psych-is-the-name:

bilbobagginsomebabez:

beatrice-otter:

bilbobagginsomebabez:

28cb7dc06c76b99aa115bfca6cd002e6766dd68a
37c598db12ff0995682f04ad12ca02830fd30d56
c413993d2c49c8456dae8e85e20808f3c2db3cca
d69b81c05dd925a8437435b3b5dd52d4c068fd75

genuinely friendly reminder to never EVER share someone’s location/information without their explicit permission. you do not know why that person is asking, what they plan to do with that information, or even if the asker has that person’s best interest in mind at all.

OP is also not exaggerating how common this is. my abusive parents successfully kidnapped me from work once because a coworker who didn’t know my situation told them when my next shift was. my parents didn’t even know where I lived at that point in time, which was very much on purpose. it took me days to get away again. ALWAYS tell the person that is being looked for that someone is looking. never share personal information or even how to get in contact them. you can take information in and pass it along, but you absolutely cannot give any out.

[image descriptions: screencap of tweets from rahaeli @rahaeli 7/9/21.

Hello friends, your regular reminder that a not insignificant number of social media “missing person” efforts are actually someone’s abuser trying to get them back, especially with missing older teens. Please don’t share unofficial missing person flyers–

–and if you do spot/know the person in them, tell THAT PERSON someone is looking for them instead of providing any information to the person doing the looking.

I cannot tell you how many times I have seen a site wide “missing person” turn into the person writing in to ask us to enforce the restraining order, or the custodial parent begging us to shut down the non custodial parent’s attempted kidnapping

Every time I say this, someone says “but what if it’s real, better safe than sorry” and no, it absolutely is not. For a good while I got “this is my abuser, please make them stop” requests for 70-80% of the viral unofficial missing persons crossing my feed.

This number is obviously anecdata–I’ve never been able to find a peer reviewed study attempting to pin down prevalance. But based on those experiences, I absolutely advise never sharing one of those posts.

(I used to finish this PSA thread saying that if a missing person alert came from police or a federal agency, it had likely been screened for abusive tactics and was more likely to be real. I no longer say this.)

This should be your principle for any time someone wants you to connect them with someone else, btw. Never give someone’s info to the person who asked. Tell the asker you’ll give that third party THEIR contact info instead.

–and if you do spot/know the person in them, tell THAT PERSON someone is looking for them instead of providing any information to the person doing the looking.

I will probably be muting this in a bit, but some followup: for those questioning “just how often does this happen, even?”, I wasn’t keeping an exact count but I think we just hit double digits of people saying “this happened to me/a friend” in replies to QTs of this

As in, of the current 70 or so quote tweets, around 10% of them have a person telling a story about a time their abuser faked a social media post expressing concern over them as a missing/vulnerable person in order to continue abusing them.

It’s not rare. It’s not unusual. It is, in fact, vastly more common than *any* dangerous situation in which social media attention can do literally anything to improve the situation. (I’ve rarely seen a dangerous situation massive social media attention can improve, honestly.)

To the people who want to argue about this advice: I have, more than once, personally seen an abuser’s viral missing persons post end in suicide or homicide. I have never in 20 years seen a case of stranger kidnapping at all, much less one that’s resolved by virality.

All I’m asking you to understand is that the abusers who do this are very, very good at convincing you their “missing person” is irrational, in danger, or has diminished capacity. You will never be able to spot these situations by reading over a single post. Ever.

If you want to retweet missing personsviral alerts because you want to do good in the world, please understand that there is a much, much greater statistical chance you are *actually* contributing to making things much worse for the person instead. Please just think about that.

And to answer the “well why are you qualified to say this”, since this has gotten way out of my usual circles: hi, I’ve been working trust and safety/ToS on social media for 20 years now. I am never, ever the person with the worst stories when I go out drinking with others.

/end id]

If you’re doubting this the thing you have to remember is that stranger kidnapping is very rare, for either children or adults. The vast majority of the time, when someone is kidnapped or held against their will, it’s by someone they already know, someone close to them: a parent, a partner, that sort of thing. So if someone has been kidnapped or whatever, the people closest to them (who are usually the ones to put up missing posters and whatnot) should be the first suspects, not the last. It’s possible that the person putting up the missing person fliers is the parent who has custody and the noncustodial parent kidnapped the kids … but it’s just as possible that the person putting up fliers is the noncustodial parent who is doing this as part of a plot to find the kids so they can kidnap them. You can’t tell which is which just from seeing the flyer.

And when people choose to leave voluntarily and cut all contact with people close to them, they don’t just do it on a whim. There’s pretty much always a reason. For example, the people they’re cutting contact with might be shitty and abusive. Now, the reason might also be “the person leaving is messed up by drugs” or whatnot, or “they’re being forced by an abuser to cut contact.” Those are also reasons. Buta lot of people who cut contact with someone in their life do it for very good and valid reasons. You can’t tell which is which just from seeing the flyer.

rb this version with image descriptions please

remember this especially now with so many trans and gay people fleeing states that are passing anti lgbtq laws

i guarantee there’s going to be homophobic families saying their “mentally disturbed family member” is missing


Tags:

#PSA #abuse cw #stalking cw #(for those of you who don’t recognise rahaeli‚ she co-founded Dreamwidth) #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

roach-works:

dharmagun:

Higgledy-piggledy
unparliamentary
green parrots quarrel
outside in the trees

Squawking out epithets
uncomplimentary
Squads of unmannerly
Oversized peas.

i loved this poem so much that i memorized it and to this day i sometimes mutter it under my breath to keep my welding tempo even


Tags:

#this isn’t quite a that-one-post-with-the-thing but it *is* a surprised-I-haven’t-already-reblogged-this #poetry #birds #my past self has good taste #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

menlovingtranny:

I have OCD and with that comes quasi-hallucinations, and I grew up watching a ton of horror films so some of the worst of mine are the standard white skin/black hair demon girl type shit.

However, because a lot of them are based on horror film I have found comfort in doing things that “go against” horror films and being like “see? This could never happen.”

(It’s irrational. I know that. But shut up. This is how I cope.)

For example: I started hearing garbled whispering from beneath my table, so I started playing the muppets sound track. Because they would never play Movin’ Right Along when the protagonist is about to get attacked. That won’t happen. Disney, who owns the muppets, wouldn’t give them the rights.

And it fucking worked.

98c43acd4c4471dc902e42a6a959bb9340867566

Tags:

#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #(”Disney‚ who owns the muppets‚ wouldn’t give them the rights”) #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

{{previous post in sequence}}


oligetcetera-deactivated2023072:

toddler youtube reviewed

sesame street: “yes,” I see you nodding along, “sesame street, good stuff, 12/10, or maybe less, did HBO make it bad?” I got bad news for you bub – no, not about HBO, about your whole televisual ontology. the reason you can remember sesame street fondly – the characters with distinct personalities, the engagement with the whole range of human experience, all the little jokes about James Joyce or whatever – is that’s good tv, but it isn’t toddler yt. that’s a compliment from any perspective other than “I need to hypnotize my kid while I clip his nails,” which is why this genre exists in the first place. it might get his attention because it’s on a screen but so would whatever 3 hour video game essay that you want to watch anyway. I look forward to watching sesamestraße and bluey and so on but you gotta crawl before you walk, in this case literally

miss rachel: my standby. first, the hypnotism works, and second, there’s nothing really subtly disturbing from an adult perspective. you’d think that would be less rare but here we are. it’s BORING for an adult but bearable because 1) not gonna lie, I know this is the sort of thing that gets old men turned into fascists by fox, but miss rachel is very good looking, or at least she’s “my type” leaving aside the professional high-pitched voice and 2) okay to objectify slightly less it is impressive how good she is at it. I’ve copied her at some things and am better at holding the kid’s attention while I explain things. the most human things can get while still being toddler yt

cocomelon: sesame street is an adult show labelled for kids, miss rachel is how a human adult would go about entertaining a child. cocomelon is a sort of formalist experiment, a sort exploration of just how high-dosage you can get while remaining *comprehensible* to adults. aside from of course the talking animals and songs that appear in all of these, cocomelon is rigorously “realistic” but appears to take place in an emotionally flatter reality than our own, which is why it’s right along the thalweg line of the uncanny valley. if AGI is subtly misaligned and produces a world of “human flourishing” without any human subjective experience, I believe that cocomelon is video footage from such a world.

hey bear: don’t worry, keep hiking, you’ll get out of the valley eventually. as you ascend the slope out there is a bear, and the bear is the result of an optimization process of toddler hypnotism that has a wider search space than you, and has abandoned the pretense of representational art entirely. when atoms die in fission plants and god sends them to purgatory, this is what they see


Tags:

#see also #I salute people who are doing their best to parent ethically while on the hockey-stick part of the technological-development slope #the situation‚ as they say‚ is evolving rapidly #may God have mercy on us all #reactionblogging #the more you know #infohazards? #this probably deserves some other warning tag but I am not sure what

Anonymous asked: rot13ed due to mentioning n s f w topics. not sure if you’re comfortable receiving this kind of ask, ignore it if it bothers you. “cbea vf n purnc xabpxbss irefvba bs fbzrguvat ryfr” bxnl Ze. oenva travhf cyrnfr gryy zr jurer v pna svaq gur erny yvsr crbcyr orvat vasyngrq yvxr n onyybba (naq abg orvat unezrq orlbaq zvyq rzoneenffzrag va gur cebprff)? orpnhfr v jbhyq irel zhpu yvxr gb svaq guvf. lbh unir ab vqrn ubj zhpu v jbhyq yvxr gb svaq guvf. (npghnyyl, lbh’ir orra ba gur vagrearg zbfg bs lbhe yvsr. lbh cebonoyl unir n cerggl tbbq vqrn bs ubj zhpu v’q yvxr gb svaq guvf.)

{{Translation of ask:

“porn is a cheap knockoff version of something else” okay Mr. brain genius please tell me where i can find the real life people being inflated like a balloon (and not being harmed beyond mild embarrassment in the process)? because i would very much like to find this. you have no idea how much i would like to find this. (actually, you’ve been on the internet most of your life. you probably have a pretty good idea of how much i’d like to find this.)}}

eightyonekilograms:

oligetcetera-deactivated2023072:

On the contrary, this is a delightfully unique ask! Thanks, even if I can’t give a satisfying answer. But since you did:

Nyevtug, fb svefg, V jnag gb gunax lbh orpnhfr guvf jnf n ernyvgl purpx ntnvafg zl fhccbfvgvbaf. Gur fgngrzrag nf V bevtvanyyl znqr vg qbrfa’g fgnaq hc gb zhpu fpehgval; abg whfg va pnfrf yvxr lbhef ohg va rira gur zbfg znvafgernz gnfgr. Snagnfvrf nera’g ernyvgl be rira n cbbe irefvba bs ernyvgl, naq gurer ner cyragl bs pnfrf jurer gurl’er npgviryl orggre; pregnvayl gur onqarff qbrfa’g sybj bire: vg jbhyq or na hahfhny zbanzbebhf crefba jub qvqa’g fbzrgvzrf snagnfvmr nobhg bgure crbcyr, rira gubhtu purngvat vf jebat; gur oybbqyhfg vaqhytrq va fubbgref be zrtnybznavn va fgengrtl tnzrf jbhyq or qnatrebhf va nabgure pbagrkg ohg svar va vg, naq fb ba. V jba’g fnl vg arire pneevrf bire nf na veba cevapvcyr ohg pregnvayl V jbhyqa’g ybbx ng na vasyngvba srgvfu nfxnapr va gur fnzr jnl V zvtug fbzrbar jvgu rynobengr snagnfvrf bs gbeghevat fgenatref gb qrngu, rira gubhtu npghnyyl vasyngvat fbzrbar jbhyq or onq, nf lbh abgr. V yvxr tevzqnex ECTf naq gurl’er gurve bja tbbq guvat naq abg n cnyr ersyrpgvba bs npghny tevz qnexarff, juvpu vf onq.

Jung V guvax V jbhyq fgvyy fgnaq ol vf gung V guvax cbeabtencul, ng gur irel yrnfg va gur zbqny pnfr, vf n fhcrefgvzhyhf va n jnl V frr xvaq bs rirelguvat geraqvat gbjneqf. Cbeabtencul vf cebonoyl yrff qnatrebhf guna zbfg bgure fhcrefgvzhyv bs guvf fbeg orpnhfr hayrff lbh tb bss gur qrrc raq lbh’er abg fcraqvat sberire ba vg, nygubhtu V guvax gurer’f na vapragvir tenqvrag gbjneqf gung. Jura zl qnq pnzr bire ur jbhyq whfg ynl ba gur pbhpu naq jngpu Snvy Nezl ivqrbf sbe ubhef; boivbhfyl gurer’f n ovttre vffhr gurer jvgu yvxr jbexcynpr rkunhfgvba (qhqr arrqf gb ergver) ohg vg frrzf jbefr.

Be gb chg vg zber pbapergryl naq yvzvgvat guvatf gb zl bja pnfr, V guvax zl bja fgvzhyhf (une) gb dhvg cbea pbyq ghexrl jnf yvxr qvfpbirevat ba erqqvg gurfr yvxr cebterffviryl zber naq zber rssvpvrag qryvirel zrpunavfzf, sebz nzvanxrq bs zl lbhgu juvpu jbhyq pbyyngr cvpf sebz bgure fvgrf ba gb gur ghor fvgrf naq erqqvgc naq erqqvgyvfg sbe qvfpbirel hagvy gurer jnf whfg bar jurer vg znpuvar yrneavatrq jung lbh hcibgrq naq fubjrq lbh zber naq zber bs gung, naq V qrpvqrq, “shpx, V’ir nyjnlf orra onq ng frys-pbageby, V’z ab zngpu sbe guvf.” V qba’g yvxr gur zrqvpnyvmvat ynathntr bs “nqqvpgvba” ohg gurer vf qrsvavgryl n curabzrabybtl bs “uhu V jvfu V unqa’g qbar fb zhpu bs gung, ubj pna V znxr zlfrys srry orggre nobhg vg bu k” juvpu V fgvyy srry nobhg n ybg bs guvatf bxnl zbfgyl fbpvny zrqvn jvgu yvxrf. (Urapr jul V ervapneangr urer fb bsgra. Juvpu V guvax unf npghnyyl jbexrq bhg cerggl jryy – vs V unq orra fgrnqvyl npphzhyngvat sbyybjref urer sbe n qrpnqr V guvax gung yriry bs rkcbfher jbhyq or onq.)

(Naljnl n pbhcyr lrnef yngre naq gur fpnel cbea qryvirel zrpunavfz vf abj gur rknpg zbqry lbhat crbcyr hfr gb qvfpbire nyy zrqvn, yby! Ubcr gung tbrf jryy.)

Xrrcvat hc jvgu guvf fjrnevat bss bs cbea unf orra gbhtu guvf cnfg unys lrne jurer zl cnegare nera’g dhvgr nf zngpurq va yvovqb nf jr hfrq gb or, ohg gubfr guvatf syhpghngr naq gou gur vqrn bs n “fgernx” pna or vgf bja tnzvsvrq zbgvingvba, naq fbzrgvzrf jura V’z gelvat gb tvir zlfrys n crc gnyx gung V’z zber pncnoyr guna V tvir zlfrys perqvg sbe gung’f jung V’yy pvgr, ba zl bja sbe-vagreany-hfr erfhzr.

Naljnl lbh jrer cebonoyl ubcvat sbe fbzr VEY vasyngvba gvcf juvpu V’z abg dhnyvsvrq gb tvir. (V pbhyq nfx PungTCG, ohg fb pbhyq lbh, naq V qrsvavgryl jbhyqa’g jnag gb fnl nalguvat nobhg gur zrqvpny nqivfnovyvgl bs nalguvat vg fhttrfgrq! Shaal bar gb vzntvar hfvat gur tenaqzn rkcybvg ba gubhtu yby.) Ohg znlor zl sbyybjref pna uryc – nal gnxref?

{{Translation of response:

Alright, so first, I want to thank you because this was a reality check against my suppositions. The statement as I originally made it doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny; not just in cases like yours but in even the most mainstream taste. Fantasies aren’t reality or even a poor version of reality, and there are plenty of cases where they’re actively better; certainly the badness doesn’t flow over: it would be an unusual monamorous person who didn’t sometimes fantasize about other people, even though cheating is wrong; the bloodlust indulged in shooters or megalomania in strategy games would be dangerous in another context but fine in it, and so on. I won’t say it never carries over as an iron principle but certainly I wouldn’t look at an inflation fetish askance in the same way I might someone with elaborate fantasies of torturing strangers to death, even though actually inflating someone would be bad, as you note. I like grimdark RPGs and they’re their own good thing and not a pale reflection of actual grim darkness, which is bad.

What I think I would still stand by is that I think pornography, at the very least in the modal case, is a superstimulus in a way I see kind of everything trending towards. Pornography is probably less dangerous than most other superstimuli of this sort because unless you go off the deep end you’re not spending forever on it, although I think there’s an incentive gradient towards that. When my dad came over he would just lay on the couch and watch Fail Army videos for hours; obviously there’s a bigger issue there with like workplace exhaustion (dude needs to retire) but it seems worse.

Or to put it more concretely and limiting things to my own case, I think my own stimulus (har) to quit porn cold turkey was like discovering on reddit these like progressively more and more efficient delivery mechanisms, from aminaked of my youth which would collate pics from other sites on to the tube sites and redditp and redditlist for discovery until there was just one where it machine learninged what you upvoted and showed you more and more of that, and I decided, “fuck, I’ve always been bad at self-control, I’m no match for this.” I don’t like the medicalizing language of “addiction” but there is definitely a phenomenology of “huh I wish I hadn’t done so much of that, how can I make myself feel better about it oh x” which I still feel about a lot of things okay mostly social media with likes. (Hence why I reincarnate here so often. Which I think has actually worked out pretty well – if I had been steadily accumulating followers here for a decade I think that level of exposure would be bad.)

(Anyway a couple years later and the scary porn delivery mechanism is now the exact model young people use to discover all media, lol! Hope that goes well.)

Keeping up with this swearing off of porn has been tough this past half year where my partner aren’t quite as matched in libido as we used to be, but those things fluctuate and tbh the idea of a “streak” can be its own gamified motivation, and sometimes when I’m trying to give myself a pep talk that I’m more capable than I give myself credit for that’s what I’ll cite, on my own for-internal-use resume.

Anyway you were probably hoping for some IRL inflation tips which I’m not qualified to give. (I could ask ChatGPT, but so could you, and I definitely wouldn’t want to say anything about the medical advisability of anything it suggested! Funny one to imagine using the grandma exploit on though lol.) But maybe my followers can help – any takers?}}

I do think the one defensible motivation for regulating porn (beyond the obvious workplace safety and consent issues) is the porn-as-superstimulus hypothesis, but the issue is, as you note, it’s no more a superstimulus than, like, most of the consumer entertainment economy these days, so for consistency’s sake you’d have to crack down on most everything. And maybe that’s a bullet people are willing to bite, but what doesn’t make sense is singling out porn as a unique category of evil.

I will say that the expansion of gambling (esp. sports gambling and mobile gacha) recently has been much more of a mess than I possibly-naively assumed it would be, and I have moved in the direction of being more willing to take a hard line against superstimuli than I was a couple years ago. But with pornography I don’t see any plausible regulation mechanism that doesn’t burn down a bunch of licit creative expression, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

I wrote this in tag register but it turned out *way* too long to fit in the tags, so here we go:

#I’ve been thinking about this kind of thing lately

#how in a lot of ways I’ve so far gotten off lightly

#(…so to speak)

#by‚ like‚ running the brain equivalent of Solaris

#approximately nobody bothers to write malware specifically targeted at me

#occasionally I encounter stuff broad-spectrum enough to hit me

#–I generally have to avoid letting potato chips into the house–

#but there’s so much that just whooshes right by

#(also…a while back a mobile-game company attempted to bribe me to try their freemium casino)

#(I did try it‚ because I could really do with the bribe money and I knew I could refrain from microtransactions)

#(and wow it is *incredibly* fucking disturbing just how optimised for addictiveness that fucking thing is)

#(like‚ I could feel myself having a memetic immune response to it)

#(“playing” that “game” was miserable‚ in the way that a fever is miserable)

#((let’s see who burns first, motherfucker))

#(on day 2 I bailed on the agreement)

#(they’d offered me sixty honest-to-God actual Canadian dollars)

#(–bear in mind that for sufficiently easy work‚ the wage at which I am ambivalent about whether to take a gig is about $1.50 an hour–)

#(and *that was not enough to be worth further exposure to that Hell*)

#((I am torn on whether to read Addiction by Design or whether it would just fill me with despair))

#“we’ll increasingly be defined by what we say no to‚” I recently read in a post from 2010

#( http://www.paulgraham.com/addiction.html )

#((“the last thing I want is for the Internet to follow me out into the world‚” he also said‚ on why he didn’t own a smartphone))

#((which on the one hand sure is a thing I have heard a lot of horror stories about))

#((and on the other hand smartphones are not in fact a package deal))

#((months after I wrote it‚ I still occasionally have people come up to me and thank me for my post on offline-first smartphone setups))

#(((we had a lovely chat about Graphene)))

#anyway‚ as I was saying a few months ago

#as the process of optimisation becomes increasingly automated‚ it becomes possible to efficiently target smaller and smaller niches

#I live in a world in which the main limiting factor on how many works of pornography I can read is how many *exist*

#and in which the process of exploration is inherently aversive because statistically almost all attempts dredge up only bad works

#and all but one attempt‚ ever‚ has dredged up at most okay works

#a machine-learning upvote algorithm simply wouldn’t have enough to work with

#it’s a very different world from the one Oligo lives in

#I’m not adapted to his world

#(I mean nobody really is‚ that’s the point‚ but me less than most)

#kind of scared of the prospect of joining him there

#(I suppose I do have the advantage of an estrogen-dominant hormonal profile)

#((I’m ovulating as I write this and I have been feeling so much pity for people who are *stuck* being fertile *all of the time*‚ holy shit))

#(…but pornography‚ the actual well-done stuff‚ *itself* heightens the libido)

#(like for *days* afterward)

#(I really did not expect how affecting it would be on that front)

#((although I guess maybe I should have; maybe it’s not actually so different from general lingering effects of fiction?))

#((…mind you‚ there were a bunch of complaints when access to novels first became widespread that boiled down to “they’re superstimuli’‘‚ weren’t there))

#(like on the one hand it’s good‚ if I *want* a higher libido‚ to have options less invasive and with fewer side effects than sleep deprivation)

#(but it was also a little unnerving and seems like it might have the potential for a vicious cycle)

#((…although in fairness it turns out that the feeling of looking at a notification email for a new porn chapter is *very different* from the feeling of looking at a bag of potato chips in my cupboard))

#((something to look forward to for later‚ rather than something tempting in the moment))

#((so that seems hopeful))


Tags:

#reply via reblog #tag rambles #sexuality and lack thereof #people who can distinguish between their drive for sleep and drive for sex fascinate me #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #disappointed permanent resident of The Future #nsfw text #drugs cw? #gambling


{{next post in sequence}}

itsbenedict:

b902acd919b5b9c63c3c476394b58b47355e0f1c
8e2854bbc7108b0d61b44f8c6ac83642bd8f44cc
fa8edd51c4117eb9153d32ffc2cf095507723b42
f4a91ea861129036d7f0ef56138d65e8d17abe36
e1fcb253cb1e842c0d3a2bfd3e16dafd86da64db

Tags:

#Almost Nowhere #reactionblogging #out of context quotes #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #murder cw? #(I have now returned to Tumblr after leaving for eight days to avoid Almost Nowhere spoilers) #(I do expect to catch up; I’ve already made it up to the afternoon of July 8th)

marauders4evr:

It occurs to me that there are people who weren’t on this website in 2012 and therefore never saw the magical gif that you can actually hear:

693e4e2a5ca9d10f8ab3223002b2f9302c4feb98

It’s been over five years and that still impresses the hell out of me.

galwaygremlin:

wdym you can hear it?

superpaperclip:

Basically, it’s a form of synesthesia, movement-hearing. In this case, you expect to hear a thud, so you do. It’s estimated that 20% of people experience this type of synesthesia, as opposed to 2-4% for other kinds.

eat-the-door-to-the-v0id:

YO what the FUXK

burntcopper:

The longer you watch it the more you get convinced that you can hear a  distant thud and the air displace.

lasrina:

I heard the thud. I closed my eyes and the thud stopped. I opened my eyes and I heard the thud. My goodness but human brains are a mess.

macleod:

This was easily the first ever viral post on Tumblr back in 2011/12. Perhaps even before the great “what your leg feels like after falling asleep” followed by a picture of a static teevee channel.

macleod:

Why is my username dead on this post? I’m still here.

poguniversity:

Sometimes i can still hear his voice

btc-official:

yeah that’s the synesthesia

maryellencarter:

wait, people *actually* hear it? that wasn’t some kind of tumblr exaggeration?


Tags:

#I don’t literally hear the gif but I love the ”yeah that’s the synesthesia” punchline #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once