quite +¼ (eg. one of the highest-achieving in one’s slightly less highly unusual peer group)

Badbrains:

  • at least 2 of: ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression at least to a sub-clinical but noticeable degree +½
  • one of them +¼

Field:

  • CS student, or working in programming, AI, CS, etc. +1
  • self-learning any of the above +½
  • student or working in mathematics +½

Politics, part 1:

  • supports open borders, or at least massively increased immigration +½
  • supports significantly increased immigration +¼

Politics, part 2:

  • supports basic income by whatever name one wishes to use +½
  • supports some other kind of less bureaucratic, more market-based approach to welfare +¼

Politics, extra questions (can’t increase the total politics score over 1):

  • refuses to identify with ideological labels +½
  • identifies with a weird made-up “non-“ideological label +½ (“futarchy”, “meta-level politics”, etc.)

Geeking out:

  • transhumanist nerd stuff +1
  • any other uncommon and specific nerd stuff +1
  • less unusual SF/F or STEM nerd stuff +½

HPMoR, 3 Worlds Collide, Dragon-Tyrant (add scores from each):

  • has read all of it, or most and intends to finish +1/3
  • has read a lot but doesn’t intend to finish, or is starting +1/6

SSC:

  • regularly +1
  • sometimes +½
  • rarely +¼

I tried to not break legacy results compatibility so most people’s scores should be the same and this would just clarify the questionnaire; if people’s results change, it’s because I’ve changed some things to better reflect the original intent based on data acquired so far (looking especially at you, @sigmaleph, because that “politics” answer was the most stereotypical rationalist thing ever and I’m embarrassed to have overlooked that possibility)

 

socialjusticemunchkin:

And now I have the result categories as well:

(break ties with Newcomb’s dilemma; one-boxers upwards, two-boxers downwards)

12: The Chosen One

10-12: True Yudbot of the Hivemind

8-10: Stereotypical Rationalist

6-8: Typical Rationalist

4-6: Quite rationalist-adjacent

2-4: Kind of adjacent I guess

0-2: I don’t know how you ended up taking the survey, please tell me your story

 

ilzolende:

Taking the revised survey!

0.5 age, 1 Jewishness, 0.25 gender, 1 poly, proooobably 2 sexuality, 0.25 gifted, 0.25 badbrains, 1 CS, (tentatively) 0.5 immigration, (tentatively) 0.5 basic income, 1 transhumanist nerdery, 1 fiction, 1 SSC, putting me at… 10.25.

[attaches “True Yudbot of the Hivemind” keychain to keyring, which even without that has more random keychains than it does useful items]

 

the-grey-tribe:

I wonder if the Jewishness in the rationalist community is just confirmation bias, Jews inviting people from their peer group to join tumblr, or a memetic influence of Jewish scholarship. Like Saul Kripke’s direct reference theory, which applies principles from rabbinic literature and scholarship to the semantics of human language.

 

brin-bellway:

I kind of figured it’s because Jews and rationalists have similar taste in fiction. I mean, that’s probably not all there is to it, but Luminosity (the first ratfic I read, and so the one where I wasn’t judging it in comparison to other ratfic) definitely reminded me of the books of Jewish folktales I had as a kid. (“Clever, genre-savvy protagonist achieves goals by exploiting loopholes in the laws of nature.”)

 

justice-turtle:

6.5 typical rationalist, unless I subtract the scores for every “I have no idea what this is” answer, which puts me at a more likely 3.66 vaguely adjacent. ^_^ Lower if “probably Jewish-descended but not at all culturally Jewish” doesn’t count as “kind of”.

(Not really sure what rationalism entails, but I can’t resist a good quiz with scoring, especially when I’m putting off getting ready for school. XD)

Yeah, “kind of adjacent I guess” sounds more like you, since AFAIK you don’t follow anyone relevant other than me.

Not really sure what rationalism entails

(Disclaimer: while I have over a year’s experience now, I’m not some kind of Official Expert or anything, etc etc)

You’ll still find people claiming rationalism is an ideology–to be fair, the label is a legacy from when this was the case–but IME these tend to be non-rationalists from subcultures that think of themselves as ideologies first and cultures never (*cough*socialjustice*cough*). (Which reminds me…but that’s another post. I’ll dig it out of my drafts and finish writing it next.)

Rationalist Tumblr is a social group: a collection of people who generally recognise each other’s usernames and have varying amounts of readership, friendship and frequently (but not necessarily) romance with each other. (A large chunk of the rationalist-sphere consists of a single, complexly interconnected polycule, hence polyamory being listed above as a stereotype.) As a general rule, they enjoy nerding out on transhumanism and philosophy, and can often be found debating ethical thought experiments for fun. Somehow, despite a tendency to treat arguing with someone as a friendly greeting, they manage to be pretty welcoming and reassuring to conflict-avoidant people who are used to walking on eggshells. Maybe it’s the lampshading.

They descend from the commentariat of the blog Less Wrong, but while a modern-day member of the community is expected to be aware of Less Wrong’s existence and have some passing familiarity with the archive (one need not have this passing familiarity upon joining; links will come up during the abovementioned ethical thought experiments), being or having ever been a regular reader of Less Wrong is not required, and one certainly doesn’t have to agree with LW’s stances on things.

You’d probably recognise some of the names yourself, given that…let me go check…yes, all ten of my last ten reblogs were from rationalists. (Admittedly, six of those ten were @lizardywizard. I seem to be on a lizardywizard streak. These things happen.)

(SSC is short for Slate Star Codex, popular blog amongst the community (written by a community member), and source of intriguing-but-usually-tentative ideas and interesting links.)

Personally, I put myself down as “kind of” Jewish when calculating the numbers in the tags of my last post. I expect I could make a good case for being straight-up Jewish, but I don’t want to, and I think that’s telling in itself.


Tags:

#reply via reblog


{{next post in sequence}}

The Rationalist Stereotype Survey

the-grey-tribe:

ilzolende:

socialjusticemunchkin:

socialjusticemunchkin:

Now with a scoring guide (choose one or none from each sub-category)

Age:

  • 21-25 years +1
  • 16-20 +½
  • 26-30 years +½

Jewishness:

  • Yes +1
  • Kind of + ½

Gender:

  • trans woman (regardless of hormone usage) +1
  • any kind of amab using estrogen +1
  • amab non-binary (no estrogen) +¾
  • other non-cis or dubiously cis (afab trans, agender, magic button trans, etc.) +½
  • cis by default (not magic button trans) +¼

Poly:

  • Yes +1
  • Kind of, or open to the idea +½

Sexuality, part A:

  • gray-asexual or demisexual +1
  • asexual +½
  • asexual and kinky +1
  • kinky +½

Sexuality, part B (replace “sexual” with “romantic” if doing so would give you a higher score):

  • bisexual, pansexual, sapiosexual, any other kind of “gender isn’t really such a big deal”sexual +1
  • any kind of “gender isn’t a massive deal but it’s somewhat of a deal”sexual +½
  • gendersexual, but would take the bisexuality pill +½

Gifted child:

  • very +½ (eg. peerless in one’s childhood environment, or not peerless, but with a highly unusual peer group)
  • quite +¼ (eg. one of the highest-achieving in one’s slightly less highly unusual peer group)

Badbrains:

  • at least 2 of: ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression at least to a sub-clinical but noticeable degree +½
  • one of them +¼

Field:

  • CS student, or working in programming, AI, CS, etc. +1
  • self-learning any of the above +½
  • student or working in mathematics +½

Politics, part 1:

  • supports open borders, or at least massively increased immigration +½
  • supports significantly increased immigration +¼

Politics, part 2:

  • supports basic income by whatever name one wishes to use +½
  • supports some other kind of less bureaucratic, more market-based approach to welfare +¼

Politics, extra questions (can’t increase the total politics score over 1):

  • refuses to identify with ideological labels +½
  • identifies with a weird made-up “non-“ideological label +½ (“futarchy”, “meta-level politics”, etc.)

Geeking out:

  • transhumanist nerd stuff +1
  • any other uncommon and specific nerd stuff +1
  • less unusual SF/F or STEM nerd stuff +½

HPMoR, 3 Worlds Collide, Dragon-Tyrant (add scores from each):

  • has read all of it, or most and intends to finish +1/3
  • has read a lot but doesn’t intend to finish, or is starting +1/6

SSC:

  • regularly +1
  • sometimes +½
  • rarely +¼

I tried to not break legacy results compatibility so most people’s scores should be the same and this would just clarify the questionnaire; if people’s results change, it’s because I’ve changed some things to better reflect the original intent based on data acquired so far (looking especially at you, @sigmaleph, because that “politics” answer was the most stereotypical rationalist thing ever and I’m embarrassed to have overlooked that possibility)

And now I have the result categories as well:

(break ties with Newcomb’s dilemma; one-boxers upwards, two-boxers downwards)

12: The Chosen One

10-12: True Yudbot of the Hivemind

8-10: Stereotypical Rationalist

6-8: Typical Rationalist

4-6: Quite rationalist-adjacent

2-4: Kind of adjacent I guess

0-2: I don’t know how you ended up taking the survey, please tell me your story

Taking the revised survey!

0.5 age, 1 Jewishness, 0.25 gender, 1 poly, proooobably 2 sexuality, 0.25 gifted, 0.25 badbrains, 1 CS, (tentatively) 0.5 immigration, (tentatively) 0.5 basic income, 1 transhumanist nerdery, 1 fiction, 1 SSC, putting me at… 10.25.

[attaches “True Yudbot of the Hivemind” keychain to keyring, which even without that has more random keychains than it does useful items]

I wonder if the Jewishness in the rationalist community is just confirmation bias, Jews inviting people from their peer group to join tumblr, or a memetic influence of Jewish scholarship. Like Saul Kripke’s direct reference theory, which applies principles from rabbinic literature and scholarship to the semantics of human language.

I kind of figured it’s because Jews and rationalists have similar taste in fiction. I mean, that’s probably not all there is to it, but Luminosity (the first ratfic I read, and so the one where I wasn’t judging it in comparison to other ratfic) definitely reminded me of the books of Jewish folktales I had as a kid. (“Clever, genre-savvy protagonist achieves goals by exploiting loopholes in the laws of nature.”)


Tags:

#I get 7 and 1/6 with a very conservative reading of the checklist #8 and 5/12 with a less conservative reading #(the other 1.25 is ”pan-kinky” and ”maybe probably qualifies as having anxiety”) #(a *remarkable* number of people have gendered kink preferences) #(this confuses me greatly)


{{next post in sequence}}

kyraneko:

fortheloveofplaid:

the most implausible thing about superhero movies is that these guys make their own suits, like seriously those toxic chemicals did NOT give you the ability to sew stretch knits, do you even own a serger

I feel like there’s this little secret place in the middle of some seedy New York business neighborhood, back room, doesn’t even have a sign on the door, but within three days of using their powers in public or starting a pattern of vigilanteism, every budding superhero or supervillain gets discreetly handed a scrap of paper with that address written on it.

Inside there’s this little tea table with three chairs, woodstove, minifridge, work table, sewing machines, bolts and bolts of stretch fabrics and maybe some kevlar, and two middle-aged women with matching wedding rings and sketchbooks.

And they invite you to sit down, and give you tea and cookies, and start making sketches of what you want your costume to look like, and you get measured, and told to come back in a week, and there’s your costume, waiting for you.

The first one is free. They tell you the price of subsequent ones, and it’s based on what you can afford. You have no idea how they found out about your financial situation. You try it on, and it fits perfectly, and you have no idea how they managed that without measuring you a whole lot more thoroughly than they did.

They ask you to pose for a picture with them. For their album, they say. The camera is old, big, the sort film camera artists hunt down at antique stores and pay thousands for, and they come pose on either side of you and one of them clicks the camera remotely by way of one of those squeeze-things on a cable that you’ve seen depicted from olden times. That one (the tall one, you think, though she isn’t really, thin and reminiscent of a Greek marble statue) pulls the glass plate from the camera and scurries off to the basement, while the other one (shorter, round, all smiles, her shiny black hair pulled up into a bun) brings out a photo album to show you their work.

Inside it is … everyone. Superheroes. Supervillains. Household names and people you don’t recognize. She flips through pages at random, telling you little bits about the guy in the purple spangly costume, the lady in red and black, the mysterious cloaked figure whose mask reveals one eye. As she pages back, the costumes start looking really convincingly retro, and her descriptions start having references to the Space Race, the Depression, the Great War.

The other lady comes up, holding your picture. You’re sort of surprised to find it’s in color, and then you realize all the others were, too, even the earliest ones. There you are, and you look like a superhero. You look down at yourself, and feel like a superhero. You stand up straighter, and the costume suddenly fits a tiny bit better, and they both smile proudly.

*

The next time you come in, it’s because the person who’s probably going to be your nemesis has shredded your costume. You bring the agreed-upon price, and you bake cupcakes to share with them. There’s a third woman there, and you don’t recognize her, but the way she moves is familiar somehow, and the air seems to sparkle around her, on the edge of frost or the edge of flame. She’s carrying a wrapped brown paper package in her arms, and she smiles at you and moves to depart. You offer her a cupcake for the road.

The two seamstresses go into transports of delight over the cupcakes. You drink tea, and eat cookies and a piece of a pie someone brought around yesterday. They examine your costume and suggest a layer of kevlar around the shoulders and torso, since you’re facing off with someone who uses claws.

They ask you how the costume has worked, contemplate small design changes, make sketches. They tell you a story about their second wedding that has you falling off the chair in tears, laughing so hard your stomach hurts. They were married in 1906, they say, twice. They took turns being the man. They joke about how two one-ring ceremonies make one two-ring ceremony, and figure that they each had one wedding because it only counted when they were the bride. 

They point you at three pictures on the wall. A short round man with an impressive beard grins next to a taller, white-gowned goddess; a thin man in top hat and tails looks adoringly down at a round and beaming bride; two women, in their wedding dresses, clasp each other close and smile dazzlingly at the camera. The other two pictures show the sanctuaries of different churches; this one was clearly taken in this room.

There’s a card next to what’s left of the pie. Elaborate silver curlicues on white, and it originally said “Happy 10th Anniversary,” only someone has taken a Sharpie and shoehorned in an extra 1, so it says “Happy 110th.” The tall one follows your gaze, tells you, morning wedding and evening wedding, same day. She picks up the card and sets it upright; you can see the name signed inside: Magneto.

You notice that scattered on their paperwork desk are many more envelopes and cards, and are glad you decided to bring the cupcakes.

*

When you pick up your costume the next time, it’s wrapped up in paper and string. You don’t need to try it on; there’s no way it won’t be perfect. You drink tea, eat candies like your grandmother used to make when you were small, talk about your nights out superheroing and your nemesis and your calculus homework and how today’s economy compares with the later years of the Depression.

When you leave, you meet a man in the alleyway. He’s big, and he radiates danger, but his eyes shift from you to the package in your arms, and he nods slightly and moves past you. You’re not the slightest bit surprised when he goes into the same door you came out of.

*

The next time you visit, there’s nothing wrong with your costume but you think it might be wise to have a spare. And also, you want to thank them for the kevlar. You bring artisan sodas, the kind you buy in glass bottles, and they give you stir fry, cooked on the wood-burning stove in a wok that looks a century old.

There’s no way they could possibly know that your day job cut your hours, but they give you a discount that suits you perfectly. Halfway through dinner, a cinderblock of a man comes in the door, and the shorter lady brings up an antique-looking bottle of liquor to pour into his tea. You catch a whiff and it makes your eyes water. The tall one sees your face, and grins, and says, Prohibition. 

You’re not sure whether the liquor is that old, or whether they’ve got a still down in the basement with their photography darkroom. Either seems completely plausible. The four of you have a rousing conversation about the merits of various beverages over dinner, and then you leave him to do business with the seamstresses.

*

It’s almost a year later, and you’re on your fifth costume, when you see the gangly teenager chase off a trio of would-be purse-snatchers with a grace of movement that can only be called superhuman.

You take pen and paper from one of your multitude of convenient hidden pockets, and scribble down an address. With your own power and the advantage of practice, it’s easy to catch up with her, and the work of an instant to slip the paper into her hand.

*

A week or so later, you’re drinking tea and comparing Supreme Court Justices past and present when she comes into the shop, and her brow furrows a bit, like she remembers you but can’t figure out from where. The ladies welcome her, and you push the tray of cookies towards her and head out the door.

In the alleyway you meet that same giant menacing man you’ve seen once before. He’s got a bouquet of flowers in one hand, the banner saying Happy Anniversary, and a brown paper bag in the other.

You nod to him, and he offers you a cupcake.


Tags:

#storytime

Anonymous asked: in my experience dark chocolate is solely for vegans and lactose intolerant people who are all secretly jealous of people who eat milk chocolate which is 1000000x better

{{previous post in sequence}}


answersfromvanaheim:

Well, it’s not really their fault if they can’t eat it due to intolerance.

Milk chocolate is exponentially better though.

 

tsreckoah:

Ngl I got into dark chocolate for the caffiene

 

satsekhem:

MILK CHOCOLATE OR DEEEEEEEEEEEATH

 

hyacinth-halcyon:

Milk chocolate is an affront against nature. Especially Hershey’s Milk Chocolate.

 

lizardywizard:

OH GOD hershey’s okay. hershey’s is not chocolate. hershey’s is wax and plastic scrapings solidified into a chocolate coloured bar. I am from England and the first time I tasted a Reese’s peanut butter cup my mouth caved in on itself and refused to open again for two days, so offended was it.

(slight exaggeration)

As an Official Brit I can tell you that 99% of American chocolate is Some Bullshit and you are Being Swingdled by the candy police, who want you to remain miserable all of your days. but there is hope! and light in this chocolateless wasteland!

which is to say HAVE YOU EVER TASTED BRITISH CHOCOLATE cause if you havent my frand im gonna deliver some a that shit DIRECT TO YOUR DOOR so that your mouth can experience the joy of EXPLODING OFF YOUR FACE like you’re in some old spice commercial. i’m on an iron horse.

and if you have then consider me duly corrected but i might deliver it anyway

 

brin-bellway:

My Girl Scout troop did a taste test when I was a kid: we took American Cadbury Dairy Milk bars and British Cadbury Dairy Milk bars and compared them. The more people go on about how superior British chocolate is (including all the other girls in my troop), the more I wonder if I got two American bars by mistake, because they were fucking identical.

(I would say “and I have a very good sense of taste, too”, but said good sense of taste needs a few months of training on a subject to fully kick in. If I eat a given processed food (yogurt, peanut butter granola bars, etc.) regularly, after a while I start tasting the batch variation, but I generally can’t do that right away.)

(The worst part is when you start developing opinions on which batches are better than others, or sometimes (for extra “fun”) which batches are good at all. Because grocery shopping totally needed more complexity and tradeoffs.)

Anyway, regarding milk vs dark, it really depends on what you’re used to. Dark chocolate seems too bitter if you’re used to milk, but if you keep at it (maybe in stages, using chocolates with intermediate cocoa concentrations), you get used to it and milk chocolate starts seeming too sweet.

 

lizardywizard:

To be fair, Dairy Milk is one of the less discernable ones because they actually try to make the American version taste like the British version. (I find American Dairy Milk edible.) I would try with say a Twix bar if you like those.

But they are indeed objectively different recipes! So it’s possible you did get the wrong ones by mistake.

(And yes I do the batch thing too sometimes!)

Like I said, everyone else could tell the difference. Mind you, I don’t think that one was a blind test, so who knows how much of it was power of suggestion. (The test we did a few years later, comparing a few different brands of bottled water and tap water, was blind. Everyone else thought the tap water we’d been raised on was best; I ranked it a close second behind the expensive-even-by-bottled-water-standards water. A bit awkward, that.)

Twix don’t have very much chocolate involved, do they? It’s a thin coating over the cookie and caramel. They’re okay, but I don’t actively seek them out. I note that the article you linked uses Kit Kats as one of the examples of differences, and I do sometimes seek out Kit Kats. (Snickers are my favourite, though.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #food #chocolate #home of the brave

Anonymous asked: in my experience dark chocolate is solely for vegans and lactose intolerant people who are all secretly jealous of people who eat milk chocolate which is 1000000x better

answersfromvanaheim:

Well, it’s not really their fault if they can’t eat it due to intolerance.

Milk chocolate is exponentially better though.

 

tsreckoah:

Ngl I got into dark chocolate for the caffiene

 

satsekhem:

MILK CHOCOLATE OR DEEEEEEEEEEEATH

 

hyacinth-halcyon:

Milk chocolate is an affront against nature. Especially Hershey’s Milk Chocolate.

 

lizardywizard:

OH GOD hershey’s okay. hershey’s is not chocolate. hershey’s is wax and plastic scrapings solidified into a chocolate coloured bar. I am from England and the first time I tasted a Reese’s peanut butter cup my mouth caved in on itself and refused to open again for two days, so offended was it.

(slight exaggeration)

As an Official Brit I can tell you that 99% of American chocolate is Some Bullshit and you are Being Swingdled by the candy police, who want you to remain miserable all of your days. but there is hope! and light in this chocolateless wasteland!

which is to say HAVE YOU EVER TASTED BRITISH CHOCOLATE cause if you havent my frand im gonna deliver some a that shit DIRECT TO YOUR DOOR so that your mouth can experience the joy of EXPLODING OFF YOUR FACE like you’re in some old spice commercial. i’m on an iron horse.

and if you have then consider me duly corrected but i might deliver it anyway

My Girl Scout troop did a taste test when I was a kid: we took American Cadbury Dairy Milk bars and British Cadbury Dairy Milk bars and compared them. The more people go on about how superior British chocolate is (including all the other girls in my troop), the more I wonder if I got two American bars by mistake, because they were fucking identical.

(I would say “and I have a very good sense of taste, too”, but said good sense of taste needs a few months of training on a subject to fully kick in. If I eat a given processed food (yogurt, peanut butter granola bars, etc.) regularly, after a while I start tasting the batch variation, but I generally can’t do that right away.)

(The worst part is when you start developing opinions on which batches are better than others, or sometimes (for extra “fun”) which batches are good at all. Because grocery shopping totally needed more complexity and tradeoffs.)

Anyway, regarding milk vs dark, it really depends on what you’re used to. Dark chocolate seems too bitter if you’re used to milk, but if you keep at it (maybe in stages, using chocolates with intermediate cocoa concentrations), you get used to it and milk chocolate starts seeming too sweet.


Tags:

#reply via reblog #food #chocolate #home of the brave


{{next post in sequence}}

lizardywizard:

responsible-reanimation:

Does anyone else have, like, a detached anthropological interest in blogs full of very niche erotica that has no appeal for you?

Seeing what the most vital components are, seeing how it’s cross-pollinated with other fetishes, Discourse about it- it’s all such a blast.

I thought I was the only one!

I love reading about niche fetishes and kinks and sexual orientations. I’m fascinated by looners, sneeze fetishists, bug-chaser fantasies, even things that I personally find unpleasant like emetophilia, because I love seeing how the minds of other people work.

And especially the Discourse. I love the Discourse.

Oddly enough, even as a religious person myself, I enjoy examining cults and niche religions in a very similar way.

I don’t think “detached” is quite the right word in my case, but yeah. It’s fascinating, and getting a glimpse of that vast diversity often makes me feel better about things.

(What are looners? “Sneeze fetish” and “emetophilia” are both self-explanatory (and I’ve heard of them before anyway), “bugchasing” refers to STD fetishists if I recall correctly, but I don’t think I’ve encountered the term “looner” before.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #sexuality and lack thereof #(<– you might find some interesting anthropological material in that kink tag) #the wondrous variety of sapient life

mathprofessorquotes:

Now, are you ready for me to blow your mind? Imagine a circle with a radius r = infinity. How big is that circle? See, you all are lucky that you are alive in Oregon in 2016 where the stuff you need to help you contemplate these things is completely legal and widely available.

Calculus Professor explaining why saying the radius of convergence is R=infinity makes no sense

Tags:

#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #drugs cw

{{previous post in sequence}}


{{I’m deliberately leaving the line-breaks weird because they were weird in the original, and in a way that helps get the post’s point across.}}


sdhs-rationalist:

brin-bellway:

Okay, what the fuck is going on? I can’t edit my posts, I *can’t make new
posts*, I *can’t reblog posts*. Nothing happens when I press any of those
buttons. If I press reblog while on the post’s permalink page, it takes me
to a “reblogging” page, but the draft of the reblog doesn’t appear: all I
can see is my dashboard, which is supposed to just be in the background.
Oh, and clicking the “account” button on the top bar doesn’t do anything
either.

Liking posts still works. This clearly isn’t happening to *everyone*,
because @sdhs-rationalist has made multiple reblogs since this started
happening to me. (I noticed it maybe half an hour ago, but it’s possible
it’s been happening all day and I just didn’t try to do anything that would
set it off until recently.)

I’m going to try using the post-by-email function. Let’s see what happens.

(It said I can add tags by writing hashtags at the bottom of the post, so
I’ll give that a shot.)

Hmmmm…maybe log into a new account?  

…and the reblog button appears to have magically started functioning again, sometime in the past couple of minutes. Let me go see if I can do the editing I wanted.

Yep, it works. It seems the lockout has ended as it began: for no apparent fucking reason.


Tags:

#oh look an update #The Great Tumblr Apocalypse


{{next post in sequence}}

{{I’m deliberately leaving the line-breaks weird because they were weird in the original, and in a way that helps get the post’s point across.}}


Okay, what the fuck is going on? I can’t edit my posts, I *can’t make new
posts*, I *can’t reblog posts*. Nothing happens when I press any of those
buttons. If I press reblog while on the post’s permalink page, it takes me
to a “reblogging” page, but the draft of the reblog doesn’t appear: all I
can see is my dashboard, which is supposed to just be in the background.
Oh, and clicking the “account” button on the top bar doesn’t do anything
either.

Liking posts still works. This clearly isn’t happening to *everyone*,
because @sdhs-rationalist has made multiple reblogs since this started
happening to me. (I noticed it maybe half an hour ago, but it’s possible
it’s been happening all day and I just didn’t try to do anything that would
set it off until recently.)

I’m going to try using the post-by-email function. Let’s see what happens.

(It said I can add tags by writing hashtags at the bottom of the post, so
I’ll give that a shot.)


Tags:

#oh look an original post #The Great Tumblr Apocalypse #oh god what do I do


{{next post in sequence}}