*
Quite apart from whether their arguments are correct, the main problem I have with kink-critical and porn-critical feminism is that their definitions of “kink” and “porn” feel *really* weird to me.
I would say that I’m kinky and that I consume porn. And I think it’s reasonable of me to define these terms in ways that cover me (what terms should I use, if not these?). But I’m not into pain and I’m not into power exchange (let alone non-con) and I’m not into video, so I end up in this unnerving grey area where people *appear* to oppose me, but none of the reasons they give for *why* they oppose me actually *apply* to me, so do they oppose me or not?
Like, am I vanilla-by-default in their worldview, not being into the things they define as “kink”? In what universe do *I*, of all people, qualify as vanilla?
(…maybe the universe I encountered in this post?)
Tags:
#not really ”vagueblogging” so much as inspired by the general discourse going on around me lately #sexuality and lack thereof #discourse cw #oh look an original post #our roads may be golden or broken or lost #(sort of) #nsfw text
Brinens and Things 
One thought on “”