#Doctor Who #dw spoilers #Under the Lake #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #’I should have specified before you agreed to come with me that most of my friends end up’ #’dead/trapped/erased from history/memory wiped’
KNEEL, SAYS THE DEMON LIGHT WITH ITS EYE OF COAL SAURON KNOWS YOUR LICENSE PLATE AND STARES INTO YOUR SOUL
THIS IS ALWAYS FUNNY
I’ve only seen this legendary post in screenshots
Omg
Tags:
#you’ve probably seen this before #in fact you’ve probably seen this *so* many times that it is a comforting point of familiarity #here is some comforting familiarity for you
I read an interview with this guy (who is a real news anchor), and he said he told his acting agent that he is ONLY interested in parts where he plays a new anchor. This is no coincidence. This is by design.
Are turtlenecks not girls’ clothes? I thought they were girls’ clothes…
In theory, my brother and I each own a few turtlenecks.
In practice, we frequently have trouble figuring out which turtlenecks are whose when sorting laundry, and it is likely that at least one of our turtlenecks is currently hanging in the closet of a different person than the one it was bought for.
(My brother and I have also shared polo shirts, but he refused to wear some of mine because they were too pastel. If he thought turtlenecks were feminine-coded, he wouldn’t wear them. I don’t have enough information to say for sure if his opinion is a common one, but for what it’s worth.)
We buy most of our clothing, and pretty much all of our interchangeable clothing, from Lands’ End. You might want to check them out. (Try looking in the kids’ section; we wear the largest kids’ size. Looking at the website, apparently the gendering works like this: “girls”, “boys”, and an at-least-somewhat-hidden “kids” category whose members appear in both sections. I haven’t poked around enough to determine if there’s a way to browse the androgynous section specifically.)
Ok so staff just released info about this new update, and while it seems like an effective way to cut off any lurking, hateful anons, or the possibility of anyone seeing your blog that you don’t want to, it also cuts off a lot of other useful features as well.
I conducted a little to test to see how it works by turning off the “show this blog on the web” feature on this blog, and using a dummy blog to see how it works.
First things first, using this feature eliminates your URL completely. You as the blog owner are not even able to view your blog at the URL address. I tried WHILE I was signed in to my blog and it still would not allow me.
Obviously if you as the blog owner can’t see it also means no one, including mutuals, can see your blog either. There are only two ways you can still view a users content: The mobile side view and posts that come across your dash.
This feature also eliminates the use of read more’s. When you click the read more link it takes you to the permalink, which is part of your URL, which no longer exists.
You are still able to search within tumblr for blogs and follow people and people can search for you, but as I said above, even if you are following a person or they are a mutual, they will never be able to view your actual blog page again.
If you are not comfortable losing your blog page completely, even from your own personal view, then I would not suggest using this feature.
Signal boosting this, because of a lot of blogs I follow have done this, and now I can’t read half the shit they post as a result. I don’t think they realise the issue with the read more thing.
