nuclearspaceheater:

stumpyjoepete:

stumpyjoepete:

Thinking about getting an air purifier. Given that half of my followers are huge nerds living in various wildfire-smoke-affected cities, it occurs to me that you might have opinions on this topic.

What should I get?

Come on, surely one of you owns one of these. Save me the work of reading a bunch of reviews online.

Build a cube of MIRV 13+ filters and a box fan. Much cheaper than a freestanding air purifier.

Alternatively, if (like me) you live somewhere where high-grade furnace filters are very expensive, go to IKEA and get some air purifiers from them.

The Förnuftig has a carbon filter and is wall-mountable, but (at least in Canada) you have to go to an IKEA store in person to get one and it’s over an hour’s drive away, so instead I got some Uppåtvinds which they’ll ship to you. They’re 50 CAD upfront and they take $6.50/year in electricity (at a weighted-average time-of-use cost of 9.27 cents per kWh) and $10/year in particle filters, vs my previous air purifier’s maintenance costs of $41.41 and ~$35 respectively. (Sure, the old one had a higher CADR, but only 23% higher: I could buy *two* of the smaller IKEA ones and still come out ahead on cost fairly quickly.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #proud citizen of The Future #recs #domesticity

Anonymous asked: rot13ed due to mentioning n s f w topics. not sure if you’re comfortable receiving this kind of ask, ignore it if it bothers you. “cbea vf n purnc xabpxbss irefvba bs fbzrguvat ryfr” bxnl Ze. oenva travhf cyrnfr gryy zr jurer v pna svaq gur erny yvsr crbcyr orvat vasyngrq yvxr n onyybba (naq abg orvat unezrq orlbaq zvyq rzoneenffzrag va gur cebprff)? orpnhfr v jbhyq irel zhpu yvxr gb svaq guvf. lbh unir ab vqrn ubj zhpu v jbhyq yvxr gb svaq guvf. (npghnyyl, lbh’ir orra ba gur vagrearg zbfg bs lbhe yvsr. lbh cebonoyl unir n cerggl tbbq vqrn bs ubj zhpu v’q yvxr gb svaq guvf.)

{{Translation of ask:

“porn is a cheap knockoff version of something else” okay Mr. brain genius please tell me where i can find the real life people being inflated like a balloon (and not being harmed beyond mild embarrassment in the process)? because i would very much like to find this. you have no idea how much i would like to find this. (actually, you’ve been on the internet most of your life. you probably have a pretty good idea of how much i’d like to find this.)}}

eightyonekilograms:

oligetcetera-deactivated2023072:

On the contrary, this is a delightfully unique ask! Thanks, even if I can’t give a satisfying answer. But since you did:

Nyevtug, fb svefg, V jnag gb gunax lbh orpnhfr guvf jnf n ernyvgl purpx ntnvafg zl fhccbfvgvbaf. Gur fgngrzrag nf V bevtvanyyl znqr vg qbrfa’g fgnaq hc gb zhpu fpehgval; abg whfg va pnfrf yvxr lbhef ohg va rira gur zbfg znvafgernz gnfgr. Snagnfvrf nera’g ernyvgl be rira n cbbe irefvba bs ernyvgl, naq gurer ner cyragl bs pnfrf jurer gurl’er npgviryl orggre; pregnvayl gur onqarff qbrfa’g sybj bire: vg jbhyq or na hahfhny zbanzbebhf crefba jub qvqa’g fbzrgvzrf snagnfvmr nobhg bgure crbcyr, rira gubhtu purngvat vf jebat; gur oybbqyhfg vaqhytrq va fubbgref be zrtnybznavn va fgengrtl tnzrf jbhyq or qnatrebhf va nabgure pbagrkg ohg svar va vg, naq fb ba. V jba’g fnl vg arire pneevrf bire nf na veba cevapvcyr ohg pregnvayl V jbhyqa’g ybbx ng na vasyngvba srgvfu nfxnapr va gur fnzr jnl V zvtug fbzrbar jvgu rynobengr snagnfvrf bs gbeghevat fgenatref gb qrngu, rira gubhtu npghnyyl vasyngvat fbzrbar jbhyq or onq, nf lbh abgr. V yvxr tevzqnex ECTf naq gurl’er gurve bja tbbq guvat naq abg n cnyr ersyrpgvba bs npghny tevz qnexarff, juvpu vf onq.

Jung V guvax V jbhyq fgvyy fgnaq ol vf gung V guvax cbeabtencul, ng gur irel yrnfg va gur zbqny pnfr, vf n fhcrefgvzhyhf va n jnl V frr xvaq bs rirelguvat geraqvat gbjneqf. Cbeabtencul vf cebonoyl yrff qnatrebhf guna zbfg bgure fhcrefgvzhyv bs guvf fbeg orpnhfr hayrff lbh tb bss gur qrrc raq lbh’er abg fcraqvat sberire ba vg, nygubhtu V guvax gurer’f na vapragvir tenqvrag gbjneqf gung. Jura zl qnq pnzr bire ur jbhyq whfg ynl ba gur pbhpu naq jngpu Snvy Nezl ivqrbf sbe ubhef; boivbhfyl gurer’f n ovttre vffhr gurer jvgu yvxr jbexcynpr rkunhfgvba (qhqr arrqf gb ergver) ohg vg frrzf jbefr.

Be gb chg vg zber pbapergryl naq yvzvgvat guvatf gb zl bja pnfr, V guvax zl bja fgvzhyhf (une) gb dhvg cbea pbyq ghexrl jnf yvxr qvfpbirevat ba erqqvg gurfr yvxr cebterffviryl zber naq zber rssvpvrag qryvirel zrpunavfzf, sebz nzvanxrq bs zl lbhgu juvpu jbhyq pbyyngr cvpf sebz bgure fvgrf ba gb gur ghor fvgrf naq erqqvgc naq erqqvgyvfg sbe qvfpbirel hagvy gurer jnf whfg bar jurer vg znpuvar yrneavatrq jung lbh hcibgrq naq fubjrq lbh zber naq zber bs gung, naq V qrpvqrq, “shpx, V’ir nyjnlf orra onq ng frys-pbageby, V’z ab zngpu sbe guvf.” V qba’g yvxr gur zrqvpnyvmvat ynathntr bs “nqqvpgvba” ohg gurer vf qrsvavgryl n curabzrabybtl bs “uhu V jvfu V unqa’g qbar fb zhpu bs gung, ubj pna V znxr zlfrys srry orggre nobhg vg bu k” juvpu V fgvyy srry nobhg n ybg bs guvatf bxnl zbfgyl fbpvny zrqvn jvgu yvxrf. (Urapr jul V ervapneangr urer fb bsgra. Juvpu V guvax unf npghnyyl jbexrq bhg cerggl jryy – vs V unq orra fgrnqvyl npphzhyngvat sbyybjref urer sbe n qrpnqr V guvax gung yriry bs rkcbfher jbhyq or onq.)

(Naljnl n pbhcyr lrnef yngre naq gur fpnel cbea qryvirel zrpunavfz vf abj gur rknpg zbqry lbhat crbcyr hfr gb qvfpbire nyy zrqvn, yby! Ubcr gung tbrf jryy.)

Xrrcvat hc jvgu guvf fjrnevat bss bs cbea unf orra gbhtu guvf cnfg unys lrne jurer zl cnegare nera’g dhvgr nf zngpurq va yvovqb nf jr hfrq gb or, ohg gubfr guvatf syhpghngr naq gou gur vqrn bs n “fgernx” pna or vgf bja tnzvsvrq zbgvingvba, naq fbzrgvzrf jura V’z gelvat gb tvir zlfrys n crc gnyx gung V’z zber pncnoyr guna V tvir zlfrys perqvg sbe gung’f jung V’yy pvgr, ba zl bja sbe-vagreany-hfr erfhzr.

Naljnl lbh jrer cebonoyl ubcvat sbe fbzr VEY vasyngvba gvcf juvpu V’z abg dhnyvsvrq gb tvir. (V pbhyq nfx PungTCG, ohg fb pbhyq lbh, naq V qrsvavgryl jbhyqa’g jnag gb fnl nalguvat nobhg gur zrqvpny nqivfnovyvgl bs nalguvat vg fhttrfgrq! Shaal bar gb vzntvar hfvat gur tenaqzn rkcybvg ba gubhtu yby.) Ohg znlor zl sbyybjref pna uryc – nal gnxref?

{{Translation of response:

Alright, so first, I want to thank you because this was a reality check against my suppositions. The statement as I originally made it doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny; not just in cases like yours but in even the most mainstream taste. Fantasies aren’t reality or even a poor version of reality, and there are plenty of cases where they’re actively better; certainly the badness doesn’t flow over: it would be an unusual monamorous person who didn’t sometimes fantasize about other people, even though cheating is wrong; the bloodlust indulged in shooters or megalomania in strategy games would be dangerous in another context but fine in it, and so on. I won’t say it never carries over as an iron principle but certainly I wouldn’t look at an inflation fetish askance in the same way I might someone with elaborate fantasies of torturing strangers to death, even though actually inflating someone would be bad, as you note. I like grimdark RPGs and they’re their own good thing and not a pale reflection of actual grim darkness, which is bad.

What I think I would still stand by is that I think pornography, at the very least in the modal case, is a superstimulus in a way I see kind of everything trending towards. Pornography is probably less dangerous than most other superstimuli of this sort because unless you go off the deep end you’re not spending forever on it, although I think there’s an incentive gradient towards that. When my dad came over he would just lay on the couch and watch Fail Army videos for hours; obviously there’s a bigger issue there with like workplace exhaustion (dude needs to retire) but it seems worse.

Or to put it more concretely and limiting things to my own case, I think my own stimulus (har) to quit porn cold turkey was like discovering on reddit these like progressively more and more efficient delivery mechanisms, from aminaked of my youth which would collate pics from other sites on to the tube sites and redditp and redditlist for discovery until there was just one where it machine learninged what you upvoted and showed you more and more of that, and I decided, “fuck, I’ve always been bad at self-control, I’m no match for this.” I don’t like the medicalizing language of “addiction” but there is definitely a phenomenology of “huh I wish I hadn’t done so much of that, how can I make myself feel better about it oh x” which I still feel about a lot of things okay mostly social media with likes. (Hence why I reincarnate here so often. Which I think has actually worked out pretty well – if I had been steadily accumulating followers here for a decade I think that level of exposure would be bad.)

(Anyway a couple years later and the scary porn delivery mechanism is now the exact model young people use to discover all media, lol! Hope that goes well.)

Keeping up with this swearing off of porn has been tough this past half year where my partner aren’t quite as matched in libido as we used to be, but those things fluctuate and tbh the idea of a “streak” can be its own gamified motivation, and sometimes when I’m trying to give myself a pep talk that I’m more capable than I give myself credit for that’s what I’ll cite, on my own for-internal-use resume.

Anyway you were probably hoping for some IRL inflation tips which I’m not qualified to give. (I could ask ChatGPT, but so could you, and I definitely wouldn’t want to say anything about the medical advisability of anything it suggested! Funny one to imagine using the grandma exploit on though lol.) But maybe my followers can help – any takers?}}

I do think the one defensible motivation for regulating porn (beyond the obvious workplace safety and consent issues) is the porn-as-superstimulus hypothesis, but the issue is, as you note, it’s no more a superstimulus than, like, most of the consumer entertainment economy these days, so for consistency’s sake you’d have to crack down on most everything. And maybe that’s a bullet people are willing to bite, but what doesn’t make sense is singling out porn as a unique category of evil.

I will say that the expansion of gambling (esp. sports gambling and mobile gacha) recently has been much more of a mess than I possibly-naively assumed it would be, and I have moved in the direction of being more willing to take a hard line against superstimuli than I was a couple years ago. But with pornography I don’t see any plausible regulation mechanism that doesn’t burn down a bunch of licit creative expression, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

I wrote this in tag register but it turned out *way* too long to fit in the tags, so here we go:

#I’ve been thinking about this kind of thing lately

#how in a lot of ways I’ve so far gotten off lightly

#(…so to speak)

#by‚ like‚ running the brain equivalent of Solaris

#approximately nobody bothers to write malware specifically targeted at me

#occasionally I encounter stuff broad-spectrum enough to hit me

#–I generally have to avoid letting potato chips into the house–

#but there’s so much that just whooshes right by

#(also…a while back a mobile-game company attempted to bribe me to try their freemium casino)

#(I did try it‚ because I could really do with the bribe money and I knew I could refrain from microtransactions)

#(and wow it is *incredibly* fucking disturbing just how optimised for addictiveness that fucking thing is)

#(like‚ I could feel myself having a memetic immune response to it)

#(“playing” that “game” was miserable‚ in the way that a fever is miserable)

#((let’s see who burns first, motherfucker))

#(on day 2 I bailed on the agreement)

#(they’d offered me sixty honest-to-God actual Canadian dollars)

#(–bear in mind that for sufficiently easy work‚ the wage at which I am ambivalent about whether to take a gig is about $1.50 an hour–)

#(and *that was not enough to be worth further exposure to that Hell*)

#((I am torn on whether to read Addiction by Design or whether it would just fill me with despair))

#“we’ll increasingly be defined by what we say no to‚” I recently read in a post from 2010

#( http://www.paulgraham.com/addiction.html )

#((“the last thing I want is for the Internet to follow me out into the world‚” he also said‚ on why he didn’t own a smartphone))

#((which on the one hand sure is a thing I have heard a lot of horror stories about))

#((and on the other hand smartphones are not in fact a package deal))

#((months after I wrote it‚ I still occasionally have people come up to me and thank me for my post on offline-first smartphone setups))

#(((we had a lovely chat about Graphene)))

#anyway‚ as I was saying a few months ago

#as the process of optimisation becomes increasingly automated‚ it becomes possible to efficiently target smaller and smaller niches

#I live in a world in which the main limiting factor on how many works of pornography I can read is how many *exist*

#and in which the process of exploration is inherently aversive because statistically almost all attempts dredge up only bad works

#and all but one attempt‚ ever‚ has dredged up at most okay works

#a machine-learning upvote algorithm simply wouldn’t have enough to work with

#it’s a very different world from the one Oligo lives in

#I’m not adapted to his world

#(I mean nobody really is‚ that’s the point‚ but me less than most)

#kind of scared of the prospect of joining him there

#(I suppose I do have the advantage of an estrogen-dominant hormonal profile)

#((I’m ovulating as I write this and I have been feeling so much pity for people who are *stuck* being fertile *all of the time*‚ holy shit))

#(…but pornography‚ the actual well-done stuff‚ *itself* heightens the libido)

#(like for *days* afterward)

#(I really did not expect how affecting it would be on that front)

#((although I guess maybe I should have; maybe it’s not actually so different from general lingering effects of fiction?))

#((…mind you‚ there were a bunch of complaints when access to novels first became widespread that boiled down to “they’re superstimuli’‘‚ weren’t there))

#(like on the one hand it’s good‚ if I *want* a higher libido‚ to have options less invasive and with fewer side effects than sleep deprivation)

#(but it was also a little unnerving and seems like it might have the potential for a vicious cycle)

#((…although in fairness it turns out that the feeling of looking at a notification email for a new porn chapter is *very different* from the feeling of looking at a bag of potato chips in my cupboard))

#((something to look forward to for later‚ rather than something tempting in the moment))

#((so that seems hopeful))


Tags:

#reply via reblog #tag rambles #sexuality and lack thereof #people who can distinguish between their drive for sleep and drive for sex fascinate me #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #disappointed permanent resident of The Future #nsfw text #drugs cw? #gambling


{{next post in sequence}}

{{previous post in sequence}}


riseofthecommonwoodpile:

smartphone storage plateauing in favor of just storing everything in the cloud is such dogshit. i should be able to have like a fucking terabyte of data on my phone at this point. i hate the fucking cloud

riseofthecommonwoodpile:

this is gonna make me sound very Old Man Yells At Cloud but i just hate how many things in my life assume i will always have access to a quick, reliable internet connection and almost cease to function without it. Obviously certain things Have To Have An Internet Connection, but i want to be able to listen to music if my service is bad. i want to still watch movies if Netflix is down. i want to have a working map when i can’t get a cell signal. nearly every tech product these days bears the fingerprint of the extremely internet-rich places they are developed, high rent offices in Seattle, San Francisco, etc.. I think often the idea of the internet not being available is so remote to them it doesn’t even factor in to development. i remember when the Xbox One was debuted and Microsoft was almost mockingly like “if you don’t have reliable fast internet, then don’t bother buying this”, and there was such backlash they completely went back on so much of that. But now that attitude is just the tech norm.

heroofthreefaces:

I don’t trust the cloud.

This makes me happy I don’t use my phone for going online

maryellencarter:

i mean you can get a terabyte phone but it costs like $1600 USD (give or take a couple hundred, idk, i’m not looking it up)

what really pisses me off is that the samsung flagship phones have completely phased out their sd card slots. you can’t get a cell phone with expandable storage anymore

brin-bellway:

Yeah, it’s such bullshit that it’s a whole ordeal to dig up a model with a microSD slot now.

I *do* have a 2020-model phone (a slightly different model of which is still in production) with a half-terabyte microSD† in it. (For CAD$155 instead of CAD$70 I could have gotten a full terabyte of microSD, but I didn’t have the budget. Mind you, I *could* upgrade later, without having to replace the whole phone…) But that’s because a microSD slot was my single highest priority when deciding what model to buy, absolutely non-negotiable: if I’d cared any less, I’d probably have ended up with a Pixel or a OnePlus.

Hmm, I wrote an extremely outdated guide to orienting your phone setup around not having reliable Internet access in 2015, and a substantially outdated guide in 2018, so it sounds like I’m due for another one. Be right back.

[three months of on-and-off tinkering later]

Okay, here’s “Tips on Offline-First Smartphones, 2023 Edition”.

†Some of the specs for that phone model you’ll see around will say it takes “up to 128 GB”, but don’t be fooled: 64 GB – 2 TB microSDs are the same backwards-compatibility tier. If a phone can take 32 GB, it might not be able to take 64, but if it can take 64 it can take 2048.

necarion:

I am told it legitimately (to a small degree) helps with waterproofing. Because a very small number of users like to swap out the SD cards regularly, like for photos and stuff for easier transfer. And some number of them are bad at it and tend to break the waterproofing around the card slot, which makes the phone less safe if dunked.

Now, this seems (a) true, and (b) like total bullshit. I don’t think I’ve ever met a person who talks about regularly swapping SD cards. And the ones who are doing it for semi pro photography stuff are generally going to be types who are more careful (or use, like, real cameras).

Right now you can get a 1TB SanDisk SD card (a better brand) for $100 USD. I’m sure the memory isn’t quite as fast as whatever is integrated into the phone. But also, 1TB can easily be fitted into that footprint. I’ve also seen chromebooks recently sporting 64GB, which is absolutely unacceptable and clearly them trying to offload like 5 year old stock. And honestly, that is part of it – the lower end processors or memory are outdated stock they are trying to get rid of. But also, since the base model seems to have been stuck at 128 for about 3 years, they are obviously still *making* the 128 for phones.

There is that point that upgrading storage (128gb to 256 gb for $100) does subsidize the lower models of phone. But also, this could easily be done for 512 to 1024GB for a $150 markup for similar profit margin (the cost to upgrade 128 to 256 sd card is about $10, from 256 to 512 is $25, and 512 to 1024 is $50.

(sorry about the additional delay: it’s been a weird couple of months)

The waterproofing complaint has the same vibe to me as, like, when people complain about the Internet connection being slow on an airplane, or that their laptop battery only lasts for five hours. All this time I have been taking for granted that these aren’t things it’s feasible to do (except *maybe* for the ultra-rich?), and the way I find out that things have changed is by overhearing people complain about the exceptions where things *do* still work the way I thought they did.

I just double-checked and indeed my phone model is not waterproof, exactly as I had unconsciously assumed of a delicate bundle of electronics with replaceable internal components.

(also there was a while there where I was having some file-sync issues and *was* regularly pulling my microSD card so that I could plug it into my laptop and sync it through there, but I’ve sorted that out now)

And yeah, I don’t feel like I have a good grasp of the reasons for what’s going on with internal storage.


Tags:

#101 Uses for Infrastructureless Computers #Brin owns *two* 2010’s computers now #reply via reblog #adventures in human capitalism #disappointed permanent resident of The Future


{{next post in sequence}}

sigmaleph:

latest bout of ‘are people much better than me at this or just way overconfident about it’: how do you even know how long it takes you to fall sleep. like. basically by definition you’re not paying attention by the time it happens, it seems like it should be really hard to have anything like an accurate measure of it. sure you can tell the difference between an hour and a minute but i see people reporting numbers with granularity in the minutes and i have no idea how they could possibly know. unless they had a sleep test i guess, someone else doing the measuring for them, but then why would you ask other people and expect that same granularity? surely the default answer is ‘i don’t know’.

there’s the whole paradoxical insomnia thing, people who report they haven’t slept at all or slept very little but have in fact slept, which i think is evidence for ‘they are just overconfident’. people can say ‘i barely slept’ when they had several hours of sleep, because the borders of sleep and wakefulness are inherently fuzzy from the inside.

Fitness-tracker wristbands? Those alarm-clock apps that decide when (within a given window) to wake you based on how much you’re moving around and therefore how lightly you’re asleep?

(not to say that there isn’t *also* a lot of overconfidence going on, but very basic sleep tests are a lot more practical than they used to be)


Tags:

#I don’t *super* trust Sleep Cycle’s graph of what times I was asleep #I *know* I’ve seen it fail to recognise times that I woke up in the middle of the night #but there’s something to be said for it and I wouldn’t be surprised if‚ like‚ some mattresses work better for it than others #reply via reblog #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #amnesia cw?

nuclearspaceheater:

hjartasalt:

hjartasalt:

0038183751f7d970f103e73fbed785a12dad1ca9
a4dafdcfc73f48ee779118a8df0fd31f4e5ac320

Too tired to draw but I still need everyone to be aware of this bizarre interaction I had at work this morning

405c24b9925e6557ac930d321d461fd2a1d755ab

Worth mentioning is that I’m in Iceland and the store I work at only accepts icelandic króna so like even euros wouldn’t have worked in this case

It occurs to me now that since cash registers are full Internet connected computers these days, surely they could be programmed to accept any currency and calculate appropriate change, with an exchange spread and an owner-configured Annoying Foreigner Surcharge.

Our full-Internet-connected-computer cash register *has* a foreign-exchange button, but (for some reason I am not privy to) it’s turned off. Our store policy is that we take U.S. cash at parity (with Canadian): if you want to pay a 35% Annoying Foreigner Surcharge, be our guest.

(Though I acknowledge that it makes a lot more sense to have a pre-existing policy on how to handle U.S. cash in Canada than it does in Iceland.)

(I think I had a guy hand me a USD$10 bill *once* in the several years I’ve worked here, and he was very apologetic about it and asked permission before ordering. Mostly it’s just a matter of not bothering to point it out when someone accidentally hands you an American nickel instead of a Canadian nickel.

We’re not *supposed* to accept when people accidentally give us British nickels or Jamaican dimes or something, but often cashiers don’t notice. Sometimes I’ll trade the cash register for it out of my own wallet so I can bring it home and go “hey guys, check out this neat coin we found!”.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #in which Brin has a job #adventures in human capitalism #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what #discourse cw? #embarrassment squick?

etirabys:

roughentumble:

unpretty:

unprettyextra:

so many posts on so many different forums are about to break

just like photobucket

Dumb question: is archive.org the kind of entity that can undo much of this damage? Can they try to scrape and store the most accessed N% of content that’s flagged as probable-to-go-down? If not, what’s stopping them – laws, resource bottlenecks, or technical difficulties?

ArchiveTeam (a distinct entity from the Internet Archive, but works closely with them) has now spun up a project to scrape Imgur for ingestion into the Wayback Machine. They welcome help; the level of tech-savviness required is “knows how to run a provided VirtualBox file”.

(VirtualBox scraper instances currently default to scraping Enjin, but if you want to specifically do Imgur you can go to 127.0.0.1:8001 while the scraper is running and change the available-projects setting.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #PSA #101 Uses for Infrastructureless Computers #amnesia cw?

maryellencarter:

heroofthreefaces:

riseofthecommonwoodpile:

riseofthecommonwoodpile:

smartphone storage plateauing in favor of just storing everything in the cloud is such dogshit. i should be able to have like a fucking terabyte of data on my phone at this point. i hate the fucking cloud

this is gonna make me sound very Old Man Yells At Cloud but i just hate how many things in my life assume i will always have access to a quick, reliable internet connection and almost cease to function without it. Obviously certain things Have To Have An Internet Connection, but i want to be able to listen to music if my service is bad. i want to still watch movies if Netflix is down. i want to have a working map when i can’t get a cell signal. nearly every tech product these days bears the fingerprint of the extremely internet-rich places they are developed, high rent offices in Seattle, San Francisco, etc.. I think often the idea of the internet not being available is so remote to them it doesn’t even factor in to development. i remember when the Xbox One was debuted and Microsoft was almost mockingly like “if you don’t have reliable fast internet, then don’t bother buying this”, and there was such backlash they completely went back on so much of that. But now that attitude is just the tech norm.

I don’t trust the cloud.

This makes me happy I don’t use my phone for going online

i mean you can get a terabyte phone but it costs like $1600 USD (give or take a couple hundred, idk, i’m not looking it up)

what really pisses me off is that the samsung flagship phones have completely phased out their sd card slots. you can’t get a cell phone with expandable storage anymore

Yeah, it’s such bullshit that it’s a whole ordeal to dig up a model with a microSD slot now.

I *do* have a 2020-model phone (a slightly different model of which is still in production) with a half-terabyte microSD† in it. (For CAD$155 instead of CAD$70 I could have gotten a full terabyte of microSD, but I didn’t have the budget. Mind you, I *could* upgrade later, without having to replace the whole phone…) But that’s because a microSD slot was my single highest priority when deciding what model to buy, absolutely non-negotiable: if I’d cared any less, I’d probably have ended up with a Pixel or a OnePlus.

Hmm, I wrote an extremely outdated guide to orienting your phone setup around not having reliable Internet access in 2015, and a substantially outdated guide in 2018, so it sounds like I’m due for another one. Be right back.

[three months of on-and-off tinkering later]

Okay, here’s “Tips on Offline-First Smartphones, 2023 Edition”.

†Some of the specs for that phone model you’ll see around will say it takes “up to 128 GB”, but don’t be fooled: 64 GB – 2 TB microSDs are the same backwards-compatibility tier. If a phone can take 32 GB, it might not be able to take 64, but if it can take 64 it can take 2048.


Tags:

#reply via reblog #oh look an original post #disappointed permanent resident of The Future #Brin owns *two* 2010’s computers now #fun with loopholes #101 Uses for Infrastructureless Computers


{{next post in sequence}}

sigmaleph:

you are offered a choice:

  1. You get to open a video-game style character creation screen and customise your body at will, to anything within range of human variation (no cat ears, sorry). This includes letting you set a new biological age, get rid of any physical health issues, and so on. Your new appearance seems unremarkable to anyone who knows you, all government databases with your picture are adjusted, etc.
  2. You get 150 000 USD every year for the rest of your life without having to do anything for it. You don’t pay taxes on this money, it adjusts with inflation automatically, it appears entirely legitimate to any authorities, etc.

what do you choose, and also, are you trans or cis (if you’re tempted to answer ‘it’s complicated’, round off to trans)?

Choose:

character-creation-vs-150k-poll

My tag ramble was so long that Tumblr cut it off (apparently the current limit is 30 tags), so I’m dumping it into the main post body:

#I’ve been wavering on whether to reblog this for ages

#I felt kind of bad about piling on to Sofi’s notespam like that

#but it being context for the next post has pushed me over into “yes”

#I didn’t realise until after voting that the character creation is one-time-only rather than ongoing access

#which makes the correct answer less *obvious*

#but I stand by my vote of cis | character creation

#(as it happens I *am* considering doing a second puberty through this‚ but they’d both be estrogenic)

#(honestly I’d barely even need the magic ID updating)

#(29-year-old me in 12-year-old me’s body could pass for 29 about as well as I could in 29-year-old body)

#(the two mes look pretty much the same: it’s all a matter of how you act)

#((well‚ 12-year-old me was a little smaller‚ but within the adult range and her face was already more or less stable))

#(((ooh‚ I bet I could tweak it so that I *stay* five-foot-one this time around)))

#(((during my first puberty my body map never updated for my final growth spurt‚ and

#I’m not *dysphoric* about being two inches too tall‚ but it does get a bit disorienting sometimes)))

#anyway my point there is that…a lot of people in the notes are going “money can be exchanged for goods and services”

#but I think in this case that’s actually backwards

#while money and health do both feed into each other

#health can be exchanged for money to a much greater degree than money can be exchanged for health

#money can *maybe* buy you the *appearance* of 9 – 17

#–(depending on how much puberty I can get away with doing again without fucking up my brain)–

#more years of youth‚ but it won’t buy you the lifespan nor the functionality of it

#money can buy you the ability to *breathe* your homeworld’s atmosphere even during pollen season

#and enough of it can buy you the ability to *talk* while breathing it

#but it can’t really buy you the ability to eat and drink while breathing it‚ and that’s a significant handicap in itself

#(not to mention the street harassment you get wearing a prosthetic immune system (to keep your built-in immune system from freaking out))

#likewise‚ money can buy disease *prevention*‚ but not the ability to shrug it off once you’ve caught it

#the ability of money to buy more robust bones is extremely limited

#(have I ever broken a bone? no! but why settle for merely *adequate* bone strength when I can have *optimal* bone strength?)

#((…god‚ why is anyone who is not *actively dying* for want of resources taking the money over the health))

#((I was so very aware‚ that time last year that a ventilation floor grate broke beneath me‚ that if I’d been 80 I would have *died*))

#((but I was 28‚ and I got away without even a broken bone))

#((why would you give that up any more than you have to))

#the list goes on

#meanwhile‚ health can buy you a nice steady low-non-physical-barrier-to-entry job as a farmhand or dockworker

#(not *as* steady as magic income‚ yes‚ and I *do* care a great deal about that‚ but I care about health *more*)

#and I’m not altruistic enough to take more money than I need so that I can give the rest away‚ not given what else is on offer


Tags:

#reply via reblog #tag rambles #surveys #transhumanism #gender #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #adventures in human capitalism #aging cw #death tw #poison cw? #injury cw #illness tw?


{{next post in sequence}}

tanadrin:

An evil wizard holds you at gunpoint and requires you to choose one of the following emotions to lose forever. You will not feel the faintest trace of it ever again. Which do you pick?

evil-wizard-negative-emotion-poll

tanadrin:

Mildly surprised by the results of this poll, given that it’s a dead heat between the three for me. I suppose it shouldn’t be entirely surprising that shame wins, since it is in some ways a very social emotion, and how others perceive us (and our worries about how they perceive us) occupies a lot of our thoughts. But though I would gladly dispense with all three emotions, if I somehow could, a small sense of shame seems the most useful, since it is at least sometimes a useful key to whether others might be put off or annoyed by our actions.

jadagul:

I’m confused by the idea that this is an evil wizard. Losing shame and losing anger both seem clearly net positive to me?

kata4a:

oh wow. fear and shame both seem straightforwardly useful to me in a way that anger does not

apricops:

“What could possibly go wrong with losing my sense of shame,” I say five minutes before shitting myself in public

tanadrin:

There was a woman born with a congenital condition that prevents her feeling fear interviewed on, I think Radiolab a while back; something that struck me about the interview was that feeling no fear didn’t interfere with her life 99% of the time; it certainly didn’t make her more inclined to play in traffic as a kid or anything. Her cognitive ability to predict and avoid harm was perfectly intact. They did indicate (though did not really detail) that there were a handful of occasions in her life where a lack of being able to feel fear led her into riskier situations, but this was more akin to what a naive or trusting person might experience–if anything, someone who feels no fear would be less likely to be, say, an adrenaline junkie who takes risks because they experience a fear response in a particular way.

I think if you were cognitively normal except unable to experience shame, you probably wouldn’t shit your pants more often in public (so to speak); you would retain your ability to predict which situations might cause you to accrue negative social capital and to avoid them. I think a lot of what fear and shame (and all our other emotions do) is help us cache those calculations, or reinforce the desire to avoid behaviors, but we don’t depend on them to act like, in basically sane and rational ways. If you had no trace of shame I do expect your behavior would be at least a little different, unless it was really working hard to restrain some deeply unpopular compulsion, but I don’t think it would actively incentivize acting in weird ways.

discoursedrome:

more than anything else this poll made me feel perplexed about how different I am than others. I picked anger because it seems, like, really obviously the best choice, but it’s the least popular! Shame and fear are both defensive emotions, in the sense that they’re designed to protect you from threats, but anger is largely an offensive emotion; I’m much more concerned about compromising my defensive capabilities than my offensive ones, since society doesn’t feel like the kind of situation where you can just plow through everything with a strong preemptive assault. I think maybe the square-jawed dynastic banker guys can pull that off, which is why they do so much cocaine? But it’s not, like, usual. Having no sense of anger feels much safer than the other two.

I suppose the results are complicated by people’s individual tendencies, though, too. Someone who has way too much of a particular thing would probably be biased to get rid of it, so at least some of this might be that the reclusive tunnel-dwellers of Tumblr have more fear and shame than anger on the balance.

togglessymposium:

Anger is absolutely a useful, load-bearing element of my life. It’s motive, in a way that the others are not; it’s one of the basic things that distinguishes between the world I live in and the world as I want it to be. Reducing that better world to a mere ‘would be nice’ is… extremely disturbing to me.

So I guess I can agree that it’s ‘safer’ to get rid of anger, in that it’s not likely to result in dangerous situations for you or anybody else. But it’s also a life of extreme complacency, in a way that’s directly counter to many of my core values. Without anger, there’s no sense of unfairness; without unfairness, there’s no aspiration to justice. Most notably, I really hate death, to the point of being slightly loony about it- without that, I’m fairly sure my baseline personality would look very different.

Man, reading this thread makes me feel like one of those colourblind people wondering why people are making such a big deal about subtle variations in shades of brownish-gray.

I read through the notes, and almost *every* example that *every* person brings up for *every* emotion on this list parses as fear to me.

I’m reblogging this particular version primarily because of how surprising it is to see someone describe the-painful-awareness-of-the-gap-between-how-the-world-is-and-how-it-ought-to-be as *anger*, when as I experience it…okay, some of it is disgust† and a fair bit of it is simply pain (which is not exactly an emotion per se), but the rest is basically a *central example* of fear to me.

By the time I saw this post it was too late to vote on it, but I’d have gone with anger. I can’t say I’d be *fully* comfortable with “dealing with my inability to (safely, ethically, etc) satisfy my bloodlust†† by cutting it out of my soul”, but I have to admit it *would* be the most practical approach.

(I’m not going with shame because I absolutely do not understand what it would mean to cut out shame but leave fear intact, and I’m not fucking with that. At least there is *a* thing that it would mean to me to cut out anger while leaving the others, even if I’m not drawing that line in the same place as anyone else.)

†shitting myself in public would *also* be disgust, BTW: shitting myself in private does not seem like it would be significantly less unpleasant modulo bathroom access

††I cannot *begin* to wrap my head around what “non-violent anger” would be like as a quale, I suppose next you’re going to tell me eths can be placed at the ends of syllables


Tags:

#this also happens a lot when people are talking about sadness #reply via reblog #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #anger management #surveys #unsanitary cw #violence cw? #this probably deserves some other warning tag but I am not sure what

{{previous post in sequence}}


eightyonekilograms:

In the big list of “terms of art in a specific discipline that suddenly everybody is familiar with”, I think that to go with “coronavirus”, “core inflation”, etc. we’ll shortly be adding “cascading failure.”

sigmaleph:

tags from @brin-bellway

#I desperately want to make an “in the future‚ ‘zoonosis’ will be a word everyone knows” reference here#but I can’t think of a suitable word to stick in there#maybe if I were more fluent in webdev jargon#(…why does that quote not turn up on search engines)#(please tell me somebody knows what I’m talking about)

There’s a fancy word for this phenomenon, used by scientists who study infectious diseases from an ecological perspective: zoonosis. […] It’s a word of the future, destined for heavy use in the twenty-first century.

2014 Oct: Ebola: The Natural and Human History of a Deadly Virus, by David Quammen

I got that off Siderea’s Great Age of Plagues series, though perhaps you got it from elsewhere.

brin-bellway:

That’s getting at the same idea, yeah, but I don’t think it’s the exact line I was thinking of. (I wouldn’t be surprised if the thing I saw was a David Quammen author interview, though.)

Update:

Siderea, 2022-12-31:

On the first anniversary of my 2020 post “Preparing for the Pandemic: Stage 0”, I wrote a post “The Very Bad News”, in which I said:

[…] the public imagination about climate change has been pretty much exclusively trained to entertain meteorological calamities – storms, mostly – but there are whole other categories.

Such as the epidemiological.

See, even if *this* pandemic wasn’t caused by the Climate Catastrophe, it seems the epidemiologists are expecting the Climate Catastrophe to cause other pandemics and epidemics. There’s a variety of reasons why – I had found a prescient essay from, IIRC, 2015 or so, which I have subsequently lost, which had a sentence to the effect of, “In the future, ‘zoonosis’ is going to be a word everyone knows.” – but we can discuss those later.

Well the actual quote, it turns out, is, as I quoted above, “Zoonosis.  […] It’s a word of the future, destined for heavy use in the twenty-first century.”

It *feels* like that specific “going to be a word everyone knows” line has been around since the 2010s, but (1) that might not be accurate and (2) 2021 might not be the first time Siderea said it. (She has apparently set her blog to not be indexed by public search engines, and I don’t currently have any plans to ingest it into my personal search engine.)


Tags:

#oh look an update #reply via reblog #apocalypse cw #illness tw #amnesia cw? #climate change