comparativelysuperlative:

shlevy:

iamamaiden:

last-snowfall:

amroyounes:

Believe it or not, the present is not as gloomy as you think

Please memorize the second one.

This is so important to me

I saw Scott posted this and I was really hoping to scroll down and see some plausible argument that this all stems from the elimination of lead.

Seriously though, this is good stuff to keep in mind.

About that second one, not that their point isn’t true, but the decade they selected was the 1940s. OK, so we’re not in the middle of a world war! Go us! But I’d really prefer a more typical and less cherry-picked example.

Agreed. I seem to recall that a previous time I saw someone use the 1940’s for this, someone responded with an explanation of how it’s still true even if you don’t use a world-war decade. However, I have no idea where I saw that, so take plenty of salt.

The first time I saw a calculation of how much data was on the Internet, it was five petabytes. To think, just a few years ago the entire Internet could be stored inside Data’s brain, with room to spare. We’ve come so far.


Tags:

#proud citizen of The Future #reply via reblog #Data’s storage capacity is 100 petabytes #what does it say about me that that is my first association with the word ‘petabyte’

theunitofcaring:

ozymandias271:

petition for theunitofcaring to get a real blog

Right now this would be a very bad idea! Hits on a blog are, as it happens, a quantifiable thing that changes every minute and tends to go up when I work harder. When presented with things like this, my brain adopts them as the totality of its self-esteem and stops working on all goals that are harder to measure/optimize. 

(last time I tried this I failed all my classes. I really suck at incentives.)

However! I have attained a software internship this summer and I should have more free time and capacity-to-motivate-myself-to-do-my-homework is less relevant and it would be really cool to have a real blog. So maybe I’ll do it then.

Perhaps there’s a way of preventing yourself from being able to see the analytics? Like that add-on that hides your Tumblr follower count. (I don’t know what add-on that is, but one of my friends has mentioned using it, so I know it exists.)

I don’t know you well enough to even hazard a guess at how difficult undoing the blocking would need to be for it to be effective, but it’s something to consider if and when you start looking into getting a long-form blog.

*signs petition, on condition of finding a way around self-esteem traps*


Tags:

#reply via reblog

cosmictuesdays:

camwyn:

graphicnerdity:

It’s all Harry’s fault. Well, partially. I suppose Voldemort can be saddled with an equal portion of the blame. The point is, the Dursleys were just minding their own business when a horcrux was dumped on their doorstep. For the next decade it proceeded to warp their minds, turning them from your garden variety insufferable human beings into horrible, heartless monsters. The fact that they survived such prolonged horcrux exposure without delving into insanity or abandoning a helpless child only solidifies their place among the pantheon of noble and virtuous heroes in the Harry Potter universe.

*Mic drop*

That… actually does kind of explain an awful lot, dunnit.

Damn, that’s some twisted meta.

…I thought this was going to be a “just say no to Horcruxes” joke.


Tags:

#Harry Potter #meta #…oh my god #I laughed at ‘Weasley children are particularly susceptible’ #and then I just stopped and stared #oh god

sjmillerart:

I’ve drawn a few creepy twisty Odos before, but I really wanted to explore what it might’ve been like in the show aand I wanted to draw more Odo being twisty. So this little comic sprung out of that!

This was a fun exercise and I learned a lot while putting it together. Like how much I love drawing Quark.

I mistook this for an excerpt from an official comic and was wondering where I could buy it.


Tags:

#Star Trek #DS9 #Odo #comic #fanart #awesome #fun with shapeshifting

{{previous post in sequence}}


brin-bellway:

justice-turtle:

girljanitor:

ameliated:

bad-dominicana:

skepticamongthefaithful:

kemetically-afrolatino:

source 1; source 2; source 3; source 4; source 5

WELP.

Stop what you are doing.

Read those.

Right now.

I’ll wait.

If you don’t want to read, I’ll explain the key bullet points, but please read them afterwords:

This is not “we didn’t protect him enough.”

This is not “the government screwed up some random detail or accidentally let his killer loose.”

The 111th Military Intelligence had a team taking pictures of his balcony during the assassination.

They brought in a Special Forces 8-Man Sniper Team from the 20th.

Memphis Police withdrew their regular protection detail from him.

A jury of 12 people, six black and six white, found the United States Government guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

YOUR GOVERNMENT. MY GOVERNMENT. THE GOVERNMENT OF, BY, AND FOR THE PEOPLE, SHOT AND KILLED DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING. And the media never reported the case.

MLK was ASSASSINATED. By a government YOU PAY FOR.

I hate those posts where someone tries to pressure you into reblogging. I almost never ask you to reblog.

This shit is important.

Reblog this. I don’t care what kind of blog you have. I don’t care what you normally talk about.

Reblog this.

holy shit

Not fucking surprised. I knew that the FBI was conducting a dedicated smear campaign against him and that anyone lobbying for Black civil rights was officially considered a communist sympathizer, therefore a threat to national security. MLK had just led / been part of the biggest civil rights march in history (where he gave his “I Have a Dream” speech); it makes a lot of sense that the government of the day would decide he was a threat to be “neutralized in any way possible”, as the line goes.

And it makes a lot of sense that the mainstream media wouldn’t report it when the government was found guilty. Does the mainstream media report anything prejudicial to the government as a whole? They do not. They report plenty of stuff prejudicial to individual politicians, and they print a fair number of op-ed pieces saying whatever their target audience thinks about current wars etc, but something huge like this? Something that would  upset the “official” view of The Great And Awesome Progress Of Civil Rights As A Government-Supported Thing From The Emancipation Proclamation To The Present Via Martin Luther King To The First Black President? NOT ON YOUR TINTYPE.

Personally, my bullshit alarm started ringing at “enemies of freedom”. Also, Source 1 is Wikipedia, whose own sources don’t make the trial look very legit from what I can tell, and Source 3 and Source 5 are both from conspiracy-theorist sites.

Bringing this back because I saw a similar post going around today.


Tags:

#Martin Luther King Jr. #conspiracy theories

comparativelysuperlative:

ozymandias271:

comparativelysuperlative I attended a gaming night last night and there were two Nates attending and I was like “yay! I will meet comparativelysuperlative!” and they turned out to be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND UNRELATED RATIONALIST NATES

plz obtain a less common name thank you

#1 most exciting Nate! And Nates are a disproportionately awesome segment of the population, too. I’m flattered!

(How does finding out they’re not me even come up? I feel like in that situation I’d think it’s too awkward to bring up directly so after failing to collect enough information to announce “I KNOW YOU FROM THE INTERNET” I’d just assume it’s probably someone else.)

Your surname is right there on the “About” page of your WordPress. Assuming neither of them shares it, that’s how to find out they’re not you. If one of them does share a reasonably common surname with you, that’s not enough evidence to assume, but it is enough to ask.


Tags:

#reply via reblog

would-you-like-a-jelly-baby:

amaranththallium:

curiosity-discoverer-of-worlds:

survivor-trek:

imagine data caring for you when you’re unable to care for yourself

imagine data being the constant in your life for seventy, eighty years

imagine data staying by your side because he is accustomed to your sensory input and he would miss you if you were gone

imagine data knowing that one day he will miss you and choosing to become accustomed to you anyway

imagine data.

Imagine Data knowing that one day he will miss you…

…unless he does something about it

Imagine Data developing new advances in technology

Imagine Data revolutinizing bio-engenering, genetics, prothesis and everything that can prolongue human life.

Imagine Data giving back to you the ability to care for yourself

Imagine Data being a constant in your life for seventy hundred or eighty hundred years.

Imagine Data knowing that one day humanity conquered the stars, that one day humanity created himself, proving that it could create life.

Imagine Data knowing that one day humanity (post-humanity, trans-humanity, alien-humanity) will conquer Death.

scientiststhesis michaelblume yxoque wrapscallion ozymandias271

@sharkyminimalist

It occurred to me, while I was thinking about this post, that Star Trek already has mind-uploading capabilities.

It is canon that the Borg keep copies of every mind they assimilate, which survive beyond the deaths of the drones they were copied from.

It is canon that under certain conditions, minds can be precipitated out of the hive-mind solution, even if you don’t have their original brain handy.

And, on second thought, the Trill also do exactly this, though under circumstances that are likely to have a lot more limitations.

(Huh, there are actually two Star Trek episodes focusing on how people there can live indefinitely, but only if they spend almost all the time as part of a hive mind, with no reasons given for why the technology couldn’t be used in a completely non-assimilating manner.)

The Feds have already used adapted stolen Borg technology to save lives. Think how many more they could save if they went a bit further.


Tags:

#Star Trek #transhumanism #I have never *called* myself a transhumanist #but I have noticed I tend to react to transhumanist writings with ‘I like the way you think’


{{next post in sequence}}

swedish idioms painfully literally translated into english

wordsinswedish:

useless-swedenfacts:

– now you’ve shat in the blue cupboard

– the taste is like the butt

– there’s no cow on the ice

– i sense owls in the marsh

– to walk like a cat around hot porridge

– don’t paint the devil on the wall

– to be out biking

– cake on cake

I’ve taken the liberty to give you the original Swedish versions and their meanings:

– Att skita i det blåa skåpet (to finally cross the line, to go too far)

– Smaken är som baken (no accounting for taste, to each his own)

– Ingen ko på isen (there’s no immediate danger)

– Ana ugglor i mossen (to sense something suspicious)

– Att gå som katten kring het gröt (to beat around the bush, to not speak directly on a topic)

– Att måla fan på väggen (to assume the worst)

– Att vara ute och cykla (to be very confused, to misunderstand something)

– Tårta på tårta / kaka på kaka (too much of a good thing; unnecessary repetition)

zephindles, I found a reblog chain with the meanings if you’re curious.


Tags:

#language #the more you know