{{previous post in sequence}}


aprilwitching:

has anybody read the ted chiang short story “liking what you see

its interesting sci-fi. i read it/am reading it today!

anyway, the reason im making this post is that the story made me realize i basically have the supposedly fictional condition that the story describes as “calliagnosia”? i think!

i mean, im not face-blind, but ive always known i had some perceptual oddities when it came to faces. the story seems to say that a normal person automatically has some kind of emotional or visceral response to seeing a really “beautiful” (or really “ugly”) face, and also that it is easy for a normal person to tell right away if another person is beautiful or ugly, without having to think about it. 

i dont have that, though! i asked @pipistrellusif it knew what that meant, to respond to human faces that way, if that was, like, a Thing. 

it didnt know, and then we commiserated over the shared experience of, like, trying to join in other peoples talk about cute boy band members or cute actresses or w/e, but not really being able to tell which ones were supposed to becute

pip kind of associated it with asexuality, which makes sense, but im not asexual– i can definitely be physically attracted to people– and i still have this issue

and, yk, i can think someone is interesting or appealing to look at, for sure, but it doesnt really seem to map on to whether they’re…?? like, sometimes people call other people “striking” and i get that! i TOTALLY understand “striking”! when someone is unusual-looking, with a lot of character and presence and visual interest to them. and sometimes im really attracted to that unusualness, that interestingness, right away. but like… “interestingness” for me, when its really attractive, is as likely to involve highly visible scars or crooked teeth as it is to involve big eyes or long, shiny hair or something. and the attraction still isnt really like a “turn on” thing or even a pleasure thing, not initially and not just based on appearance. its more a fascination, like how i feel when i see a really weird-looking, cool giant bug and immediately wanna pick it up or draw it or something. plus, while im not really face-blind, i do have a lot of trouble telling people with similar features apart unless i know them pretty well. (if anything, i think this pulls me awayfrom very conventionally attractive types a little bit, bc they can end up looking super indistinct/bland to me. sometimes i have trouble following the plots of movies if the actors look too similar in that way. its like im watching several copies of the man in the tan jacket– “well– he definitely had hair! and facial features!”)

anyway, i always figured most people look interesting and distinctive somehow when you look at them long enough, so i never really questioned those “everyone is beautiful in their own way!” and “if you have a really great personality, it will eventually shine through your physical appearance and you will look wonderful!” cliches. sure, i thought they were cheesy, and ineffective in actually changing social values/standards of beauty at all, and maybe a little misguided in the sense of why are we so focused on physical “good looks” over other stuff anyway. but i never felt like they were fundamentally untrue? i suppose a lot of people do though ( “well some people just ARE beautiful or ugly!”)

i remember telling someone about one of my many intense teenage crushes once, and i remember she said, after a really long, awkward pause, “well…im glad someone is really into [person]. im glad someone thinks [person] is cute. thats sweet.”

 

ozymandias271:

Ooh I definitely have an instinctive reaction of, like, “pretty face!” and “ugly face!”

It seems pretty uncorrelated to conventional attractiveness though? Like on one hand I go “pretty!” at girls with big breasts and lots of makeup and stuff, but on the other hand I also go “pretty!” at people with really kinky hair, or pudgy bellies, or big noses.

Also one of the biggest things for me seems to be, like, affect? Like there are people who are meh until you see them move or talk or, especially, smile, and then suddenly they are THE PRETTIEST and you want to stare at them ALL THE TIME.

And I *can* be sexually attracted to people who don’t make me go “pretty!” at first; like, I’ve definitely dated people where I can tell that they don’t have any of the traits that make me go “pretty!”, but also I am full of The Feels, and so they are SUPER PRETTY to me anyway.

 

ilzolende:

Liking What You See is also interesting from a youth-rights standpoint (and other standpoints I have), and it might be nice to discuss it that way sometime. In a post that started out being on that subject. I’ll write one later, perhaps, unless someone else writes one first.

 

brin-bellway:

@ ilzo: I’d be interested in that.

As for this conversation:

I’ve been considering the term “grey-aesthetic” regarding my relationship with beauty, and this seems to support that. Like, I can tell when someone (or something, I don’t feel like it’s different with faces vs objects) is pretty, and all else equal I’ll pick a pretty object over an ugly one, but it doesn’t feel…I usually don’t feel a pull towards pretty things, a desire to stare at it longer than I would stare at an aesthetically-neutral thing, a reward of pretty things doesn’t motivate me. I say I usually don’t feel a pull because every so often I do, every once in a while I’ll see a particular pretty thing that I feel an urge to stare at, and to possess if applicable. It’s always fleeting, though: before long (hours, maybe a day or two tops), it fades, and I’m back to “okay, so it’s pretty, so what?”.

(Actually, now that I think about it, sometimes it’s longer than a couple days with people; once it was a couple months, but that was someone I didn’t see very much. Perhaps the difference isn’t people vs objects, but rather level of access: a certain (fairly small) amount of time spent looking at the thing, however long it takes to get that much time in.)

(Also, on an unrelated note, this is the third Ted Chiang story I’ve been linked to (the others were “Hell Is the Absence of God” (broken link) and “Seventy-Two Letters”), and I liked all of them. Perhaps I should seek out more of Chiang’s work.)

 

justice-turtle:

*growls* I wrote a long thinky reblog about this and didn’t think to screenshot it, and tumblr mobile ate it… :P

(short version: I kinda remember having something like this as a teen but I’m not too sure I wasn’t just hella gay. Also long complicated questioning of possibly constructed sexuality with weird ties to childhood abuse factors.)

 

brin-bellway:

I was going to say “you really need an automatic text-backup add-on”, but then I looked and apparently add-ons have to be specifically made for mobile browsers, and a lot of the PC add-ons don’t have a mobile port. I couldn’t find any relevant add-ons on Android Firefox, so whatever you’re using might not have one either.

(Are you sure it’s not, like, hiding in your drafts folder or something?)

 

justice-turtle:

*pokes drafts just to be sure* Yeah, not there.

I use a text-backup addon for my laptop browsers, but yeah, I suspect finding a reliable one for iPhone (that works in the Tumblr app) is gonna be a long hunt. Haven’t been arsed to start that one yet. :P


Tags:

#(October 2015) #(AFAIK there is still no good way to do this on iOS) #conversational aglets #Brin owns *two* 2010’s computers now #long post

rationalists-out-of-context:

So you’re telling me, all those years in which I’d be in a car desperate for the bathroom and they wouldn’t pull over, and I’d be frantically coming up with the dirtiest fantasies I could imagine, leaning against the window thinking about a spider queen stepping on me, and I thought it helped – all those times, it was PLACEBO, because I don’t have a PROSTATE?

…hmm. I’ve only encountered this from the other direction (having to *avoid* thinking too hard about sexy stuff when I *do* get to a bathroom), but I *have* encountered it. I don’t have a prostate (…as far as I know; barring some particularly subtle intersex condition), but I’m not sure how it could be placebo, since I wasn’t told to expect it.


Tags:

#reply via reblog #sexuality and lack thereof #is the blue I see the same as the blue you see #this probably deserves some warning tag but I am not sure what #unsanitary cw?

prokopetz:

Okay, I know the real reason that the little coloured outlines on the severe weather advisory maps stop dead at the US/Canada border is that the Canadian weather service does not have the authority to issue weather advisories for US territories, but what it looks like at a casual glance is that the weather system is actually shaped like that.

Now I’m imagining a fantasy setting where the natural world really does respect political boundaries. Each country has its own totally isolated climate. Rivers need to be issued passports in order to flow between nations, or else they just stop at the border and start flooding everything. Migratory animals form orderly queues at customs checkpoints and have all their paperwork in order – nobody knows how they prepare it.


Tags:

#story ideas I will never write

prongsmydeer:

The most hilarious thing about the fact Buckbeak had a trial and lost is that later on JKR resolves the issue by having Hagrid take him in again and renaming him Witherwings. That’s literally all it took. What if in POA, Hagrid simply said, “Sorry, Buckbeak flew away.” 

“There’s a hippogriff right there, Hagrid.”

“A different hipprogriff.”

“I’m… pretty sure that’s the same hipprogriff.”

“Prove it.” 

 

twelvemonkeyswere:

no dna tests we die like scientifically underdeveloped societies

 

thesanityclause:

Prisoner of Azkaban continues to be the most frustrating book

 

septimusprime:

Someone should have just adopted Sirius and started calling him Gerald.

 

dreadpiratemary:

Remus: Erm… this is our new order member, my… cousin Gerald. Gerald White.

 

zero0000:

“Mr. Lupin that is Sirius Black with glasses!”
“Oh come now Minister, Sirius Black doesn’t wear glasses. That wouldn’t make sense.”
“Well have Mr. White take off his glasses then!”
“He can’t he needs them to see.”

 

animatedamerican:

it got better

 

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

It’s honestly a miracle to me that wizarding society doesn’t collapse every other week because like

You’ve got this world full of people who can destroy whole buildings or turn people into beetles or make vehicles fly just by waving a stick at them

And there is literally no common sense 

Anywhere to be found

Voldemort would never have had anyone find out he was back if he just went around calling himself Steve 

 

kat8noghosts:

Okay, see, I thought I saved this post to comment on it but I’d like to bring up

The Minister would NEVER EVER disbelieve in Gerald White. He’d buy it hook line and sinker. The wizarding world would buy it hook line and sinker. The GOBLINS wouldn’t but wizards have been shown to be pretty blindingly clueless. Still, Gringotts would grudgingly give Sirius access to the Black fortune.

But, but, but, you know the one person

the one person

who Gerald White would drive AB-SO-LUTELY FUCKING BATSHIT?

Severus Snape.

Snape would do everything, EVERYTHING, to get people to believe that it’s Sirius. But the Order would ignore it (they accepted Sirius as Sirius before anyway) and Remus would just be so… so affronted.

‘Severus, he is my cousin.’

And Sirius would love it. He’d love the fact that Snape just hated it. He’d be the BEST DAMN GERALD WHITE EVER b/c Snape is doing everything from dropping veritaserum into his firewhisky to capturing a dementor in a box and releasing it on Sirius when he least expects it

That one causes problems for a bare minute because SHIT A DEMENTOR ATTEMPTED TO GIVE GERALD THE KISS MAYBE SNAPE IS RIGHT except Harry comes forward and is like ‘excuse me, I’ve never committed a crime and dementors are ALWAYS attacking me, I think they’re attracted to glasses’

and the magical community is like ‘shit, yeah, you’re right’

and just

Spare. Snape goes spare.

 

laurathia:

Picturing Snape as Mr. Crocker from the Fairly Oddparents now.

 

mariana-oconnor:

Gerald White eventually becomes a fully registered animagus. When he turns into his animagus form right in front of Snape, Snape’s bursting at the seams, just pointing at him and spluttering:

‘HE’S A BIG BLACK DOG! A DOG – THAT IS BLACK. SIRIUS BLACK. BLACK DOG DOG BLACK.’

And Remus calmly says: “That’s absurd, Severus. Sirius Black was never an animagus and besides which, people’s names don’t have any influence over their animagus forms or anything like that. That’s ridiculous.”

And Snape yells: “Shut it WEREWOLF MCWEREWOLF!”

Everyone looks at Remus, who blinks and sighs as Gerald White turns back into his human form.

“Pure coincidence,” Gerald says. “My aunt was into Roman mythology. Has to happen sometimes.” Then he pauses to give Snape an overly concerned look. “Are you alright, Severus? You’re looking a little red.”

 

thehufflenerd:

^this is my new life

 

tooweirdtolivetoogaytodie:

im crying thanks for this

 

my-insanity-is-an-artform:

Another point in the direction of Gerald White Not Being Sirius Black is that everyone knows Sirius Black hated Severus Snape.

Gerald White bakes the ungrateful dungeon bat cookies and is always polite to him. It so nice that Gerald really wants to be friends.


Tags:

#Harry Potter #fanfic #anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #(I might have reblogged an earlier version of this already but this one is even better) #long post

silentwalrus1:

silentwalrus1:

i had a thought today like man, my ancestors would probably not approve very much of me being such an extravagant glutton, but then i was like wtf are u kidding. those dumbasses didn’t live on a fuckin potato ass diet for no minimalism. they didn’t do what they did, whatever the fuck it was, for me NOT to fucking eat my bodyweight in sashimi!!! they would be fucking ecstatic to see me making the most of my opportunities for plenty. they would be fucking cheering me on. every lice-covered cossack and illiterate serf and three-toothed yak herder in my lineage is with me in this restaurant, and they are going absolutely apeshit watching me try to fit an entire samosa in my mouth

i love this idea that the ancestors are following modern people around like a rappers yes-man as we eat food #‘fucking superb you funky little descendant’ 

me, standing in front of the burger king counter like the blithering hunger gibbon i am: i’ll have… uhhh… double whopper with fries. thank you. large please

the 500 mongolian tatar and polish jew ghosts behind me: [ERUPT INTO WILD SCREAMING AND HIGH FIVES] 


Tags:

#anything that makes me laugh this much deserves a reblog #food #disordered eating #I do not know this feel but the post is still hilarious #(personally‚ while having a low appetite took some getting used to I’m very happy with it now) #((also there are quite a few Puritans in my ancestry so there’s that))

some mildly interesting things from the SSC survey

cptsdcarlosdevil:

mysticfurywerewolf:

oligopsalter:

i need to clean the dataset in a more systematic way – someone has no doubt already done this, but it’s good practice – but here’s a few things that struck me as interesting. note that i looked at a bunch of things and didn’t correct for that, that i looked at them in a sloppy way, and that of course i went right for mindkilling stuff.

for all the talk about consequentialism and scrupulosity, metaethics has approximately zero effect on how good of a person you think you are

nrx types should switch their conspiracy theories away from the jews puritans and towards quakers

comments section regulars are skewed in the way i’d expect, but i’m a bit surprised there are so few of them. imagine if we deployed even a fraction of argumate’s power…!

ressentiment is small but real (sample above straight cis men only; cis women have opposite trend but obv noisier) but the real trend is that the real incels have no opinion on feminism. (all nonresponse results are correlated with each other so that could be a part of it, idk. i said i was sloppy!)

everybody’s penis is huge

neat!

i’m still baffled by the graph for “find kink at least a little bit sexy”:

(last one is “explicitly none of the above”)

like, 6% even-a-little-furries?! how???

am i furry friends georg?! (i mean, trans, so yes, but.)

but even more puzzling, more doms than subs?!

like, confirmed by next question:

ssc truly is a bizarro world.

(i’d love to know if at least all the trans people are furries, and if the doms are super gross and thus outside my circles, but the sex data is unfortunately not in the public data set.)

Lactation fetish is more popular than foot fetish or furries? Only 12% like leather? It’s leather! Who is not at least a little bit turned on by chicks in leather?

I suspect the Dom Mystery might be that the single most common set of kinks among straight guys IME is like… lowkey dom? Like, they like tying you up, calling you a slut, being a bit forceful, maybe a bit of spanking, but they are really uninterested in most BDSM stuff. And those guys are usually not switches.

What do the 36.7% of people who don’t get off on any of the Generic Kinks jerk off to? I’m sort of concerned that the other 64% of us has made all the porn kinky and now they have no material. 

I can’t speak for everyone who took the SSC survey and checked off “none of the above” on the Generic Kinks list, but I can speak for one of them:

It’s not that I don’t *have* fetishes, it’s that I have *very specific* fetishes that weren’t on the list. Good porn can indeed be tricky to find, but making more vanilla porn won’t help me at all: I’m not into that either.


Tags:

#sexuality and lack thereof #reply via reblog #survey #nsfw text?