through-a-historic-lens:

9037cf070c21e02b263528dcbb6a10b835e59a53

Photograph of first pig to fly, 1909

The first historically recorded flight of a pig took place on at Leysdown in Kent (Great Britain) on November 4th, 1909. With this flight, the aristocratic British aviator made porcine aviation a reality. He fixed a wicker basket to a wing strut of his Voisin biplane and carefully strapped a pig into it. The basket had a hand written sign “I am the first pig to fly”. Then he took the bemused pig for a flight of about 3.7 miles from Shellbeach, the Short Brothers airfield at Leysdown on the Isle of Sheppey.


Tags:

#history #fun with loopholes #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

homunculus-argument:

If plague doctors hadn’t been a real thing, and you made them up for a speculative history/fantasy story, people would complain that they’re implausibly advanced and way too cool.

Like you’re like “yeah there’s this super lethal illness and nobody actually knows how it spreads so just to be safe they’ve got these sick gothy fucking hazmat suits. No Greg shut up they totally had all the materials to make them, you can make fabric splatter-resistant by waxing and oiling it. And the mask is because of the- guys shut up, let me finish. The mask is- there’s scented- guys shut up. They didn’t have germ theory but they figured it has something to do with the air smelling- No shut up, you’re a fucking furry. The beak makes it cool. Jerks.”


Tags:

#history #clothing #illness tw #discourse cw? #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

500 Million, But Not a Single One More

{{Title link: http://blog.jaibot.com/?p=413 }}

jaiwithanadult:

We will never know their names.

The first victim could not have been recorded, for there was no written language to record it. They were someone’s daughter, or son, and someone’s friend, and they were loved by those around them. And they were in pain, covered in rashes, confused, scared, not knowing why this was happening to them or what they could do about it – victim of a mad, inhuman god. There was nothing to be done – humanity was not strong enough, not aware enough, not knowledgeable enough, to fight back against a monster that could not be seen.

It was in Ancient Egypt, where it attacked slave and pharaoh alike. In Rome, it effortlessly decimated armies. It killed in Syria. It killed in Moscow.  In India, five million dead. It killed a thousand Europeans every day in the 18th century. It killed more than fifty million Native Americans. From the Peloponnesian War to the Civil War, it slew more soldiers and civilians than any weapon, any soldier, any army (Not that this stopped the most foolish and empty souls from attempting to harness the demon as a weapon against their enemies).

Cultures grew and faltered, and it remained. Empires rose and fell, and it thrived. Ideologies waxed and waned, but it did not care. Kill. Maim. Spread. An ancient, mad god, hidden from view, that could not be fought, could not be confronted, could not even be comprehended. Not the only one of its kind, but the most devastating.

For a long time, there was no hope – only the bitter, hollow endurance of survivors.

In China, in the 10th century, humanity began to fight back.

It was observed that survivors of the mad god’s curse would never be touched again: they had taken a portion of that power into themselves, and were so protected from it. Not only that, but this power could be shared by consuming a remnant of the wounds. There was a price, for you could not take the god’s power without first defeating it – but a smaller battle, on humanity’s terms. By the 16th century, the technique spread, to India, across Asia, the Ottoman Empire and, in the 18th century, Europe. In 1796, a more powerful technique was discovered by Edward Jenner.

An idea began to take hold: Perhaps the ancient god could be killed.

A whisper became a voice; a voice became a call; a call became a battle cry, sweeping across villages, cities, nations. Humanity began to cooperate, spreading the protective power across the globe, dispatching masters of the craft to protect whole populations. People who had once been sworn enemies joined in common cause for this one battle. Governments mandated that all citizens protect themselves, for giving the ancient enemy a single life would put millions in danger.

And, inch by inch, humanity drove its enemy back. Fewer friends wept; Fewer neighbors were crippled; Fewer parents had to bury their children.

At the dawn of the 20th century, for the first time, humanity banished the enemy from entire regions of the world. Humanity faltered many times in its efforts, but there individuals who never gave up, who fought for the dream of a world where no child or loved one would ever fear the demon ever again. Viktor Zhdanov, who called for humanity to unite in a final push against the demon; The great tactician Karel Raška, who conceived of a strategy to annihilate the enemy; Donald Henderson, who led the efforts of those final days.

The enemy grew weaker. Millions became thousands, thousands became dozens. And then, when the enemy did strike, scores of humans came forth to defy it, protecting all those whom it might endanger.

The enemy’s last attack in the wild was on Ali Maow Maalin, in 1977. For months afterwards, dedicated humans swept the surrounding area, seeking out any last, desperate hiding place where the enemy might yet remain.

They found none.

35 years ago, on December 9th, 1979, humanity declared victory.

This one evil, the horror from beyond memory, the monster that took 500 million people from this world – was destroyed.

You are a member of the species that did that. Never forget what we are capable of, when we band together and declare battle on what is broken in the world.

Happy Smallpox Eradication Day.


Tags:

#an increasingly bitter holiday as we head further into the 2020s #(also I dislike being called human) #but thank you‚ civilisation‚ for the knowledge and the tools that I needed to throw this starfish into the ocean #I still want that new orthopox vaccine though #Tumblr traditions #anniversaries #history #proud citizen of The Future #disappointed permanent resident of The Future #illness tw #transhumanism

grayghostofthenorth:

46d20a0a7320e1bf122dd1761b3e3dd7c013ce59

Borzoi White Mohair with zipper (box for pajamas), glass eyes

elodieunderglass:

It’s so weird that pyjama cases were a thing. They went so abruptly out of fashion, too. The idea was (I think) that it was vaguely indecent to leave your pajamas around, and it definitely spoils the look of your nicely made bed, so lots of people put them under the pillow; but a cuter thing to do was to have a specially made empty stuffed animal or cute purse or pillow thing, with a zipper, and you’d stuff it with your pajamas in the morning and place it cutely on your nicely made bed. Then in the evening, you would unzip and disembowel the soft plump object, and reclaim the pajamas. It wasn’t just a thing for kids; adults did it too. In the kind of pre-1950s novels I like to pick up, authors describe a character’s pyjama case to reveal a bit about the character; but of course they never say why you’d have a pyjama case. “Everyone knows what a horse is.”

I suppose it’s been culturally decided that it’s an unnecessary step in the bedtime process. We’re busy bastards, aren’t we? Who makes their bed every morning, I mean, really?

Perhaps, also, our clothing is no longer of the material and methodology where you have to spend extra time/attention/tools on them. Pyjama cases may have had some benefit – extending the life of the pyjamas, or something. Perhaps it was more common in those days for mice to climb into your silk pyjamas, or they kept them from being attacked by dogs, or something. It’s possible that there are unspoken benefits to keeping your pyjamas in a stuffed toy, which previous generations knew instinctively and we have forgotten. Some people are like that, they maintain rituals and practices that don’t get written down, and so become arcana. My father-in-law owns special clothing maintenance tools such as shoe trees (which you place in your shoes every night at night) and trouser presses (in which you leave your worn-but-not-dirty trousers overnight so they are crisp in the morning). He irons his pocket handkerchiefs – why? so that they fold into a precise pocket shape, with the same fold pattern as plastic-wrapped disposable tissues: the optimised shape for pockets. You are not going to read in the literature about there being a reason for ironing pocket handkerchiefs. It is a habit that is not captured by history. You have to speak to a practitioner to even consider that there is a specific value in pocket handkerchief folding. Maybe we operate at a remove from the people who could have told us why they bothered with the idea and then stopped.

You can buy a selection of pyjama cases online, but with no explanation of why you’d want to, it’s hard to see how this helps. The only real thing i can see is that it’s cute and tidies the pyjamas up, but we’ve all decided that untidy pyjamas are a problem that doesn’t need solving.

Pyjama cases have no Wikipedia article; search engines have nothing to offer. Old books only self-reference them being a normal thing. Someone who knows about pyjama cases or textile history could heroically fill this in. Please do. Otherwise, this tumblr post is going to suddenly become the leading analysis of pyjama cases, and that would be sad.

becausegoodheroesdeservekidneys:

Holy shit, I’d completely forgotten about pyjama cases

I had one as a kid (1990s) – it was a palomino horse, lying down but the perfect size for my doll to ride. I made a little saddle and bridle for it and kept it stuffed with newspaper to keep shape

God, the things that come back to you

maryellencarter:

I had a plushie kangaroo where the pocket was for your pajamas! Late 1980s / early 1990s


Tags:

#history #clothing #love the decor fandom #the more you know #amnesia cw #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

changeling-droneco asked: as youre very both old school fandom and also someone who works to preserve old fandom content, what do you think is the best way to print off and preserve fanfics? I’ve been wanting to start to move my many many many archived pdfs into actual physical copies but ive been way too intimidated to really look deep into it so I was wondering if you had a preference

prismatic-bell:

Okay, so.

My preference is “yes.” Yes, I want you to archive them. Yes, I want you to save them. I’ve worked to preserve 1960s teen pulp mags, for fuck’s sake, it can’t get much worse than that, and I’m grateful to have them.

With that said, pick any or all of the following options to make your physical printouts last longer:

–select acid-free paper
–bind by sewing, not stapling
–store in archival sleeves, like the ones you use for old comic books

And now, pick any or all of the following options to make my life easier as a historian (or, you know, the lives of the historians who come after me):

–include the title
–include the author’s name
–include the fandom name
–include which version of the canon, if relevant (e.g. the OG Transformers show vs the Michael Bay movies)
–include the date, or at least year, of publication
–include the summary
–include the site of origin, including the URL

All of these things are called provenance and help not only to identify a specific work, but to place it within its cultural context. As an amusing example: I recently got into James Bond, and decided to go through every fic in the main pairing tag, in chronological order. There came a point where suddenly, out of nowhere, there were like two solid pages of nothing but A/B/O, which I previously had not seen at all. I had a suspicion, so I looked it up, and sure enough–those two pages appeared within just a couple of weeks of the corresponding Supernatural episode. Having publication dates let me determine that. If I were a historian trying to piece together a long-ago puzzle instead of going “lol I live on the hellsite, I bet I know exactly where this came from,” that would be a huge datapoint. I could probably find a similar sudden explosion in other fandoms, as well–and if we’re going far enough in the future, if Supernatural were to just vanish off the face of the planet along with its entire fandom, historians could still trace that it existed and even determine some of its events based on when certain tropes begin to appear in other fandoms. And further, the fact that its tropes and major events appear in so many other fandoms would allow those historians to say “this must have been a very, very popular story.” (This isn’t just me making shit up to sound important, by the way. This is literally how we have records of a lot of things throughout antiquity and even into the Renaissance. The more copies there are of something, or the more references that are made to a thing in other things, the more likely it is for at least part of it to survive. This is literally how we know about Shakespeare’s two lost plays–he was a popular enough playwright that quartos of his plays were advertised for sale.)

Whew! Now let’s get into stuff you could do that would make me, as a historian, scream with delight if I were to open your folder full of labeled, acid-free fanfiction fifty years from now:

–write a little something about why you picked this particular fic to preserve in hard copy when doing so is bulky and time-consuming compared to the easy instant storage of the internet, yes, even if your reason is “I’m trying not to use my phone in bed because the screen keeps me awake but this story is soothing to reread”
–write a little something about who you are, even if it’s just “my name is X, my age is Y, I live in Z, I printed this out in 2022”

And last but not least:

Marginalia. Marginalia. Marginalia, my beloved. That’s when you write your thoughts in the columns on the sides, underline stuff, circle it, and so on. Having marginalia means I actually get a window into your thoughts as you read–your perspective, stuff that stuck out to you, places the story made you feel some kind of serious emotion. And yes, this goes for everything. Villain A kills Hero B and you write “YOU MOTHERFUCKER” in the margin, that tells Future Historian Me that you really loved Hero B, you were invested in seeing her succeed, and that this scene really resonated with you. One of my most treasured possessions in the fandom museum is a copy of the novelization of the Help! movie the Beatles did. This particular copy is very worn–unsurprising, it was a cheap paperback even when it was printed–but also, its original owner apparently took it to the movie theatre and

wrote notes in the margins indicating all the things happening onscreen that weren’t in the book. What does this tell me? WELL. Let’s go ahead and take a look:

1) the written ink doesn’t look any newer than the book, so I’m guessing a little when I say this was the original owner and in the theatre, but I have an actual datapoint I’m basing that on
2) based on handwriting and the main demographic of the Beatles audience at the time, this was a young woman, probably a teenager.
3) she went to see the movie more than once (some notes are in pencil, some in ink, but the handwriting is all the same)
4) she was dedicated to making sure every moment of the movie was preserved. This was an era before home video players, so once the movie left theatres, she had no guarantee of seeing it again.
5) while the book is worn, it’s not beaten all to shit. It was read a lot, but there’s no evidence it was mistreated, so it was probably a prized or at least respected possession.

What can I extrapolate from this, with the understanding that I mean “what theories can I reasonably form but not prove”? Well. She was probably a pretty big fan, since she went to see the movie at least twice and also bought the book. Maybe she wanted to keep the story after the movie was gone. Maybe she was looking for answers for some teen mag contest like “find these things in the Help! movie and win a chance to meet the Beatles.” Maybe she had a friend who wasn’t allowed to go to the movie. You know what the most tantalizing possibility is to me, although I’ll never be able to prove it and actual ethics as a historian mean I can only present it as one among many possibilities? Maybe she did it as a source reference for writing fanfiction. We don’t know. We can’t know, because I have no idea who the original owner was or if she’s even still alive and no way to trace her. But that? In terms of fandom history, that is a fucking gold mine. Pure 24-karat all through. From a strictly historical view, that’s worth more than the animation cel I’ve got in there, and I paid over a hundred bucks for that thing.

So yeah! That was a lot of words to say “just do it.” But there’s your answer!

changeling-droneco:

Oh this is super helpful I had never even HEARD of acid-free paper before this, and I had no idea how important things like dates and notes in the margins could be! Also gives me an excuse to practice sewing again for the first time in years if stapling isn’t the best idea. I still have plenty of my own research to do because I care deeply about a lot of these stories and I want to do them justice. I’m also just really glad there’s people like you who go “Who cares if its a shitty first attempt? I have worse and I love it immensely not just despite of it but in some ways because of it!” it really takes the edge of my anxiety about not being perfect.

prismatic-bell:

LAST TIME, ON “NINA BLOGS FANDOM HISTORY”:

Make me scream in glee by doing these things!

@sailorzeo can confirm she just saw me do just that, when she handed me an old book of printed fanfiction (actual quote upon her finding it: “SQUEEAK!!”). I’m looking through it right now, and when I say whatever you write, WHATEVER you write, provides provenance and context?

0776c1fa01a04f9aff3faed1ff4227343931440d

This is from 1996. Today it would almost certainly be measured in total word count. But in Ye Olde Days, you had to watch how much content you were putting per part because dial-up was slow and people wanted to read their fic when they were still young; measuring in pages or K/KB (kilobytes, not thousands) was the standard.

This is literally a look at the customs of fandom before broadband or even DSL were widespread. And it’s a single handwritten page. Look at everything there! How Zeo (and the author) chose to organize it; the length compared to modern-day fic; the way it’s segmented. (Looking at the fic itself, the formatting is also way different than modern formatting. Good, but different.)

And at least in theory, via the Wayback Machine or archive.org, I could still go find this fic online, because the name of the webpage is included on the printouts.

WRITE. YOUR. PROVENANCE.

starsdreaming:

I’m going to add a little bit that will make historians love you even more when you write the provenance down. Add the date you downloaded the fic.

When you are sourcing online information for research papers and the like, you have to put the date you found the info, because it can change on the web page. The information on the reference page is roughly

“Author, title, journal name, volume, number, year, url, date accessed” or

“Author, title, url, date accessed” for something short

prismatic-bell:

Important addition.

moreroads:

…..i have thousands of words worth of comments that Ive left on fic. many that have been replied to and that I still have access to download also……

do….do historians want that too?

@prismatic-bell

prismatic-bell:

YEP.

Just the idea thrills me. Comments are a form of marginalia! They’re sharing your thoughts, but with the author this time. The fact that we can do that so instantly is unmatched in history and it absolutely changes the way people engage with the text.


Tags:

#history #101 Uses for Infrastructureless Computers #fandom #amnesia cw? #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once #P.S. this‚ the only Backup Awareness Week post that was *already* in my queue before Backup Awareness Week hit #concludes our queue of Backup Awareness Week posts #be safe out there #(P.P.S. this afternoon‚ 2023-11-10‚ I was thinking over which fics to maybe do this with while I was washing dishes) #(this dusk I saw the post again while rearranging my queue) #(and‚ I want you to know‚ an hour later a new chapter of ”Give These People a Break” came out) #(and…yeah‚ if I end up doing this I’m doing that one first) #(it is important to know that you are not alone)

nextworldover:

mystery-moose:

Okay no for real this whole idea of Goncharov is very funny but get your fuckin’ timeline right, okay.

Martin Scorsese had made exactly two movies by 1973, he didn’t have the cachet to make a big budget or even mid budget crime movie about the Naples mafia. Certainly not the greatest mafia movie ever made! Further, he hadn’t yet developed his filmmaking style, let alone his fascination with the criminal underworld, and The Godfather had just come out the year before, so there wasn’t even time to get used to the romantic portrayal of gangsters that Scorsese’s films would act as revisionist responses to! The conversation had barely even started yet!

And then there’s the actors: Robert De Niro was a working actor then, not a huge star — he’d been in a few movies by then, including three from noted trash sommelier Brian De Palma and one from even more noted trash auteur Roger Corman — and he actually worked with Scorsese and Keitel that same year in Mean Streets! He got some acclaim for that performance but it wasn’t like, Godfather level, y’know? Not in terms of fame or notice at least. And Pacino? Pacino’s first major role was The Godfather the previous year! That was his third film ever! He did Serpico in ‘73! He hadn’t even done Dog Day Afternoon yet! And he didn’t work with Scorsese until The Irishman, which came out in 2019!

Really, y’all, what you’re imagining, the movie you’re all spinning out of thin air here, probably came out in like, 1983, not ‘73. Probably in place of Scarface or something (which for my money would be an improvement). You’ve got De Niro post-Deer Hunter and Taxi Driver, he’s worked with Scorsese before, you’ve had two excellent Godfather films to build a mythology of the romantic gangster around for Scorsese to play with. You’ve got Pacino after shit like Serpico and Cruising, he’s in his prime. You’re still pre-Goodfellas for Scorsese, so he hasn’t gone sicko mode yet, but he’s done great movies that got noticed and he’d be able to pick up a budget and a production company to go to Naples. He’s worked with big studios, he’s got some clout. Now is the time for Goncharov!

But nooo, all this happened before you were born so it’s all vague and nebulous “before-times.” What’s the difference between 1973 and 1983? Who cares? Well I do! And now you know! History matters okay!! Learn ya history!!!

df5493422a938acaa04da1db9e7678ba55162d22

i think this is my favorite reconciliation of established goncharov lore with scorsese’s actual film career


Tags:

#Goncharov #history #fun with loopholes #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

transgenderer:

check (v.1)

ate 15c., in chess, “to attack the king; to put (the opponent’s king) in check;” earlier (late 14c.) in a figurative sense, “to stop, arrest; block, barricade;” from check (n.1) or Old French eschequier, from the noun in French. A player in chess limits his opponent’s ability to move when he places his opponent’s king in check.

The other senses seem all to have developed from the chess sense, or from the noun: “To arrest, stop,” then “to hold in restraint” (1620s); “to hold up or control” (an assertion, a person, etc.) by comparison with some authority or record (1690s); of baggage, etc., “to hand over in return for a check that serves as a means of identifying” (1846); “to note with a mark as having been examined, etc., mark off from a list” (1928).

Hence, to check off (1839); to check up (1883); to check in or out (in a hotel, of a library book, etc., 1909). To check out (something) “to look at, investigate” is from 1959

check (n.1)

c. 1300, in chess, “a call noting one’s move has placed his opponent’s king (or another major piece) in immediate peril,” from Old French eschequier “a check at chess” (also “chess board, chess set”), from eschec “the game of chess; chessboard; check; checkmate,” from Vulgar Latin *scaccus, from Arabic shah, from Persian shah “king,” the principal piece in a chess game (see shah; also compare checkmate (n.)). Also c. 1300 in a generalized sense, “harmful incident or event, hostile environment.”

As “an exposure of the king to a direct attack from an opposing piece” early 15c. When his king is in check, a player’s choices are severely limited. From that notion come the many extended senses: From the notion of “a sudden stoppage, hindrance, restraint” (1510s) comes that of “act or means of checking or restraining,” also “means of detecting or exposing or preventing error; a check against forgery or alteration.”

Hence: “a counter-register as a token of ownership used to check against, and prevent, loss or theft” (as in hat check, etc.), 1812. Hence also the financial use for “written order for money drawn on a bank, money draft” (1798, often spelled cheque), which was probably influenced by exchequer. Hence also “mark put against names or items on a list indicating they have been verified or otherwise examined” (by 1856).

think i may have already posted this but its so strange that “check” as in “examine” comes from check in chess


Tags:

#what *are* words? we just don’t know #language #history #the more you know #chess #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

absolute-immunities:

ever since I learned about the “turned comma,” the rotated comma type that typographers once used as a superscript “c,” Michael G. Collins, M‘Culloch and the Turned Comma12 Green Bag 2d 265 (2009), I can’t help but notice when people get it wrong

Justice Kagan, for example, got it wrong in Kahler v. Kansas, No. 18-6135, slip op. at 2 (U.S. March 23, 2020):

0df86f5e02c2aa2beccaa0321fe02b20c15c0ec4
5b7f1aa59997b2852399e92bd18ff24dc0fc20ec

but it’s actually M‘Naghten’s Case (1843) 10 Cl. & Fin. 200, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (HL), as the report reveals:

179bcd9baa196089956d4675d7c7228f7d9d7d9a

word processors can’t rotate type, but we could approximate the “turned comma” much better if we used a single open quotation mark (‘) instead of an apostrophe (’), as Justice Kagan does here

or we could just use “c,” as we do for McCulloch v. Maryland17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819), even though the report reads:

6119080f112bf952a9122e35cf91781bb6c3ac1c

Tags:

#language #the more you know #embarrassment squick? #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

wolffyluna:

Today is the 169th anniversary of the removal of the Broad Street Pump handle.

In September of 1854, a cholera outbreak in London occurred, killing 616 people. Pioneering epidemiologist and anaesthisiologist worked to prove that the outbreak was caused by contaminated water and not miasma/“bad air.” He was able to trace the source of infection to the Broad Street well, and while the local parish authorities were doubtful, he managed to convince them to remove the handle from the pump, preventing people from drawing water from it.

On this day, pour out a non-alcoholic one for teetotaller John Snow, consider what models you believe in that may be flawed, thank a plumber, and if you can, give money to charity help more people have access to clean water.


Tags:

#history #anniversaries #illness tw #unsanitary cw #this post was queued to ensure proper timing