









Tags:
#dinosaurs #Jurassic Park #fanfic #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #death tw #politics mention #illness mention #covid19










Tags:
#dinosaurs #Jurassic Park #fanfic #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #death tw #politics mention #illness mention #covid19
im gonna make garlic meringues
or you could reconsider?
no like legit!! I could totally just, skip the sugar, add a little salt and some raw garlic/garlic powder, set that shit to 225 and bake for 75 minutes. I honestly don’t see why this wouldn’t work
shit man I could do all KINDS of flavors. Italian sausage. Rosemary. Salt. Add food coloring to differentiate what’s what. im SO doing this later
Savory meringue? I’m going to need follow up on this. I’m guessing it will be like fleeting croutons but enquiring minds
everyone give me flavor ideas. this is gonna be just like that time I tried to use drink mix in meringues but worse <3
as it turns out, salt breaks down egg whites. the only ones that worked were the garlic ones and they tasted like garlic dirt so I tossed them. do not try this
Thank you for the sad but important update. Now we know why these don’t already exist. My last savory experiment proved that garlic ice cream hasn’t gone mainstream because it tastes like frozen Alfredo sauce, so you can file that under time saved
…. This exchange is magical
Tags:
#food #the more you know
Concept: a D&D campaign where the players start out by creating high-level characters and jump straight into a final boss fight with an evil chronomancer. Whether they win or lose, they’re just barely too late to prevent an apocalyptic ritual that unravels the timestream.
Once the prologue is complete, they level their characters down by one level and play out the adventure immediately preceding the fatal confrontation. The next session, they level down again and play out the adventure before that, and so forth, with each adventure successively further back. No separation between player and character knowledge is enforced, effectively affording the player characters knowledge of future events (i.e., the “previous” adventures they’ve already played); exploiting this knowledge is encouraged.
Armed this this information, the player characters are able to make changes to history. They can’t prevent their final confrontation with the chronomancer without causing all sorts of nasty paradoxes, but due to the vortex of Time Fuckery™ surrounding it, the battle itself is exempt – i.e., they’re allowed change history in ways that give themselves advantages in the fight. Changes “close” to the event (i.e., only a couple of sessions in) confer only modest advantages, while changes further back in history (i.e., many sessions into the campaign) are more influential.
Every adventure ends with a flash-forward to the final battle with circumstances revised to reflect whatever changes to history the player characters just made. The campaign ends when they successfully prevent the chronomancer from blowing up the space-time continuum, thereby locking in the new timeline.
(If they manage to get all the way to level one without stopping the chronomancer, their “first” adventure has them bumping into a random NPC who they now realise is a low level, not-yet-evil version of that same chronomancer. The same no-preventing-the-final-battle rule applies, so they can’t just kill the poor schmuck, but now they’ve got an opportunity to really throw a wrench into the works!)
Every single D&D party I think I’ve ever been in would adopt him into the party.
Every single one.
You can absolutely do that, if you end up getting that far, but the Power of Friendship isn’t exempt from the no-preventing-the-final-battle rule, so all befriending the chronomancer’s past self gets you is an Anakin-versus-Obi-Wan “how could you do this, we were friends!” moment in the final battle.
(Of course, you could totally exploit that for tactical advantage, if you were bastardly enough!)
Tags:
#time travel #story ideas I will never write #D&D
The NYT Opinion page goes on and on about Intellectual Diversity, yet they only ever have smug liberals, Enlightened Centrists, and #NeverTrump Catholic Republicans.
Given that the NYT’s high water mark of intellectual diversity was when it published the Unabomber Manifesto, I propose this lineup for their Opinion section:
One anarcho-primitivist;
One Christian Dominionist;
One jaded Singaporean technocrat;
One incel;
One TikTok Witch;
One editor each from the People’s Daily and the Epoch Times;
One monarchist;
One normie (control group).
Tags:
#politics cw #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #(”one editor each from the People’s Daily and the Epoch Times”) #((the Epoch Times keeps trying to convince us to subscribe and we are kind of weirded out tbh))