chroniclesofrettek:

michaelblume:

My new favorite thing is people outside the Hamilton fandom watching in alarm as their friends get sucked in, knowing they’ll probably be next, powerless to stop the inevitable. It’s adorable.

It’s like watching your friends move to the bay area.


Tags:

#Hamilton #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #I’m kind of curious to see how long I can hold out #probably indefinitely considering I still haven’t seen The Avengers #(hell I haven’t seen *Star Wars*) #cultural osmosis will take you far

SCC Prompt Set #166

diaryofasnowflake:

What are some advantages of BDSM and D/s fiction?

You can get dark.  In real life BDSM, we play with the idea of non-consensual relationships, or completely one-sided ones, but we all know that at the end of the day, you’re talking about two people consensually exchanging power and caring for one another.  That’s the way it should be, but when you’re just reading to get off, you can make it really twisted without the same moral problems.

Also, I’m a mind control fetishist, so fiction allows for some fantasy scenarios that simply could not happen in real life.  

What are the risks?

Getting confused as heck.  When I was 14 and found hypnokinky erotica for the first time, I assumed that the fact that I was turned on by these fantasies meant that I wanted them in real life, even though I knew them to be abhorrent.  Plus, these websites often had disclaimers, saying that these were fantasies only and that acting on them meant you were sick.  I didn’t know that they were referring really to the non-consensual aspects, and that there was a way to satisfy these urges without running off a moral cliff.

So when fiction becomes predominant, and there aren’t counter-messages of what consensual BDSM looks like, it can be a real humdinger to work through it all.

These days, I actually bristle at so-called consensual BDSM porn.  First of all, it doesn’t do much for me; I get all that in real life.  Second of all, it comes off as moralizing, and that’s incongruous with writing that’s supposed to get people off.  Third of all, then you get the likes of 50 Shades of Grey.  The reason I hate that series is twofold: 1) It presents a creepy, messed-up relationship as consensual BDSM, making all its mistakes and insinuations about what it means to be kinky all the more messed up.  2) It has become a cultural reference point to refer to kink, and that shit IS NOT ME.

TL;DR: Kinky fiction is fun, but you have to learn the skills to separate reality from fantasy from BDSM play through other means, and misinformation or confusion can spread in the meantime.

I wonder how much of it coming off as moralizing is because of you not being into it? I’m having trouble thinking of moralizing examples, but then my reaction when I first discovered consensual hypno-kink erotica was “oh my god, where have you been all my life”. It’s very possible that the only reason I’m not rolling my eyes at stories trying to get all their ethical ducks in a row is because I happen to genuinely prefer ethical situations in my porn, right down to my id, and so I feel kindly disposed towards it.

(Or possibly I just haven’t read any of the really moralizing ones, especially since I still don’t have a better means of obtaining porn that at least sort of fits my tastes than “wander through seas of non-con and occasionally hit one by blind luck” (or the indirect word-of-mouth version, “wander through seas of recs for non-con and occasionally hit a rec by blind luck”).)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #sexuality and lack thereof #nsfw? #adventures in ‘close but not quite’


{{next post in sequence}}

sigmaleph:

Genius.

[text over an image of a boy and a wolf, the text says: “Never confuse Type I and Type II errors again. Just remember that the Boy Who Cried Wolf caused both Type I & II errors, in that order. First everyone believed there was a wolf, when there wasn’t. Next they believed there was no wolf, when there was. Substitute “effect” for “wolf” and you’re done. Kudos to @danolner for the thought. Illustration by Francis Barlow “De pastoris puero et agricolis” (1687). Public Domain. Via wikimedia.org”]


Tags:

#the more you know

snippets from KUEC archives

justice-turtle:

(Some prepackaged food is using the advertising slogan “Forge Dinner”, presumably to indicate that it is for Manly Men or something. *tries not to hum “men in tiiiiiights”* Ursula goes on a rant about how she has actually forged metal, it’s hard fucking work, this slogan is illogical, etc.)

Ursula, on a roll: “If you were going toe to toe with an Immortal, would you want to be armed with a Velveeta Cheesy Skillet Meal?!”

Kevin: “Yes, but I’ll get into why in a minute.”

And for some reason I had to stop and laugh for like three solid minutes. I don’t know why. I got plenty of sleep, but I’m cackling and wheezing like I’m sleep-deprived. I just… the mental image… *still giggling*


Tags:

#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #Kevin and Ursula Eat Cheap

ilzolende:

shitifindon:

michaelblume:

So it looks like we’re stuck on this broken site for a while, but could we try to avoid its most broken features? Chat posts and quote posts are really really hard to respond to. And they’re unnecessary. You can basically always put the same content in a text post. Text posts can easily start reblog chains where you can see clearly who said what. Thank you.

(Like I know we’re going to reblog other people’s quote/chat posts sometimes, I’m just saying when we’re making posts from scratch, let’s just use text posts)

Reminder that I have quote posts blocked so I don’t see them unless somebody pings me, and I periodically consider doing the same thing with chat posts, precisely because they’re so damn inconvenient to respond to and I don’t want to be tempted.

I agree.

(I do this naturally, because I post from Diaspora*, which doesn’t offer chat or quote posts.)


Tags:

#pretty much #Tumblr: a User’s Guide

{{previous post in sequence}}


justice-turtle:

brin-bellway:

justice-turtle:

So the Rockbreaker’s Ceremony pre-festival push and raffle is starting up this Sunday, aaand I may have just volunteered as a dragon acceptor.

Eh, I was planning to spend the week in coli anyway. I’ll just be getting my fodder through CRs instead of from the AH. :D I’ll have to practice taking care of myself and being willing to knock off work at reasonable hours even if nobody else is online to take over, though… that should be interesting. ;P

(So, y’know, if you were planning to participate in the Rockbreaker’s raffle, consider throwing dragons at me starting Sunday… ^_^)

I was actually leaning towards not participating in the dom raffle (well, the dragon part; if they have daily trivia I’ll do that), because I defected during the last Lightning profit push and felt bad about it even though I had official permission (they said that since it was “about profit, not placement”, it was okay to exploit Nature’s ridiculous payouts instead of exalting ourselves). We got second place that week because of the efforts of people who ignored or didn’t hear that permission, and I felt like I was parasitising them. Lightning is going for bolstering next week, and I intend to Do My Part.

Perhaps I’ll send you one dragon for luck. I’ve heard OOF raffle accepting can get a bit overwhelming, so yes, please do take care of yourself.

*nodnod* I definitely get that. (One reason I switched to Earth, actually; in bigger flights I feel like such deadweight if I’m not exalting practically 24/7 any week we push.) Have fun, and I hope you do get bolstering! Are y’all pushing against anyone for second, do you know yet?

I haven’t heard anything about others. We’ll see.


Tags:

#Flight Rising #reply via reblog

plain-dealing-villain asked: Even if you aren’t going to deliver it, please compose the arguments for at least one of the crazy Constitutional things and share it with us.

comparativelysuperlative:

  • If you’ll permit me to head the Committee on Detail, I bet I could sneak some coded messages into the text. You know you want to.

Our predecessors kept things a bit ambiguous as to how much weight we ought to give to their opinions on the floor. Filing a lot of the records of the debates away in the warehouse where they keep the Ark of the Covenant, Madison keeping his notes secret and then published them after everyone involved was dead, that sort of thing. Since you’ve already shot down my suggestion about requiring courts to interpret everything by the literal text which is written entirely in Lojban, I have an alternate proposal.

I know most of you take a dimmer view of sticking to original intent than I do. And I was expecting you to change that opinion now it’s your intent that’s in question, but congrats on your consistency I guess. Now. This is going to be an ongoing debate in the coming centuries. People looking back at the opinions of anyone who was in this room where it happened and using our opinions as proof of what we Really Meant. (Yes, that’s going to include me. The guy who just gave a six-hour speech about electing an aristocracy.)

But.

What if we made it completely impossible for anyone to say “the Founding Parents intended to put [X] in the document; therefore it must be the meaning of the law”? No one, and I mean no one, taking that seriously ever again. I can give you that.

Imagine: some future scholar, poring over the text because she’s in eighth-grade social studies and might get called on soon. And she notices that if you take the first word of the Preamble, the second word of the first clause, and so forth, it spells out a 419 scam. Or it says that da Vinci shot Kennedy, or gives ambiguous directions to a nonexistent buried treasure, whatever you like. I’m open to suggestions. In any case, your least favorite mode of interpretation will be dead

Plus, hidden messages are cool.

You know you want to.


Tags:

#home of the brave #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog