theonlycabbage:

nitewrighter:

moonachilles:

Jane Austen really said ‘I respect the “I can fix him” movement but that’s just not me. He’ll fix himself if knows what’s good for him’ and that’s why her works are still calling the shots today.

Meanwhile Emily Brönte just said “We can make each other worse.”

Mary Shelley said, “I can make him


Tags:

#I didn’t actually laugh aloud but it still amused me enough to reblog #Frankenstein #this post was queued because my to-reblog list is too long and I didn’t want to dump it on you all at once

comparativelysuperlative:

kelsbraintumbler:

brozilek:

brozilek:

OK but like, “Frankenstein’s Monster”, a being capable of thought and speech, refers to Victor Frankenstein as his father. So why wouldn’t it be ok to call him Frankenstein, seeing as it’s his dad’s last name??? Do we have to make up a first name for him, just to differentiate between them?

Dwight Frankenstein

if Victor had continued to like him after he brought him to life, he probably would have named him Adam? Victor’s religious thing was not exactly subtle.

He would have, but Dwight doesn’t like that name. “I am thy creature: I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel.” So I think we should respect his preferences and call him Satan.


Tags:

#Frankenstein #a conversation I’m pretty sure I’ve had at least once: #”*something about Frankenstein [the monster]*” #”Frankenstein was the *creator* not the monster!” #”Okay fine Frankenstein *Junior*”