etirabys:

On China’s transition from disdaining the English language to considering it very important for individual success:

“English fever” settled on waiters, CEOs, and professors, and elevated the language into a defining measure of life’s potential—a force strong enough to transform your résumé, help attract a spouse, or vault you out of a village. Men and women on Gong’s dating site often included their English proficiency in descriptions of themselves, alongside mention of cars and houses. Every college freshman had to meet a minimal level of English comprehension, and it was the only foreign language tested. In a novel called English, the author, Wang Gang, a teacher in a rural school, says, “If I rearranged the words in the [English] dictionary, the entire world would open up before me.”

This was a sharp reversal from the past. In nineteenth-century China, English was held in contempt as the language of the middlemen who dealt with foreign traders. “These men are generally frivolous rascals and loafers in the cities and are despised in their villages and communities,” the reformist scholar Feng Guifen wrote in 1861. But Feng knew that China needed English for diplomatic purposes, and he called for the creation of special language schools. “There are many brilliant people in China; there must be some who can learn from the barbarians and surpass them,” he wrote. Mao favored Russian for the country, and he expelled so many English teachers that, by the sixties, China had fewer than a thousand high school English teachers nationwide. After Deng opened China’s doors to the world, English fever took hold. Eighty-two percent of those polled in 2008 thought it was vital to learn English. (In America, 11 percent thought it was vital to learn Chinese.) By 2008 an estimated 200 million to 350 million Chinese were studying English.

On Li Yang, a celebrity English teacher

Li peered at the students and called them to their feet. They were doctors in their thirties and forties, selected by Beijing hospitals to work at the following summer’s Olympic Games. But like millions of English learners in China, they had almost no confidence speaking the language that they had spent years studying by textbook. Li had made his name with an ESL technique that a Hong Kong newspaper called English as a Shouted Language. Shouting, Li argued, was the way to unleash what he called the “international muscles.” Li stood before the students, his right arm raised in the manner of a tent revivalist, and launched them into English at the top of their lungs. “I!” he thundered. “I!” they thundered back.

“Would!”
“Would!”

“Like!”
“Like!”

“To!”
“To!”

“Take!”
“Take!”

“Your!”
“Your!”

“Tem! Per! Ture!”
“Tem! Per! Ture!”

One by one, the doctors tried it out. A woman in stylish black glasses said, “I would like to take your temperature.” Li gave a theatrical shake of his head and made her do it again. Her cheeks flushed, and in a sudden burst, she bellowed, “I would like to take your temperature!” Then came a thickset man in a military uniform who needed no encouragement—“I would like to take your temperature!”—followed by a tiny woman, who let out a paint-peeling scream. Around the room we went, each voice a bit more confident than the one before. I wondered how a patient might react, but before I could ask, Li was out the door, and on to another group in the adjoining classroom.

… 

He favored flamboyantly patriotic slogans such as “Conquer English to Make China Stronger!” On his website, he declared, “America, England, Japan—they don’t want China to be big and powerful! What they want most is for China’s youth to have long hair, wear bizarre clothes, drink soda, listen to Western music, have no fighting spirit, love pleasure and comfort! The more China’s youth degenerated, the happier they are!”


Tags:

#language #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #(”I wondered how a patient might react”) #China #interesting #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what

A Real Grammar Quiz (version 2) | Polysyllabic

{{Title link: http://www.polysyllabic.com/?q=node/349 }}

house-carpenter:

I had a productive day at work today browsing through the website of Karl Hagen, who seems like a pretty erudite and knowledgeable person. He has this very nice quiz, which is a “real grammar quiz”, in that it tests your understanding of morphosyntactic concepts (nouns, verbs, agreement, phrase structure, etc.) rather than the memorization of arbitrary rules about spelling, punctuation and word choice. It does suffer a little from the problem of a lot of morphosyntactic concepts not having particularly widely agreed-upon precise definitions, but I think most of the questions were reasonably unambiguous. I got 32/35 (you can see my marked results here).

 

nathanielbuildsatesseract:

12/35

I would post the I-am-below-average gif but I don’t actually know that that is below average.

 

evolution-is-just-a-theorem:

I got bored and didn’t finish but @ghostofasecretary you should do this

 

sigmaleph:

23/35

gonna pull the “this is not my native language” card


Tags:

#interesting #language #(22/35) #(there were a few where I tried and got it wrong) #(and there were *also* a few where I was just like #”I have never heard that jargon before in my life‚ how the hell should I know which of these answers fits it”) #(if I had no idea whatsoever I skipped the question rather than trying to guess) #(it’s not like a school exam where having a high grade is instrumentally useful in itself) #(so my grade here should purely reflect how much I know and not how lucky I am)

on why the lindworm had to be turned into a human

glumshoe:

“ooh the shepherd’s daughter turning the lindworm prince into a human is so cowardly, monsterfuckery 2k20” 

No, no, no. It’s actually not about monsterfucking this time. It’s about politics. She knew exactly what she was doing and it wasn’t about attraction. The royal family was obviously desperate if they were inviting peasant women to marry the crown prince, and with other people’s desperation comes the opportunity to push your own agenda. 

Keep reading


Tags:

#meta #fairy tales #dragon #interesting #nsfw text?

{{clarification note: sandersonsistersspellbook and books-n-cleverness are the same person}}

sandersonsistersspellbook:

do you ever think about how the series of events that lead to Dumbledore’s death in HBP was literally set into motion by Oliver Wood’s passion for Quidditch

 

sandersonsistersspellbook:

okay but literally I can’t stop thinking about this –

it is of course possible that Draco would have gotten the Death Eaters into the school some other way if the Vanishing Cabinet hadn’t created the perfect opportunity, but it wasn’t looking likely.

so like, it’s reasonable enough to assume that Dumbledore’s death (at the hands of Snape specifically, obviously I know he was going to die soon enough from the curse, but the timing does make a difference so I’m still focused on this) occurred because of the Death Eaters getting into the school. the reason the Death Eaters were able to get into the school was because of the Vanishing Cabinet in the Room of Requirement, which Draco repaired.

the Vanishing Cabinet ended up in the Room of Requirement over the summer of 1996, presumably (reasoning for this is in the next paragraph), and Draco discovered it there sometime in his 6th year. but the only reason he had even known what it was, and what it could do, was because he had spoken with….

Graham Montague, a Slytherin who was in 7th year in 1995-1996 (when Harry & co were in 5th year). Montague was shoved into the Vanishing Cabinet in that year by Fred and George Weasley, because he was a part of the Inquisitorial Squad and was presumably about to take points from the Weasley twins for doing something disruptive. and we know that Montague got stuck in a limbo between the two connected cabinets, due to one of them being broken – he could hear things being discussed in Borgin & Burkes, which is how he was able to let Malfoy know that the other “end of the tunnel”, or basically the other cabinet, was in Borgin & Burkes (which, Draco would already have seen as a 12-year-old, in the summer before his 2nd year, when he visited the shop with his father – fun fact, Harry hid in that exact cabinet while Lucius Malfoy was transacting with Borgin).

Montague would never have had this experience at all if the cabinet hadn’t been broken in the first place. but in fact, we know exactly how, when, why, and by whom the cabinet was broken.

it was in the fall of 1992, when Nearly Headless Nick observed that Harry had gotten in trouble with Filch, and prompted Peeves to drop that very same cabinet from a large height in order to cause a distraction for Filch, allowing Harry to get out of trouble.

why was Harry in trouble in the first place? because he was “tracking mud” in the corridors.

why was he tracking mud in the corridors? because Oliver Wood had had him out on the Quidditch pitch all day even though it had been literally storming outside. so Harry came into the castle drenched and splattered with mud.

Dumbledore literally died because of how obsessed Oliver Wood was with winning the Quidditch Cup.

thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

 

sandersonsistersspellbook:

sorry, one more thing – people keep reblogging this with tags that imply they think that this is like a “headcanon” or just “plausible” and while I get why you would think that, I need you to really understand how canonical this is because it’s Very canonical which is Ridiculous

to clarify:

the bits about the Vanishing Cabinet being the only real way he had to get the Death Eaters in, having heard about it from Montague and how that made him realize he could use them as a passage, etc – that was all clearly laid out in HBP, chapter 27 (The Lightning-Struck Tower).

Montague being shoved into the cabinet takes place in OOTP, chapter 28 (Snape’s Worst Memory).

Draco seeing the cabinet and Harry being in the cabinet is all in CoS, chapter 4 (At Flourish and Blotts).

and the entire situation with the Quidditch practice and the mud and Harry getting in trouble and Nick getting Peeves to drop the cabinet is in CoS, chapter 8 (The Deathday Party).

it’s the lined-up-dominoes meme, and it’s ridiculous. and it’s all on the page.

 

adeptarcanist:

It’s better than that.

Voldemort died because Harry was the master of the Elder Wand that Voldemort was trying to use.

Why was Harry the master? Because he overpowered its previous master, Draco, and won its allegiance.

Why was Draco master of the Elder Wand? Because he disarmed Dumbledore in the precise sequence being discussed, which relied on the vanishing cabinet.

Harry defeated Voldemort because of Oliver Wood’s passion for quidditch.

 

haus-of-starkid:

Technically, Draco lead to Dumbledores death twice. Both by getting the death eaters into the castle but also because if it weren’t for him stealing Neville’s rememberall, Harry wouldnt have ended up on the team at all, and consequentially, getting mud through the corridors

a66381e50744355c4b36b6fd5e7b38c383811acd

 

books-n-cleverness:

this is exactly the kind of hyper specific meme that I am here for!!!!


Tags:

#Harry Potter #meta #interesting #death tw

etirabys:

Recently, I’ve been fascinated the payoff matrix for two people who are breathing with their mouths very close to each other.

If they’re breathing out of sync – one person inhaling for the exact duration the other person exhales – then this is the worst case for both of them, because they both get stale air.

It’s maximally cooperative of them, and raises quality of total air intake, if they’re completely in sync. When they both exhale, they push a lot of stale air out, and when they inhale, combine their forces to bring new air into the area around their mouths.

The part I’m interested in is defection. The way you maximize your air quality is by setting your cycle slightly after theirs. They start clearing the air when they breathe in, so you get cleaner air if you wait until they’ve done a bit of it to start yourself. The air is best when they’ve just stopped but you’re still inhaling for a second.

The other part I’m interested in is: few people think about this, so if I defect on someone I’m making out with, they’re probably not going to know. It’s like the perfect crime.

After days of mulling over this, I told all this to the new person I’m seeing, and added, “I have defected on you several times, just to have the experience.” They found this amusing, and did not dislike me upon knowing how they’d been cheated. Again, this makes this the perfect defection. I recommend it to anyone else who craves the cheap thrill of ripping someone off.

I also think about this, but in the context of cuddling, so instead the conclusion I came to was that the optimal move is to simply never be face-to-face with the other person. I’ve never made out with anyone and have no plans to, so I hadn’t thought about how it would also be an issue (and one not as easily solved) in that context.


Tags:

#reply via reblog #interesting #unsanitary cw? #asphyxiation cw?

data point

carnalisation:

balioc:

oligopsalter:

As a reader, I like worldbuilding, even (and sometimes especially) the expository parts. I read SFF because it’s the genre that most delivers that. It feels actively annoying when I have to sit through Plot that I’ve seen a million times before to get to soak in a world that I haven’t, or even to look at (say) extruded D&D fantasy in fine everyday detail with new eyes.

I feel like this should be obvious, but I still see, pretty regularly, appeals to authors to stop so much worldbuilding and focus on what obviously really matters to presumed readers, the story. I’m sure there are plenty of readers for whom that’s true! Good for them! But it’s not universal and we’re living in a long-tail world. Unless you’re right on the edge of being able to write full-time and writing to market means the difference between having a day job or not, don’t let The Average Reader become a sort of imperative-issuing Big Other. I would guess there are many more readers who love baroque expository worldbuilding than there are people who are really into, I don’t know, mpreg werewolf fanfiction, but there’s a thriving audience for that and more power to them, so don’t let them hog all the fun!

Amen.

This can be applied more generally to showing-versus-telling, I think.  If you’ve got something that’s more interesting than the beat-by-beat progression of your yarn, you should tell us about it, rather than slicing it up into little pieces and embedding those pieces in the unfolding plot.

…but then again, I read splatbooks for fun, so maybe I’m not the best person to ask.

…but I’m probably not the only one who does that kind of thing.

Regarding “show don’t tell” – I went through books at an immense speed as a child. Real-life social interactions were mystifying, but books offered me all they lacked: they explained what was happening, why it was happening, what people felt when it happened, and how their reactions related to their feelings. It was a cheat sheet for human behavior, and it made little me more empathetic and interested in people even when my experiences with them were unpleasant.
When I encounter books that took “show don’t tell” to heart, they confuse and sometimes anger me. What do the characters mean by raising an eyebrow, or blinking slowly? Why are they reacting with anger here, and nonchalance there, and why do your other characters treat that as meaningful and informative?
It’s like dramatic face shots in movies, where the actors stare blandly at something and there’s emotional music and it’s obvious it’s supposed to convey something, but I never know what that is.
There’s a weird opposite phenomenon of characters reading facial expressions and narrating their readings “the look in his eyes told me he was deeply troubled by what he just saw” – they’re eyes! They’re orbs with lenses and people use them to see. How can you tell?
Obviously reading facial expressions is not magic for everyone. Still, I miss being catered to by writers allowing me to get a good view of the inside of character’s heads without having to throw up my hands and say “well I guess these people have reasons and emotions but I’ll never know which, thanks a lot”.


Tags:

#re: OP: #yes this #I looked in the notes and found this branch #which is not *as* pure in its Yes-This-ness as the OP #but is interesting and definitely has its moments of relatability #(I distinctly recall going on a similar rant about ”the look in their eyes” in my early teens) #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #autism

rabb.it alternative

woppy42:

HELLO YES I have found an actual good solution to our dearly departed rabb.it!

It is…. *drumroll*… 

Discord screen sharing!

I think most people have Discord nowadays (and if you don’t, get it, it is eight million times better than Skype and requires way less personal information)

If you have a chat of up to 9 members, just hit that video call button

05673dffa05a5f1f86eb28557415c3088a89d0c3

After the call starts, hit the “Screen Share” icon

01bedcf3e5de4c89351b196553d7e7f12de788ef

Click the “Application Window” tab, then select the window that has Netflix/Hulu/Youtube/whatever open

24e06661e39d9f2f2b3afa3a0c5ad17e529ca260

Make sure that the “sound” toggle is on so that people can hear the sound playing in that window

f8ed886c53934002faf70e18896ad0b2bb9f1447

And then once it’s shared, just pull up your Netflix/Youtube/whatever window up and press play! 

Only that window will be shared, so you can go back to the Discord window and chat with people without interrupting the video. You can voice chat over it as well, if you want!

The highest video settings without Nitro are 30fps, but when I tested it the video and audio were both pretty good. Better than rabbit, according to the friend I was testing it with. :D

The only drawback I’ve found is this: 

ae3092207df8006d473d252ae50eeaf638d02c57

But overall, it seems like this is the best option compared to the limited rabbit alternatives I’ve tested so far. 

Go forth and watch stuff together! 

(screenshots pulled from this discord support page)

 

woppy42:

A little more detail: Currently (July 9 2019) the only way to HOST is by using the Discord app on a Windows computer, but you can WATCH via the app, browser, or mobile app on Windows or Mac.

Also, audio might not work if you use firefox, so just open up your video in a Chrome browser and it should work fine.

If anyone else has tips to add, please do!

 

mostlyanything19:

@canolacrush


Tags:

#Discord #interesting #the more you know #(I never used rabb.it myself) #(I’ve done plenty of watching TV together with Internet friends but it’s always been bring-your-own-copy)

princesszeldaz:

who’s the klutzy Hyrule ditz dropping all their rupees in grass????

 

criticalbread:

a few years ago when I was really REALLY in to Twilight Princess and none of the newer ones had come out yet, and I had planned to write some Very Intense Fanfiction, I decided that I would make it a worldbuilding thing. Like, a cultural phenomenon in Hyrule where people go out of their way to hide rupees all over the place– along roadways and streams, in grass, under rocks, in old pots no one has used in years, or in old shoes, under fallen logs, under big honking rocks that no one has any reason to move. Originally, it was meant to be a sign of goodwill to travelers and those down on their luck, of community generosity and goodwill. Anyone can go out, comb a bit, and scrounge up enough for a meal. Or kids can run around having fun playing their seeking games and find enough for a sling shot, or a sweet. Parents teach their kids not to take more than they really need, to put some back, to keep the chain going. They make a game of it. Who can find the best hiding place? Who can climb to the highest branch, or swim to the bottom of the pond. 

They tend to end up heavily clustered in the grass and under rocks along the main roads and paths. People leave out their old, well loved pots and butter churns and tipped over tubs, collect pretty rocks and bits of crystal, grow their herbs and bushes just a bit that wild out front– all to make an attractive place to maybe tuck a green or a red under. For some it’s a point of pride; for all, it tells you a bit about the person who lives there. It’s even practical, when you think of it! We all sometimes end up a little short, but there’s always some from the community to find, or something to tuck for yourself int he future when you realize you’re a bit skint. And when you’ve got a bit extra, well, it’s just NORMAL to go and find a little place to tuck it away and imagine who might find it. Maybe soon. Maybe in a few weeks or months. Maybe years, or decades. Don’t we all get a little big of excitement from the thought?

Communities don’t have really deep poverty that you can’t climb out of, not in Hyrule. There’s no embarrassment to have to pop out and look around a bit to afford a bit of milk or if you’ve forgot your wallet. If someone’s a bit too old or can’t see too well, there’s no shame in hinting, “Under the flower pot, grandma,” or, “Tomla, run out and fetch Mr. Tinkins a few rupees, there’s a love, always good at finding the odd ones out, that girl.” 

Sometimes you find shiny rupees that weren’t hidden too well (maybe by that ferociously sweet village kid who keeps hiding them as quick as he’s finding them, bless him, just not very well). Maybe they hadn’t been there long. The contrast is huge when you find dusty, dirt-encrusted things that you think must be at least a few decades old. And then, sometimes you go digging back, adventuring down into the deep places and the old places where no one has traveled in centuries and you turn over a pot or open a little chest no bigger than a bottle and feel a little shiver to think of how long ago someone put this here. A little thankfulness to an ancestor, a little appreciation, a little shock because a silver rupee? Really??! How rich had they been, how powerful the empire, now all in ruins…

Sometimes in his travels, Link comes upon an old, dusty rupee tucked under an ancient discarded shield or a particularly handsome but impossible to move boulder that only a little magic or magical strength can budge. He grabs up the rupee under and feels a little shiver of familiarity… :)

 

shiisiln:

@kintatsujo

 

kintatsujo:

This is utterly beautiful

 

itsbenedict:

I mean, this is charming, but the downside of this tradition is that occasionally you get some madman running through town, screaming and spinning wildly around in circles with a fucking SWORD, obliterating everything in sight in an uncontrollable frenzy of pure greed.

 

humanfist:

To be fair that madman is typically in the process of saving the kingdom.


Tags:

#headcanons #Legend of Zelda #interesting

illidanstr:

salt, fat, acid, heat is the cooking book i always wanted but didn’t know what to ask for

it is so good

it explains how cooking works.  which nobody else ever bothers to actually describe in even the most miserable faintest detail.  it is what I was hoping the modernist cuisine books would be:  the equivalent of a description of what the parts of a computer or the function of subnetting in a network but for sauces and meats and vegetables

many things are starting to make sense and I’m barely even into the book.  here is an idea I had: so much “american” food is so lacking in acids, which is why americans are famous for adding ketchup to everything.  is ketchup as the universal sauce for everything you can imagine terrible?  yes.  is that grossly terrible?  obviously.  would a fermented ingredient like pickle, a wine vinegar to baste in, fresh citrus or grated parmesan added after the food is done be better for that specific dish?  yes.  is it better than not having any acid at all?  also yes.  which is why people add ketchup and get used to the habit of doing it; you’ve got salt, umami, sugar, and acid packaged together as an indulgence which can never remove the sins of the cook but can paper over the most egregious violations of decency

(would this explain part of why so many traditional cuisines rely on heavily fermented foods?  if you don’t have the range of acids at hand we do now, you still need some way to kick the whole meal up to par..)

fats greatly enhance flavor and make foods moist.  so when you take out all the fats, like we did with “fat-free” food, you get disgusting dry results.  that’s why Costco food always tastes better than any of the grocery chains; it’s full of cream and butter.  

it even explains why cooking from a recipe is so tortured: there are endless variables in your ingredients and cooking environment you could never ever fix as either the author of the recipe or the person working from it.  do you know from a label exactly how sweet or acidic the specific batch of tomatoes or oranges you are using is when it varies from basket to basket in the orchard? no, but it could be critical.  that’s why your focus has to be on the food; watching it, listening to it, tasting it; the chaos of oven temperatures varying through time and space doesn’t matter quite so much when you have all of the tools at hand to know when to adjust and compensate!

modernist cuisine, in comparison, tries to find ways to statistically monitor and fix the variables using tech (sous vide, obviously – your steak is mathematically guaranteed to end up evenly medium rare all the way through, then you blowtorch it for the sear without the variance of coals on a grill!)  which is also cool, but this! this, is what I was looking for.


Tags:

#food #interesting