nonomella:

Coraline is a masterfully made film, an amazing piece of art that i would never ever ever show to a child oh my god are you kidding me

 

cthullhu:

Nothing wrong with a good dose of sheer terror at a young age

 

whatthecurtains:

“It was a story, I learned when people began to read it, that children experienced as an adventure, but which gave adults nightmares. It’s the strangest book I’ve written”

-Neil Gaiman on Coraline

 

greenbryn:

@nightlovechild

 

lierdumoa:

This is a legit psychology phenomenon tho like there’s a stop motion version of Alice and Wonderland that adults find viscerally horrifying, but children think is nbd. It’s like in that ‘toy story’ period of development kids are all kind of high key convinced that their stuffed animals lead secret lives when they’re not looking and that they’re sleeping on top of a child-eating monster every night so they see a movie like Coraline and are just like “Ah, yes. A validation of my normal everyday worldview. Same thing happened to me last Tuesday night. I told mommy and she just smiled and nodded.”

 

redgrieve:

Stephen King had this whole spiel i found really interesting about this phenomenon about how kids have like their own culture and their own literally a different way of viewing and interpreting the world with its own rules that’s like secret and removed from adult culture and that you just kinda forget ever existed as you grow up it’s apparently why he writes about kids so much

 

12drakon:

An open-ended puzzle often gives parents math anxiety while their kids just happily play with it, explore, and learn. I’ve seen it so many times in math circles. We warn folks about it.

 

gokuma:

Neil Gaiman also said that the difference in reactions stems from the fact in “Coraline” adults see a child in danger – while children see themselves facing danger and winning

 

rosymamacita:

i never saw so much push back from adults towards YA literature as when middle aged women started reading The Hunger Games. They were horrified that kids would be given such harsh stories, and I kept trying to point out the NECESSITY of confronting these hard issues in a safe fictional environment.

 

jewishdragon:

Also, in an interview, he said that Coraline was partially based on a story his not yet 6 year old daughter would tell him 

SAGAL: No. I mean, for example, your incredibly successful young adult novel “Coraline” is about a young girl in house in which there’s a hole in the wall that leads to a very mysterious and very evil world. So when you were a kid, is that what you imagined?

GAIMAN: When I was a kid, we actually lived in a house that had been divided in two at one point, which meant that one room in our house opened up onto a brick wall. And I was convinced all I had to do was just open it the right way and it wouldn’t be a brick wall. So I’d sidle over to the door and I’d pull it open.

(SOUNDBITE OF LAUGHTER)

SAGAL: Right.

GAIMAN: And it was always a brick wall.

SAGAL: Right.

GAIMAN: But it was one of those things that as I grew older, I carried it with me and I thought, I want to send somebody through that door. And when I came to write a story for my daughter Holly, at the time she was a 4 or 5-year-old girl. She’d come home from nursery. She’d seen me writing all day. So she’d come and climb on my lap and dictate stories to me. And it’d always be about small girls named Holly.

SAGAL: Right.

GAIMAN: Who would come home to normally find their mother had been kidnapped by a witch and replaced by evil people who wanted to kill her and she’d have to go off and escape. And I thought, great, what a fun kid.

 

somewhereinmalta:

It’s anxious adults who desperately want to “soften” stories. Kids prefer the real thing: with monsters, bloodthirsty ogres and evil murderous stepmothers; where the littlest brother always wins and all the villains are horrendously punished in the end. The world is threatening to the eyes of a child, so they need a fictional universe where the little people have a fair chance against the big and strong.

 

maryellencarter:

Sometimes. Other times you have small anxious children who really, really don’t want anything upsetting or traumatic in their stories. Those do exist; I was one. The whole thing about “children don’t want soft stories, children want gore and horror and decapitated barbies” may apply to a majority of children, but not all of them. :P

#i also went hoppity-skip of my own volition   #i am not and was not a Real Child   #still kind of sensitive about that   #i was easily frightened and easily traumatized   #and the only people who seem to acknowledge that possibility at all   #are like Think Of The Children conservative activists and helicopter parents   #idk if i have a point here   #i just get a little tetchy about Real Children

Oh god, same.

The person right before you in the chain says “The world is threatening to the eyes of a child, so they need a fictional universe where the little people have a fair chance against the big and strong”, and while there’s a important harm *reduction* in that, also very important is “so they need a universe where things *aren’t* threatening for a change”.

This world is one *so* thoroughly threatening that even its *sitcoms* contain shapeshifting monsters that camouflage themselves as normal parts of the environment, and plagues that drive you insane and which can infect you through a phone call. A world where cars have stickers constantly reminding you of the terrible things that can happen to you in them, and every grocery store has a random chance of triggering you, re-rolled every four minutes (and you don’t have enough autonomy to even *attempt* to do anything to counteract it).

Why the fuck *wouldn’t* you want a break from that hellscape?

I did read Coraline as a kid, and I don’t think I found it *especially* horrifying, but “not especially horrifying” is *not* *saying* much at that age.

(I continue to be very glad that I did not read Animorphs.)

(Although, re: decapitated Barbies specifically, I *did* play barber-surgeon† with my stuffed animals. This somehow did not stop me from being what I think was the expected level of horrified by those bits of Toy Story; it wasn’t until I was an adult that I realised I was Sid.)

There’s *some* ways in which I rolled with it more as a kid (for example, my inclination towards fluff is actually *stronger* now), but I think that’s…sort of a learned-helplessness kind of thing? When horror is everywhere, there’s nothing you can do *but* take it.

(related: the thing where younger!me was into (what I would now recognise as) erotic horror because *that was all there was*; my tastes shifted heavily towards fluffy consentful stuff pretty much as soon as there was fluffy consentful stuff to be had)

I wonder if this relates to the assumption between adults that everyone’s masochistic.

†I don’t think I ever actually called it that, but I figure that term gives you a good idea of the sort of things involved.


Tags:

#the last time I walked into a grocery store and they started playing That Song #I walked right back out and listened to Florence and the Machine on my smartphone while I waited for them to be done #(and it *still* sucked just not as much) #ten-year-old me did not have that option #reply via reblog #long post #amnesia cw #ageism #nsfw text? #death mention #illness mention #my childhood

Anonymous asked: Should only people with children be allowed to vote, since they are the only ones with a stake in the future?

ilzolende:

ozymandias271:

only people with children have a stake in the future

no one without children has younger friends, a desire for their works to be remembered in the future, or empathy for future humans

this seems very plausible

I am a child and I have a major stake in the future, and when I am 18 I will also expect to be personally affected by the state of my country 60 years from now.

Ban all elderly (65+?) people from voting, as they won’t be around to face the long-term consequences of their decisions? This is equally (read: not very) reasonable. People have actually proposed doing stuff like “make smoking illegal for all people born in [current year] – 17 or later” or “let adults vote on whether all people graduating high school should be ‘drafted’ to do menial tasks like elder care and washing military laundry and whatnot for low pay”, because they would never be negatively impacted by those proposals.

People with children, when voting on policy that only affects young people, can be incredibly patronizing and self-interested. (“I want the government to spy on my kids for me!” “I want my kids to go to jail if they ditch class too much!” “I don’t want my kids to ever be allowed to do things I disapprove of, even when they’re adults!”)

I don’t want to live in the future people approve of for their children to live in, I want to live in the future that its residents want. Read proposals for utopias and you’ll soon see that approval uncoupled from actual desires leads to a society you wouldn’t want to live in.


Tags:

#yes this #I mostly see this with global warming #’we must Do Something to make 2050 a good place for our children to live!’ #dude I don’t give a fuck about my nonexistent children #I want to make 2050 a good place for my *future selves* to live #you don’t *need* and in fact shouldn’t *try* to rely on selflessness to get me to care about the future #self-interest will get the job done nicely #I’m going to tag this #death tw #under my policy of ‘tag death warnings on things that would have triggered my seven-year-old self’

What We Talk About When We Talk About YA

thatlauraruby:

Hello!  My name is Kerri Miller Christopher Beha AO Scott Ruth Graham Nathaniel Hawthorne Socrates Bob and I’m here to tell you that we’re all going to hell.  HELL. Why, you ask?  Well, let me expound upon it in a million-word screed that I will make as condescending as possible: because you’re reading and watching things I think are stupid.

Did you know your behavior signifies a decline in greater civilization?  You should. No, it doesn’t matter that I’ve never read the stupid things you’re reading.  I am the last adult in America. 

I see you and your secret, childish acronyms. YA? MG? TFIOS? I had look up this stuff on the World Wide Web and I’m still confused. I’m a person of a certain age and I’ve been left out of the cultural conversation.  My feelings about this should mean more than they actually do. 

I know this will upset people, but I don’t understand why anyone over the age of six is reading books for children.  When I was in kindergarten, my favorite book was OLD MAN AND THE SEA. Old men are grown-ups, and that’s what I wanted to be: an old man wrestling with a fish. Also, reading it was horrible, and no one who is a grown-up ever reads for pleasure, because reading for pleasure is stupid. Just ask all those guys reading Dean Koontz and Lee Child. They’re in it for the metaphors.

Fellow grown-ups, at the risk of sounding snobbish and joyless and old, well, look, I am all those things but you should hear me out anyway, because I have opinions. LISTEN. It’s time to center the cultural conversation back where it belongs: on me. All YA is silly, sentimental and simple and I know this because mostly ladies write it and no one should make that much money from books about a vampire. 

All of you are YouTubing right now, aren’t you?  You’re totally YouTubing.  Stop that.   

This is what I’m trying to say: I’m concerned for you. I say these things out of love, not a love for clicks.  I am sad that you are reading YA fiction when you could be reading fiction for adults, because it’s never occurred to me that you can read both.  Actually, I think there’s a law.

Except for the times I am binge-watching Mad Men and waxing nostalgic for a time that never was and a patriarchy that never died, I only read very smart, literary fiction that is complex and important, the kind of smart fiction that YA can never be, because I said so.  Reading this important kind of grown-up fiction cleans out your colon. It puts hair on your chest. It’s like trying to open a locked door using only your head.  It’s supposed to hurt.  It breaks your teeth, knocks you unconscious and leaves cuts and bruises on your face and your body broken, like Hemingway fresh from the war. Don’t you want to be like Hemingway fresh from the war?  Of course you do, because he was an old white man, on the sea, with a fish. These can be your battle scars, too. Wear them proudly. You are a grown-up.


Tags:

#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #get off my lawn #(…I am actually not sure what MG is supposed to mean in this context?) #(sometimes lists of acrynyms have a made-up one at the *end*) #(but this is in the middle)

{{not completely certain that the first and second posters are actually different people}}

hoodsos-aus:

 

magconbabe-matt:

This shit better work

 

sansaspark:

HAH I REBLOGGED THIS LAST NIGHT AND LOOK WHAT I GOT FROM MY DAD TODAY OUT OF THE BLUE

 

hellabitcoins:

what if we all got paper lol

 

tokitoide:

TOO DAMN SUPERSTITIOUS WHEEEEEEE

 

plantmandotexeretired:

Wow…wtf, I hadn’t noticed this month had 5 weekends O3O

 

verilidaine:

(All this requires to happen is a month with 31 days to start on a Friday.  This will happen May 2015, January 2016… and on and on.)

 

justice-turtle:

*backreads post notes* Ooh, thanks for the math, verilidaine. I figured there had to be some kind of “it won’t happen again in August till blah de blah” thing going on, but couldn’t quite figure out the specifics.

I also figured it was specifically August, but even that has a next-occurrence date of merely 2025. (Source: my computer’s calendar function. It has a “move forward one year” button, which I clicked repeatedly until I found an August ending on Sunday. Feel free to find a calendar program with the same button if you want to double-check.)

(I feel a little bad about reblogging this, because I recently saw someone make a blog comment along the lines of “look, this total-bullshit Tumblr post has 20,000 notes, lol stupid teenagers” and reblogging this is providing more fodder for that sort of thing (it wasn’t the first time I’ve seen that type of post, and I doubt it will be the last). I’m trying to tell myself it’s their own fault for basing their ageist insults on a critical misunderstanding of how the note system works. Not sure how much it’s helping.)


Tags:

#reply via reblog #Orientalism #ageism #lying bastards

[tw: ageism, dysphoria, medical oppression]

anshinwrites:

kinspeak:

“How can you know anything about your identity when you’re just a teenager?”

“Actually, I’m 30.”

“You must be really immature, then.”

I tried to reblog it and it vanished. O_o

Anyway, as I was saying.  This argument has completely stopped fazing me, because the way I figure, if I’ve known my own identity for longer than the person telling me I’m wrong has been alive, then I’ve kinda got one up on them.

Still, that doesn’t stop this argument from being harmful, if baseless.  It reeks of ageism and perpetuates the idea that when we all become adults, we magically get this book of knowledge about the world and about ourselves, and we’re not allowed to know anything before then.  Hell, I know adults who still don’t have themselves figured out and kids who know exactly what’s up better than anyone else around them.  There is no magic age at which everyone suddenly has a miraculous epiphany.  It happens at a different age for everyone.

One of these days, I have faith that people will learn this.  And then we can move past ridiculous laws that say teens aren’t allowed to have Plan B or that anyone with a uterus who doesn’t want said uterus can’t get it removed until they’re 25 (or have been sufficiently pressured to have a kid/have had a kid) or that young trans* people aren’t allowed to start transitioning until they’re old enough to be absolutely sure of themselves, even if they’ve had crippling dysphoria since they were three.

Until then, this is one of the biggest problems with society—the fact that everything we do revolves around a magic number that’s supposed to define our maturity and knowledge.

I have read two different blog conversations with adults talking amongst themselves about maturity. The general consensus both times is that they stopped feeling more mature around age fifteen. Not seeing the whole “book of knowledge” thing.

And then we can move past ridiculous laws that say teens aren’t allowed to have Plan B

Wait, what? How is that internally consistent? If we accept for the purposes of argument the inferiority of teenagers, then their access to Plan B should be more important. They’re more likely to not realise “Maybe having sex isn’t such a good idea, all in all” until afterwards.


Tags:

#reply via reblog   #ageism   #anshinwrites