Real talk; where are the good hypnosis communities at
Getting real tired of transphobic shit etc. and would like somewhere to hang out and be into hypnosis without having to put with garbage people
Neither @brin-bellway nor @bannableoffense are garbage people to my knowledge. (Though they may separately be sanitation workers.)
@adzolotl manages to hypnotize trans people without them being annoyed. (Though perhaps they’re too hypnotized to??)
And … none of them seem to know each other in a hypnosis-y way. But they may be able to *direct* you to community things if you ask?
>>(Though they may separately be sanitation workers.)<<
Well, I have been experimenting with dumpster diving…
>>And … none of them seem to know each other in a hypnosis-y way.<<
I’m aware of Banny, though I don’t read her blog. I’m aware of @adzolotl, too, and I do read his blog. (I’m not sure we’ve ever had more than short, shallow conversations about it, though.)
>>But they may be able to *direct* you to community things if you ask?<<
The only members of hypno-fetish Tumblr I follow myself are @tennfan2, @ellaenchanting, and @hypnoticharlequin, because I try to keep the amounts of naked people, non-con porn, and Discourse on my dash relatively low, and all of those really limit your options. (However, since the Discourse is often about social justice, and the hypno-fetishist is almost invariably on the pro-SJ side, you may actually find the amount of Discoursing around here reassuring.) I also read @diaryofasnowflake manually sometimes.
Tennfan, Ella: I seem to recall you’ve both done welcoming-wagon-type stuff before, right? Can you help show Beanie the ropes, so to speak?
>>#does tagging people violate the NAP?<<
The what? If you mean something about revealing somebody’s kink without their consent, all of the people you tagged have been pretty open about it on Tumblr, so it seems reasonable to me.
The NAP is the non-aggression principle. Which is an ethical rule that says that it is immoral to instigate aggression against someone. (Unless they want to be aggressed. Self-defense and attempts at de-escalation are also usually considered moral here.)
The tag was self-deprecation about my hesitancy in tagging people in things because my brain worries that it will harm them. Which it probably won’t. If it did, I think I can count on them or someone close to them to tell me.
The mechanism of amusement sprung from the contrast between (the central examples of (the most conceptually available, not the most common uses of) the NAP such as acting in self defense when people hit you or shooting someone who has tresspassed on your property) and (tagging someone in a tumblr post).
—
[ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle ]
Tags:
#(February 2017) #conversational aglets #sexuality and lack thereof
Brinens and Things 
One thought on “”