Star Trek: Deep Space 9
Tags:
#Star Trek #DS9 #never change Garak
My new favorite thing is people outside the Hamilton fandom watching in alarm as their friends get sucked in, knowing they’ll probably be next, powerless to stop the inevitable. It’s adorable.
It’s like watching your friends move to the bay area.
Tags:
#Hamilton #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #I’m kind of curious to see how long I can hold out #probably indefinitely considering I still haven’t seen The Avengers #(hell I haven’t seen *Star Wars*) #cultural osmosis will take you far
{{Title link: http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/11/16/hardball-questions-for-the-next-debate/ }}
I won’t spoil any punchlines for this. Check it out.
Tags:
#home of the brave #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog

[text over an image of a boy and a wolf, the text says: “Never confuse Type I and Type II errors again. Just remember that the Boy Who Cried Wolf caused both Type I & II errors, in that order. First everyone believed there was a wolf, when there wasn’t. Next they believed there was no wolf, when there was. Substitute “effect” for “wolf” and you’re done. Kudos to @danolner for the thought. Illustration by Francis Barlow “De pastoris puero et agricolis” (1687). Public Domain. Via wikimedia.org”]
Tags:
#the more you know
(Some prepackaged food is using the advertising slogan “Forge Dinner”, presumably to indicate that it is for Manly Men or something. *tries not to hum “men in tiiiiiights”* Ursula goes on a rant about how she has actually forged metal, it’s hard fucking work, this slogan is illogical, etc.)
Ursula, on a roll: “If you were going toe to toe with an Immortal, would you want to be armed with a Velveeta Cheesy Skillet Meal?!”
Kevin: “Yes, but I’ll get into why in a minute.”
And for some reason I had to stop and laugh for like three solid minutes. I don’t know why. I got plenty of sleep, but I’m cackling and wheezing like I’m sleep-deprived. I just… the mental image… *still giggling*
Tags:
#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #Kevin and Ursula Eat Cheap
WHO LET THESE GUYS GET THEIR HANDS ON A TIME MACHINE
Scotty takes a lackadaisical approach to the temporal prime directive
Tags:
#Star Trek #TOS #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #facial expressions
So it looks like we’re stuck on this broken site for a while, but could we try to avoid its most broken features? Chat posts and quote posts are really really hard to respond to. And they’re unnecessary. You can basically always put the same content in a text post. Text posts can easily start reblog chains where you can see clearly who said what. Thank you.
(Like I know we’re going to reblog other people’s quote/chat posts sometimes, I’m just saying when we’re making posts from scratch, let’s just use text posts)
Reminder that I have quote posts blocked so I don’t see them unless somebody pings me, and I periodically consider doing the same thing with chat posts, precisely because they’re so damn inconvenient to respond to and I don’t want to be tempted.
I agree.
(I do this naturally, because I post from Diaspora*, which doesn’t offer chat or quote posts.)
Tags:
#pretty much #Tumblr: a User’s Guide
- If you’ll permit me to head the Committee on Detail, I bet I could sneak some coded messages into the text. You know you want to.
Our predecessors kept things a bit ambiguous as to how much weight we ought to give to their opinions on the floor. Filing a lot of the records of the debates away in the warehouse where they keep the Ark of the Covenant, Madison keeping his notes secret and then published them after everyone involved was dead, that sort of thing. Since you’ve already shot down my suggestion about requiring courts to interpret everything by the literal text which is written entirely in Lojban, I have an alternate proposal.
I know most of you take a dimmer view of sticking to original intent than I do. And I was expecting you to change that opinion now it’s your intent that’s in question, but congrats on your consistency I guess. Now. This is going to be an ongoing debate in the coming centuries. People looking back at the opinions of anyone who was in this room where it happened and using our opinions as proof of what we Really Meant. (Yes, that’s going to include me. The guy who just gave a six-hour speech about electing an aristocracy.)
But.
What if we made it completely impossible for anyone to say “the Founding Parents intended to put [X] in the document; therefore it must be the meaning of the law”? No one, and I mean no one, taking that seriously ever again. I can give you that.
Imagine: some future scholar, poring over the text because she’s in eighth-grade social studies and might get called on soon. And she notices that if you take the first word of the Preamble, the second word of the first clause, and so forth, it spells out a 419 scam. Or it says that da Vinci shot Kennedy, or gives ambiguous directions to a nonexistent buried treasure, whatever you like. I’m open to suggestions. In any case, your least favorite mode of interpretation will be dead.
Plus, hidden messages are cool.
You know you want to.
Tags:
#home of the brave #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog