absolute-immunities:

ever since I learned about the “turned comma,” the rotated comma type that typographers once used as a superscript “c,” Michael G. Collins, M‘Culloch and the Turned Comma12 Green Bag 2d 265 (2009), I can’t help but notice when people get it wrong

Justice Kagan, for example, got it wrong in Kahler v. Kansas, No. 18-6135, slip op. at 2 (U.S. March 23, 2020):

0df86f5e02c2aa2beccaa0321fe02b20c15c0ec4
5b7f1aa59997b2852399e92bd18ff24dc0fc20ec

but it’s actually M‘Naghten’s Case (1843) 10 Cl. & Fin. 200, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (HL), as the report reveals:

179bcd9baa196089956d4675d7c7228f7d9d7d9a

word processors can’t rotate type, but we could approximate the “turned comma” much better if we used a single open quotation mark (‘) instead of an apostrophe (’), as Justice Kagan does here

or we could just use “c,” as we do for McCulloch v. Maryland17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819), even though the report reads:

6119080f112bf952a9122e35cf91781bb6c3ac1c

Tags:

#language #the more you know #embarrassment squick? #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.