max1461:

headspace-hotel:

headspace-hotel:

As much fun as you can have looking at obscure and weird Wikipedia pages, what’s really fun about Wikipedia is looking at the pages for completely mundane, everyday things.

There’s something amusing about having a concept explained to you that is so familiar it would never occur to you to look it up, but it’s also fascinating because even though you use a towel every day, you really do not know anything about towels. I could not tell you the history of towels or the types of towels or even come up with an accurate and exhaustive definition of “towel” twenty minutes ago. Almost everything, including things that are part of every day of our lives, is mostly unknown to us.

I feel like this is a form of art. The objective tone and factuality of Wikipedia should be what separates it from the “artistic,” but this kind of systematic definition, description, exploration and exemplification…

…when applied to something like a “hug,” it’s…something else. I am being shown the world and the nature of humans, and it’s beautiful.

The Wikipedia article for Humans is really something else. It’s just back to back sentences that sound like they could have been written by an alien and sentences that could definitely only have been written by us.


Tags:

#Wikipedia #the wondrous variety of sapient life #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what

ohmygod internet what

anshinwrites:

inflateablefilth:

justaguywitharrows:

abcooper:

The alt text of this xkcd comic is:

wikipedia trivia: if you take any article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat, you will eventually end up at philosophy

Evan and I decided to test this.

Star Trek: 12 clicks

My Little Pony: 18 clicks

kettle: 15 clicks

Sapphire & Steel: 16 clicks

beer: 13 clicks

South Africa: 14 clicks

…. this would probably be less mindblowingly hilarious if it weren’t 4:30 in the morning, right?

YOU GUYS

No it is totally as mind-blowing as it sounds

which is to say VERY

This is my new version of the airport game. Best thing ever!

I actually managed to break this one time.  I ended up on an article (I wanna say it was the one on aqueducts, but I don’t recall precisely?) where the first link went to another page and the first link on that page took me back to the previous one.  So I basically ended up in a loop.

That wasn’t about philosophy.

But I haven’t found any other pages that this’ll happen on yet. 

If the link takes you partway down the page, is it the first link from there or the first link from the top of the page? Because if it’s from there, I found a three-part loop first try: Solids –> States of matter#The three classical states –> Bonding of solids –> Solids.

Otherwise it’s 14. (From Hurricane John (2006), the page of the day.)


Tags:

#Wikipedia #reply via reblog